Forces applied to the cervical spine during posteroanterior mobilization.

OBJECTIVE There is little information on manual forces applied during cervical mobilization, a common treatment technique. Potential variability of applied forces between therapists and treatment occasions, and factors associated with different force applications are unknown. The purpose of this study is to establish the baseline mechanical properties of cervical spine mobilization and to determine if the applied forces are affected by the characteristics of therapists and mobilized subjects. METHODS Physiotherapists (n = 116) applied 4 grades of posteroanterior mobilization to the premarked C2 and C7 spinous (central technique) and articular processes (unilateral technique, one right and one left) of 1 of 35 asymptomatic subjects. Techniques were performed in randomized order, and the first one was repeated after 20 minutes. Load cells attached to the treatment table recorded forces in 3 directions. Before mobilization, subjects' spinal stiffness at the C2 and C7 spinous processes was measured using a custom device. Analyses of variance with Bonferroni post hoc tests determined technique and grade differences, intraclass correlation coefficients the reliability between therapists, and linear regression the factors associated with forces. RESULTS Therapists apply distinct manual forces for different techniques and grades (P < .001). Variability between therapists is high, but intratherapist reliability is good (intraclass correlation coefficient [2,1] for different force parameters, 0.84-0.93). Mean peak forces increase from grades I to IV, ranging from 22 to 92 N for resultant forces. Greater vertical and caudad-cephalad forces are applied to C7 than C2 (P < .01), with higher mediolateral forces during unilateral techniques (P < .001). Male sex of the therapist or the mobilized subject is associated with higher forces, and C2 stiffness, thumb pain and postgraduate training with lower (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS These results quantify cervical mobilization forces, which will inform future research aimed at improving its application and clinical effectiveness.

[1]  J. Fritz,et al.  Preliminary Examination of a Proposed Treatment-Based Classification System for Patients Receiving Physical Therapy Interventions for Neck Pain , 2007, Physical Therapy.

[2]  W. Herzog,et al.  Biomechanical characterization (fingerprinting) of five novel methods of cervical spine manipulation. , 1993, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[3]  W. Herzog,et al.  Forces exerted during spinal manipulative therapy. , 1993, Spine.

[4]  M. Harms,et al.  Variability of forces applied by experienced therapists during spinal mobilization. , 1997, Clinical biomechanics.

[5]  Gerrit G J M van Zoest,et al.  Three-dimensionality of direct contact forces in chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy. , 2003, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[6]  K. Refshauge,et al.  Causes of complications from cervical spine manipulation. , 2001, The Australian journal of physiotherapy.

[7]  P. Huijbregts,et al.  Spinal Motion Palpation: A Review of Reliability Studies , 2002 .

[8]  G. Grieve.  Mobilisation of the spine , 1979 .

[9]  L. Bouter,et al.  Cost effectiveness of physiotherapy, manual therapy, and general practitioner care for neck pain: economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial. , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[10]  F. Ninio,et al.  A calculation of the room temperature elastic constants of caesium thiocyanate , 1986 .

[11]  W. Herzog,et al.  Forces generated during spinal manipulative therapy of the cervical spine: a pilot study. , 1992, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[12]  G. Jull.  Use of high and low velocity cervical manipulative therapy procedures by Australian manipulative physiotherapists. , 2002, The Australian journal of physiotherapy.

[13]  E. Owens,et al.  Comparisons of lordotic cervical spine curvatures to a theoretical ideal model of the static sagittal cervical spine. , 1996, Spine.

[14]  John D. Childs,et al.  Development of a Clinical Prediction Rule for Guiding Treatment of a Subgroup of Patients With Neck Pain: Use of Thoracic Spine Manipulation, Exercise, and Patient Education , 2007, Physical Therapy.

[15]  L. Murphy,et al.  Reliability of Spinal Palpation for Diagnosis of Back and Neck Pain: A Systematic Review of the Literature , 2004, Spine.

[16]  P. Santaguida,et al.  Conservative management of mechanical neck disorders: a systematic review. , 2007, The Journal of rheumatology.

[17]  D. Rivett,et al.  Calibration of an instrumented treatment table for measuring manual therapy forces applied to the cervical spine. , 2008, Manual therapy.

[18]  D. Shirley,et al.  The response of posteroanterior lumbar stiffness to repeated loading. , 2002, Manual therapy.

[19]  M. Lynn Palmer,et al.  Fundamentals of Musculoskeletal Assessment Techniques , 1994 .

[20]  A. Michaeli.  Reported occurrence and nature of complications following manipulative physiotherapy in South Africa. , 1993, The Australian journal of physiotherapy.

[21]  V F Sadil,et al.  Maitland's Vertebral Manipulation , 2010 .

[22]  Darren A Rivett,et al.  Measuring the posteroanterior stiffness of the cervical spine. , 2008, Manual therapy.

[23]  A. Moore,et al.  A descriptive study of the usage of spinal manipulative therapy techniques within a randomized clinical trial in acute low back pain. , 2005, Manual therapy.

[24]  R. Lipton,et al.  Lost productive time and cost due to common pain conditions in the US workforce. , 2003, JAMA.

[25]  P. Buckle,et al.  The nature of work-related neck and upper limb musculoskeletal disorders. , 2002, Applied ergonomics.

[26]  J. M. Bryan,et al.  Spinal Mobilization Curricula in Professional Physical Therapy Education Programs , 1997 .

[27]  D. Rivett,et al.  Factors related to thumb pain in physiotherapists. , 2003, The Australian journal of physiotherapy.

[28]  C. Goldsmith,et al.  Manipulation and mobilisation for mechanical neck disorders. , 2004, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[29]  R. Kerry.  Pre-manipulative Procedures for the Cervical Spine New guidelines and a time for dialectics: Knowledge, risks, evidence and consent , 2002 .

[30]  D C Patterson,et al.  Musculoskeletal examination. , 1984, Occupational health nursing.

[31]  L. Leemis.  Applied Linear Regression Models , 1991 .

[32]  R. Adams,et al.  Instrumented measurement of spinal stiffness. , 1996, Manual therapy.

[33]  Darren A Rivett,et al.  Manual forces applied during posterior-to-anterior spinal mobilization: a review of the evidence. , 2006, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[34]  C. Maher,et al.  Forces applied during manual therapy to patients with low back pain. , 2002, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[35]  K. Refshauge,et al.  Pre-manipulative testing of the cervical spine review, revision and new clinical guidelines. , 2004, Manual therapy.

[36]  C. Cook,et al.  Predictive Factors in Poor Inter-Rater Reliability Among Physical Therapists , 2002 .

[37]  Tadeusz J. Janik,et al.  Comparisons of Lordotic Cervical Spine Curvatures to a Theoretical Ideal Model of the Static Sagittal Cervical Spine , 1996, Spine.

[38]  J. M. Bryan,et al.  Joint manipulation curricula in physical therapist professional degree programs. , 2004, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[39]  Lex M Bouter,et al.  Cost-of-illness of neck pain in The Netherlands in 1996 , 1999, Pain.

[40]  S. Hoppenfeld,et al.  Physical examination of the spine and extremities , 1976 .

[41]  T. Matyas,et al.  The reliability of selected techniques in clinical arthrometrics. , 1985, The Australian journal of physiotherapy.

[42]  Mitchell Haas,et al.  Efficacy of spinal manipulation and mobilization for low back pain and neck pain: a systematic review and best evidence synthesis. , 2004, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.