A FORM-based analysis of lifeline networks using a multivariate seismic intensity model

Governmental organizations, private firms, and others in seismically active regions are interested in how reliable lifeline networks will be in the event of an earthquake. Assessing risk in these networks is more complicated than assessing risk for individual sites using traditional Probabilistic Seis - mic Hazard Analysis (PSHA) because of interdependencies among different system links, as well as cor - relations among ground motion intensities across a region. The focus of this paper is three-fold: (1) to construct a multivariate probability distribution of seismic intensities at many locations in an example network, by analyzing simulated earthquake data, (2) to develop a framework based on the First Order Reliability Method (FORM) to calculate network flow capacity after a disaster, and (3) to illustrate the importance of more accurately describing joint distributions of ground motion intensities when com - puting lifeline network reliability. This proposed approach provides probability distributions of network flow capacity given an earthquake, and also quantifies the importance of each lifeline component, which would allow system administrators to identify the most critical links in their lifeline systems and prioritize network upgrades. The example results indicate that neglecting the correlation of the ground motions can result in gross overestimation or underestimation of the probability of achieving a given system flow.

[1]  G. Atkinson,et al.  Ground-Motion Prediction Equations for the Average Horizontal Component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-Damped PSA at Spectral Periods between 0.01 s and 10.0 s , 2008 .

[2]  J. Baker,et al.  Correlation model for spatially distributed ground‐motion intensities , 2009 .

[3]  Terje Haukaas,et al.  Structural reliability software at the University of California, Berkeley , 2006 .

[4]  Franklin A. Graybill,et al.  Introduction to the Theory of Statistics, 3rd ed. , 1974 .

[5]  Efstratios Nikolaidis,et al.  First- and Second-Order Reliability Methods , 2004 .

[6]  Anne S. Kiremidjian,et al.  Treatment of uncertainties in seismic risk analysis of transportation systems , 2006 .

[7]  J. Baker,et al.  Statistical Tests of the Joint Distribution of Spectral Acceleration Values , 2008 .

[8]  Paolo Gardoni,et al.  Post-hazard flow capacity of bridge transportation network considering structural deterioration of bridges , 2011 .

[9]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  Modelling Seismic Hazard in Earthquake Loss Models with Spatially Distributed Exposure , 2006 .

[10]  Paolo Bazzurro,et al.  Modeling spatial correlation of ground motion Intensity Measures for regional seismic hazard and portfolio loss estimation , 2007 .

[11]  William K. Cloud,et al.  Seismological Society of America: Treasurer's report for period February 15, 1961 to February 14, 1962 , 1962 .

[12]  S D Townley,et al.  SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA. , 1923, Science.

[13]  J. Bommer,et al.  Modelling Seismic Hazard in Earthquake Loss Models with Spatially Distributed Exposure , 2006 .

[14]  Jack W. Baker,et al.  Efficient sampling and data reduction techniques for probabilistic seismic lifeline risk assessment , 2010 .

[15]  A. Kiremidjian,et al.  Uncertainty and Correlation for Loss Assessment of Spatially Distributed Systems , 2007 .

[16]  Ravindra K. Ahuja,et al.  Network Flows: Theory, Algorithms, and Applications , 1993 .