Localization of correlated network activity at the cortical level with MEG

In both hemodynamic and neurophysiological imaging methods, analysis of functionally interconnected networks has typically focused on brain areas that show strong activation in specific tasks. Alternatively, connectivity measures may be used directly to localize network nodes, independent of their level of activation. This approach requires initial cortical reference areas which may be identified based on their high level of activation, their coherence with an external reference signal, or their strong connectivity with other brain areas. Irrespective of how the nodes have been localized the mathematical complexity of the analysis methods precludes verification of the accuracy and completeness of the network structure by direct comparison with the measured data. Therefore, it is critical to understand how the choices of parameters and procedures used in the analysis affect the network identification. Here, using simulated and measured magnetoencephalography (MEG) data, and Dynamic Imaging of Coherent Sources (DICS) for connectivity analysis, we quantify the veracity of network detection at the individual and group level as a function of relevant parameter choices. Using simulations, we demonstrate that coupling measures enable accurate identification of the network structure even without external reference signals, and illustrate the applicability of this approach to real data. We show that a valid estimate of interindividual variability is critical for reliable group-level analysis. Although this study focuses on application of DICS to MEG data, many issues considered here, especially those regarding individual vs. group-level analysis, are likely to be relevant for other neuroimaging methods and analysis approaches as well.

[1]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Effective Connectivity and Intersubject Variability: Using a Multisubject Network to Test Differences and Commonalities , 2002, NeuroImage.

[2]  Olivier David,et al.  Waves of consciousness: ongoing cortical patterns during binocular rivalry , 2004, NeuroImage.

[3]  A. Schnitzler,et al.  Normal and pathological oscillatory communication in the brain , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[4]  O. Bertrand,et al.  Oscillatory Synchrony between Human Extrastriate Areas during Visual Short-Term Memory Maintenance , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  A. E. Schulman,et al.  Functional coupling of human cortical sensorimotor areas during bimanual skill acquisition. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[6]  E. Halgren,et al.  Dynamic Statistical Parametric Mapping Combining fMRI and MEG for High-Resolution Imaging of Cortical Activity , 2000, Neuron.

[7]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling , 2003, NeuroImage.

[8]  F. Varela,et al.  Perception's shadow: long-distance synchronization of human brain activity , 1999, Nature.

[9]  Alexander Münchau,et al.  Investigating the human mirror neuron system by means of cortical synchronization during the imitation of biological movements , 2006, NeuroImage.

[10]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Mapping directed influence over the brain using Granger causality and fMRI , 2005, NeuroImage.

[11]  R. Hari,et al.  Phase locking between human primary and secondary somatosensory cortices , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  C. Büchel,et al.  Modulation of connectivity in visual pathways by attention: cortical interactions evaluated with structural equation modelling and fMRI. , 1997, Cerebral cortex.

[13]  Kimron Shapiro,et al.  Modulation of long-range neural synchrony reflects temporal limitations of visual attention in humans. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  J. Palva,et al.  Phase Synchrony among Neuronal Oscillations in the Human Cortex , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  I. Johnsrude,et al.  The problem of functional localization in the human brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[16]  A. E. Schulman,et al.  Functional coupling and regional activation of human cortical motor areas during simple, internally paced and externally paced finger movements. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[17]  J Gross,et al.  REPRINTS , 1962, The Lancet.

[18]  C. Granger Testing for causality: a personal viewpoint , 1980 .

[19]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Adaptive reconfiguration of fractal small-world human brain functional networks , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  C. Büchel,et al.  Dynamic changes in effective connectivity characterized by variable parameter regression and kalman filtering , 1998, Human brain mapping.

[21]  O. Jensen,et al.  Neuromagnetic localization of rhythmic activity in the human brain: a comparison of three methods , 2005, NeuroImage.

[22]  Dimitri Van De Ville,et al.  Determining significant connectivity by 4D spatiotemporal wavelet packet resampling of functional neuroimaging data , 2006, NeuroImage.

[23]  H. Petsche,et al.  Synchronization between prefrontal and posterior association cortex during human working memory. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  A. Schnitzler,et al.  The neural basis of intermittent motor control in humans , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Sampling theory for neuromagnetic detector arrays , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[26]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  Dimitrios Pantazis,et al.  Coherent neural representation of hand speed in humans revealed by MEG imaging , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain , 1993 .

[29]  Krish D. Singh,et al.  A new approach to neuroimaging with magnetoencephalography , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[30]  G. Cecchi,et al.  Scale-free brain functional networks. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[31]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Modelling functional integration: a comparison of structural equation and dynamic causal models , 2004, NeuroImage.

[32]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dissociating Reading Processes on the Basis of Neuronal Interactions , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[33]  H Petsche,et al.  Synchronization between temporal and parietal cortex during multimodal object processing in man. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[34]  K. Sekihara,et al.  Generalized Wiener estimation of three-dimensional current distribution from biomagnetic measurements , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[35]  W. Drongelen,et al.  Localization of brain electrical activity via linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filtering , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[36]  E. Formisano,et al.  Phase coupling in a cerebro-cerebellar network at 8-13 Hz during reading. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[37]  Apostolos P Georgopoulos,et al.  Synchronous dynamic brain networks revealed by magnetoencephalography. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  M. Butz,et al.  Oscillatory coupling in writing and writer’s cramp , 2006, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[39]  Se Robinson,et al.  Functional neuroimaging by Synthetic Aperture Magnetometry (SAM) , 1999 .

[40]  D. Collins,et al.  Automatic 3D Intersubject Registration of MR Volumetric Data in Standardized Talairach Space , 1994, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[41]  A M Amjad,et al.  A framework for the analysis of mixed time series/point process data--theory and application to the study of physiological tremor, single motor unit discharges and electromyograms. , 1995, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[42]  T. Schreiber,et al.  Surrogate time series , 1999, chao-dyn/9909037.

[43]  Luca Faes,et al.  Surrogate data analysis for assessing the significance of the coherence function , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[44]  J. Xiong,et al.  Intersubject Variability in Cortical Activations during a Complex Language Task , 2000, NeuroImage.

[45]  Jürgen Kurths,et al.  Detection of n:m Phase Locking from Noisy Data: Application to Magnetoencephalography , 1998 .

[46]  T Schormann,et al.  Three‐Dimensional linear and nonlinear transformations: An integration of light microscopical and MRI data , 1998, Human brain mapping.

[47]  Wolf Singer,et al.  Neuronal Synchrony: A Versatile Code for the Definition of Relations? , 1999, Neuron.

[48]  Justin L. Vincent,et al.  Spontaneous neuronal activity distinguishes human dorsal and ventral attention systems. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[49]  D. B. Preston Spectral Analysis and Time Series , 1983 .

[50]  Laura Astolfi,et al.  Estimation of the cortical connectivity by high-resolution EEG and structural equation modeling: Simulations and application to finger tapping data , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[51]  A. Ioannides,et al.  Linear transformations of data space in MEG. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[52]  F. Varela,et al.  Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[53]  Riitta Salmelin,et al.  Neural representation of language: activation versus long-range connectivity , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[54]  Cornelis J. Stam,et al.  Magnetoencephalographic evaluation of resting-state functional connectivity in Alzheimer's disease , 2006, NeuroImage.

[55]  E. Bullmore,et al.  A Resilient, Low-Frequency, Small-World Human Brain Functional Network with Highly Connected Association Cortical Hubs , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.