Meta-analysis and sexual selection: past studies and future possibilities

[1]  C. Lortie,et al.  Publication and Related Biases , 2013 .

[2]  Kerrie Mengersen,et al.  Handbook of Meta-analysis in Ecology and Evolution , 2013 .

[3]  R. Poulin,et al.  Meta-analysis and research on host–parasite interactions: past and future , 2012, Evolutionary Ecology.

[4]  Shinichi Nakagawa,et al.  The influence of male age on within‐pair and extra‐pair paternity in passerines , 2012 .

[5]  H. Kokko,et al.  The opportunity to be misled in studies of sexual selection , 2012, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[6]  M. Verdú,et al.  Meta-analysis of meta-analyses in plant evolutionary ecology , 2012, Evolutionary Ecology.

[7]  Joel G. Kingsolver,et al.  Synthetic analyses of phenotypic selection in natural populations: lessons, limitations and future directions , 2012, Evolutionary Ecology.

[8]  Shinichi Nakagawa,et al.  Methodological issues and advances in biological meta-analysis , 2012, Evolutionary Ecology.

[9]  J. Hadfield,et al.  DIRECTIONAL SELECTION IN TEMPORALLY REPLICATED STUDIES IS REMARKABLY CONSISTENT , 2012, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[10]  P. Backwell,et al.  Estimating genetic benefits of polyandry from experimental studies: a meta‐analysis , 2012, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[11]  Shinichi Nakagawa,et al.  Strategic female reproductive investment in response to male attractiveness in birds , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  H. Kokko.  Directions in modelling partial migration: how adaptation can cause a population decline and why the rules of territory acquisition matter , 2011 .

[13]  László Zsolt Garamszegi,et al.  Nonrandom variation in within-species sample size and missing data in phylogenetic comparative studies. , 2011, Systematic biology.

[14]  P. Wehi,et al.  Does predation result in adult sex ratio skew in a sexually dimorphic insect genus? , 2011, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[15]  M. Jennions,et al.  Sexual selection and sperm quantity: meta‐analyses of strategic ejaculation , 2011, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[16]  D. Blumstein,et al.  Ontogenetic and Sex Differences Influence Alarm Call Responses in Mammals: a Meta-Analysis , 2011 .

[17]  J. delBarco‐Trillo.  Adjustment of sperm allocation under high risk of sperm competition across taxa: a meta‐analysis , 2011, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[18]  Shinichi Nakagawa,et al.  Dominance and plumage traits: meta-analysis and metaregression analysis , 2011, Animal Behaviour.

[19]  S. Verhulst,et al.  Zebra finch females prefer males with redder bills independent of song rate—a meta-analysis , 2011 .

[20]  S. Lewis,et al.  The influence of male ejaculate quantity on female fitness: a meta‐analysis , 2011, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[21]  K. Kraaijeveld,et al.  Sexual selection and speciation: the comparative evidence revisited , 2011, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[22]  T. Schmoll,et al.  A review and perspective on context-dependent genetic effects of extra-pair mating in birds , 2011, Journal of Ornithology.

[23]  I. Jamieson,et al.  Multimodel inference in ecology and evolution: challenges and solutions , 2011, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[24]  A. Roulin,et al.  Eumelanin-based coloration and fitness parameters in birds: a meta-analysis , 2011, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[25]  H. Leirs,et al.  Male hosts drive infracommunity structure of ectoparasites , 2011, Oecologia.

[26]  M. Soma,et al.  Rethinking birdsong evolution: meta-analysis of the relationship between song complexity and reproductive success , 2011 .

[27]  J. Gillooly,et al.  The Cost of Sex: Quantifying Energetic Investment in Gamete Production by Males and Females , 2011, PloS one.

[28]  J. W. Grant,et al.  The Influence of Operational Sex Ratio on the Intensity of Competition for Mates , 2011, The American Naturalist.

[29]  D. H. Reed,et al.  INBREEDING DEPRESSION INCREASES WITH ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY AND META‐ANALYSIS , 2011, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[30]  B. Sheldon,et al.  Age, sex and beauty: methodological dependence of age- and sex-dichromatism in the great tit Parus major , 2010 .

[31]  S. Chenoweth,et al.  The Genetic Basis of Sexually Selected Variation , 2010 .

[32]  L. Garamszegi,et al.  Effects of sample size and intraspecific variation in phylogenetic comparative studies: a meta‐analytic review , 2010, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[33]  J. Evans.  Quantitative genetic evidence that males trade attractiveness for ejaculate quality in guppies , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[34]  T. Chapman,et al.  Adaptations to sexual selection and sexual conflict: insights from experimental evolution and artificial selection , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[35]  H. Schielzeth,et al.  Cryptic multiple hypotheses testing in linear models: overestimated effect sizes and the winner's curse , 2010, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[36]  David A. Enstrom,et al.  Male Red-winged Blackbirds with experimentally dulled epaulets experience no disadvantage in sexual selection , 2010 .

[37]  T. Detto,et al.  Experimental evidence for a seasonal shift in the strength of a female mating preference , 2010 .

[38]  J. Hadfield,et al.  General quantitative genetic methods for comparative biology: phylogenies, taxonomies and multi‐trait models for continuous and categorical characters , 2010, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[39]  D. Coltman,et al.  SEX‐SPECIFIC GENETIC VARIANCE AND THE EVOLUTION OF SEXUAL DIMORPHISM: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF CROSS‐SEX GENETIC CORRELATIONS , 2010, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[40]  T. Blackburn,et al.  The role of species traits in the establishment success of exotic birds , 2009 .

[41]  J. DiBattista,et al.  It's about time: the temporal dynamics of phenotypic selection in the wild. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[42]  B. Krasnov,et al.  Parasite-specific variation and the extent of male-biased parasitism; an example with a South African rodent and ectoparasitic arthropods , 2009, Parasitology.

[43]  F Harrison,et al.  How is sexual conflict over parental care resolved? A meta‐analysis , 2009, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[44]  M. Lajeunesse,et al.  Meta‐Analysis and the Comparative Phylogenetic Method , 2009, The American Naturalist.

[45]  J. R. Chapman,et al.  A quantitative review of heterozygosity–fitness correlations in animal populations , 2009, Molecular ecology.

[46]  R. Freckleton.  The seven deadly sins of comparative analysis , 2009, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[47]  B. Sheldon,et al.  Environmental Sensitivity in Relation to Size and Sex in Birds: Meta‐Regression Analysis , 2009, The American Naturalist.

[48]  W. E. Harris,et al.  Reproductive investment when mate quality varies: differential allocation versus reproductive compensation , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[49]  Kate L. Laskowski,et al.  The repeatability of behaviour: a meta-analysis , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[50]  B. Sheldon,et al.  Elevated reproductive effort increases blood parasitaemia and decreases immune function in birds: a meta-regression approach , 2009 .

[51]  S. Griffith,et al.  Female infidelity and genetic compatibility in birds: the role of the genetically loaded raffle in understanding the function of extrapair paternity , 2009 .

[52]  M. Eens,et al.  Elevated yolk androgen levels and the expression of multiple sexually selected male characters , 2009, Hormones and Behavior.

[53]  C. Nunn,et al.  On sexual dimorphism in immune function , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[54]  A. J. Moore,et al.  Male–male competition, female mate choice and their interaction: determining total sexual selection , 2009, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[55]  P. Gowaty.  Reproductive compensation , 2008, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[56]  A. Ros,et al.  Immune activation suppresses plasma testosterone level: a meta-analysis , 2008, Biology Letters.

[57]  U. Candolin,et al.  Is sexual selection beneficial during adaptation to environmental change? , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[58]  H. Kokko,et al.  Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios , 2008, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[59]  H. Kokko,et al.  Current analyses do not resolve whether extra-pair paternity is male or female driven , 2008, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[60]  C. Randler.  Mating Patterns in Avian Hybrid Zones — A Meta-Analysis and Review , 2008 .

[61]  Clint D. Kelly,et al.  The interrelationships between resource-holding potential, resource-value and reproductive success in territorial males: How much variation can we explain? , 2008, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[62]  D. Adams,et al.  PHYLOGENETIC META-ANALYSIS , 2008, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[63]  Daniel T. Blumstein,et al.  Fitness consequences of personality: a meta-analysis , 2008 .

[64]  I. Cuthill,et al.  Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists , 2007, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[65]  J. Komdeur,et al.  The evolution of mutual ornamentation , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[66]  Shinichi Nakagawa,et al.  Assessing the function of house sparrows' bib size using a flexible meta-analysis method , 2007 .

[67]  R. Bonduriansky.  ORIGINAL ARTICLE doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00081.x SEXUAL SELECTION AND ALLOMETRY: A CRITICAL REAPPRAISAL OF THE EVIDENCE AND IDEAS , 2006 .

[68]  M. Eens,et al.  Age-Dependent Expression of Song in the Collared Flycatcher, Ficedula albicollis , 2007 .

[69]  G. Boncoraglio,et al.  Habitat structure and the evolution of bird song: a meta-analysis of the evidence for the acoustic adaptation hypothesis , 2007 .

[70]  S. Griffith.  The Evolution of Infidelity in Socially Monogamous Passerines: Neglected Components of Direct and Indirect Selection , 2007, The American Naturalist.

[71]  M. Blows.  Complexity for complexity's sake? , 2007 .

[72]  A. Møller,et al.  Revised evidence for facultative sex ratio adjustment in birds: a correction , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[73]  H. Kokko,et al.  Unifying and Testing Models of Sexual Selection , 2006 .

[74]  D. H. Reed,et al.  Realistic levels of inbreeding depression strongly affect extinction risk in wild populations , 2006 .

[75]  T. Parker,et al.  The blue tit's song is an inconsistent signal of male condition , 2006 .

[76]  W. Blanckenhorn,et al.  WHEN RENSCH MEETS BERGMANN: DOES SEXUAL SIZE DIMORPHISM CHANGE SYSTEMATICALLY WITH LATITUDE? , 2006, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[77]  Jennifer Small,et al.  Sexual Selection and Condition-Dependent Mate Preferences , 2006, Current Biology.

[78]  James H. Brown,et al.  The allometry of ornaments and weapons. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[79]  M. Forbes,et al.  Sex biases in dispersal and philopatry: insights from a meta-analysis based on capture–mark–recapture studies of damselflies , 2006 .

[80]  H. Kokko,et al.  From Hawks and Doves to Self‐Consistent Games of Territorial Behavior , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[81]  T. Parker,et al.  Melanin- versus carotenoid-based sexual signals: is the difference really so black and red? , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[82]  J. Piálek,et al.  The Strength of Direct Selection against Female Promiscuity Is Associated with Rates of Extrapair Fertilizations in Socially Monogamous Songbirds , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[83]  H. Kokko,et al.  WHEN NOT TO AVOID INBREEDING , 2006, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[84]  D. Rankin,et al.  Lonely hearts or sex in the city? Density-dependent effects in mating systems , 2006, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[85]  Rui F. Oliveira,et al.  Social modulation of androgens in male vertebrates: meta-analyses of the challenge hypothesis , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[86]  Christian Peter Klingenberg,et al.  The genetics and evolution of fluctuating asymmetry , 2005 .

[87]  L. Simmons.  The Evolution of Polyandry: Sperm Competition, Sperm Selection, and Offspring Viability , 2005 .

[88]  L. Garamszegi,et al.  Bird song and parasites , 2005, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[89]  A. Griffin,et al.  Cooperative Breeders Adjust Offspring Sex Ratios to Produce Helpful Helpers , 2005, The American Naturalist.

[90]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Direct and indirect tests for publication bias: asymmetry and sexual selection , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[91]  Ben C Sheldon,et al.  SEX‐RATIO ADJUSTMENT WHEN RELATIVES INTERACT: A TEST OF CONSTRAINTS ON ADAPTATION , 2005, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[92]  M. Kirkpatrick,et al.  The Evolution of Infidelity in Socially Monogamous Passerines: The Strength of Direct and Indirect Selection on Extrapair Copulation Behavior in Females , 2005, The American Naturalist.

[93]  J. Silk,et al.  Maternal rank and local resource competition do not predict birth sex ratios in wild baboons , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[94]  Michael D. Jennions,et al.  Male mating history and female fecundity in the Lepidoptera: do male virgins make better partners? , 2005, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[95]  Luc F. Bussière,et al.  High-quality male field crickets invest heavily in sexual display but die young , 2004, Nature.

[96]  A. Møller,et al.  A survey of publication bias within evolutionary ecology , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[97]  G. Schino.  Birth sex ratio and social rank: consistency and variability within and between primate groups , 2004 .

[98]  E. Cameron.  Facultative adjustment of mammalian sex ratios in support of the Trivers–Willard hypothesis: evidence for a mechanism , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[99]  M. Roberts,et al.  Testing the immunocompetence handicap hypothesis: a review of the evidence , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[100]  A. Møller,et al.  Facultative primary sex ratio variation: a lack of evidence in birds? , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[101]  Å. A. Borg,et al.  Unusually dynamic sex roles in a fish , 2004, Nature.

[102]  A. Møller,et al.  Extrapair paternity and the evolution of bird song , 2004 .

[103]  Kevin Fowler,et al.  Do sexual ornaments demonstrate heightened condition-dependent expression as predicted by the handicap hypothesis? , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[104]  László Zsolt Garamszegi,et al.  Brain space for a learned task: strong intraspecific evidence for neural correlates of singing behavior in songbirds , 2004, Brain Research Reviews.

[105]  A. Møller,et al.  Immune response and survival , 2004 .

[106]  Michael D. Jennions,et al.  Polyandry and fecundity in the Lepidoptera: can methodological and conceptual approaches bias outcomes? , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[107]  Stuart A. West,et al.  Maternal Dominance, Maternal Condition, and Offspring Sex Ratio in Ungulate Mammals , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[108]  Ronald J. Ryel,et al.  How much variance is explained by ecologists? Additional perspectives , 2003, Oecologia.

[109]  J. Slate,et al.  MICROSATELLITE MEASURES OF INBREEDING: A META‐ANALYSIS , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[110]  D. H. Reed,et al.  Correlation between Fitness and Genetic Diversity , 2003 .

[111]  T. Parker,et al.  Female mating preferences in red junglefowl: a meta-analysis , 2003 .

[112]  F. Cézilly,et al.  Breeding success and mate retention in birds: a meta-analysis , 2002, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[113]  K. Wilson,et al.  Parasites as a Viability Cost of Sexual Selection in Natural Populations of Mammals , 2002, Science.

[114]  J. Silk,et al.  Reconsidering the null hypothesis: Is maternal rank associated with birth sex ratios in primate groups? , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[115]  M. Jennions,et al.  How much variance can be explained by ecologists and evolutionary biologists? , 2002, Oecologia.

[116]  Ben C Sheldon,et al.  Constraints in the Evolution of Sex Ratio Adjustment , 2002, Science.

[117]  M. Jennions,et al.  Relationships fade with time: a meta-analysis of temporal trends in publication in ecology and evolution , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[118]  M. Jennions,et al.  How important are direct fitness benefits of sexual selection? , 2001, Naturwissenschaften.

[119]  H. Kokko.  Fisherian and "good genes" benefits of mate choice: how (not) to distinguish between them , 2001 .

[120]  M. Petrie,et al.  Sexually Selected Traits and Adult Survival: A Meta-Analysis , 2001, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[121]  A. Palmer,et al.  QUASIREPLICATION AND THE CONTRACT OF ERROR: Lessons from Sex Ratios, Heritabilities and Fluctuating Asymmetry , 2000 .

[122]  B. Sheldon,et al.  Differential allocation: tests, mechanisms and implications. , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[123]  D. Reznick,et al.  Big houses, big cars, superfleas and the costs of reproduction. , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[124]  G. Arnqvist,et al.  The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[125]  Alex J. Sutton,et al.  Publication and related biases: a review , 2000 .

[126]  Frank Johansson,et al.  Fitness and body size in mature odonates , 2000 .

[127]  R. Poulin,et al.  Manipulation of host behaviour by parasites: a weakening paradigm? , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[128]  Marlene Zuk,et al.  Sex differences in parasitic infections among arthropod hosts: is there a male bias? , 2000 .

[129]  L. Rowe,et al.  Developmental costs of male sexual traits in the water strider Rheumatobates rileyi , 1999 .

[130]  Anders Pape Møller,et al.  The strength of sexual selection: a meta-analysis of bird studies , 1999 .

[131]  D. Harper.  Feather mites, pectoral muscle condition, wing length and plumage coloration of passerines , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[132]  Anders P Møller,et al.  The Biological Significance of Fluctuating Asymmetry and Sexual Selection: A Reply to Palmer , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[133]  A. Palmer,et al.  Detecting Publication Bias in Meta‐analyses: A Case Study of Fluctuating Asymmetry and Sexual Selection , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[134]  Anders Pape Møller,et al.  A meta-analysis of fluctuating asymmetry in relation to heterozygosity , 1999, Heredity.

[135]  A. Møller,et al.  Parasitism, Host Immune Function, and Sexual Selection , 1999, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[136]  Rauno V. Alatalo,et al.  Good-genes effects in sexual selection , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[137]  A. Møller,et al.  Condition, disease and immune defence , 1998 .

[138]  Anders Pape Møller,et al.  Sperm competition and sexual selection: a meta-analysis of paternity studies of birds , 1998, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[139]  SCOTT A. FIELD,et al.  Logistic analysis of animal contests , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[140]  M. Forbes,et al.  Sex-Biased Parasitism of Avian Hosts: Relations to Blood Parasite Taxon and Mating System , 1998 .

[141]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Male parental care, differential parental investment by females and sexual selection , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[142]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Bilateral Symmetry and Sexual Selection: A Meta‐Analysis , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[143]  M. Forbes,et al.  Male biases in parasitism of mammals : effects of study type, host age, and parasite taxon , 1997 .

[144]  R. Thornhill,et al.  A meta‐analysis of the heritability of developmental stability , 1997 .

[145]  Hugh B Britten,et al.  META‐ANALYSES OF THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN MULTILOCUS HETEROZYGOSITY AND FITNESS , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[146]  R. Poulin.  Helminth growth in vertebrate hosts: does host sex matter? , 1996, International journal for parasitology.

[147]  L. Rowe,et al.  Assortative mating by size: A meta-analysis of mating patterns in water striders , 1996, Evolutionary Ecology.

[148]  Robert Poulin,et al.  Sexual Inequalities in Helminth Infections: A Cost of Being a Male? , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[149]  G. Arnqvist,et al.  Meta-analysis: synthesizing research findings in ecology and evolution. , 1995, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[150]  Jessica Gurevitch,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Competition in Field Experiments , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[151]  E. V. Werf,et al.  Lack's Clutch Size Hypothesis: An Examination of the Evidence Using Meta‐Analysis , 1992 .

[152]  A. Karter,et al.  Parasites, Bright Males, and the Immunocompetence Handicap , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[153]  N. Burley.  SEX‐RATIO MANIPULATION IN COLOR‐BANDED POPULATIONS OF ZEBRA FINCHES , 1986, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[154]  C. Lortie,et al.  Using Meta-analysis to Test Ecological and Evolutionary Theory , 2013 .

[155]  D. Kahneman.  Thinking, Fast and Slow , 2011 .

[156]  H. Kokko,et al.  Differential allocation and compensation: who deserves the silver spoon? , 2010 .

[157]  M. Gage,et al.  Links between sex change and fish densities in marine protected areas , 2008 .

[158]  J. L. Tomkins,et al.  On the resolution of the lek paradox. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[159]  Erol Akçay,et al.  Extra-pair paternity in birds: review of the genetic benefits , 2007 .

[160]  B. Kempenaers.  Mate Choice and Genetic Quality: A Review of the Heterozygosity Theory , 2007 .

[161]  R. Snook.  Sperm in competition: not playing by the numbers. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[162]  B. Hellriegel,et al.  Fertilization competence and sperm size variation in sperm-heteromorphic insects , 2004, Evolutionary Ecology.

[163]  J. Fak,et al.  Parasites as a Viability Cost of Sexual Selection in Natural Populations of Mammals , 2002 .

[164]  J. L. Tomkins,et al.  Fluctuating paradigm , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[165]  E. Abouheif.  A method for testing the assumption of phylogenetic independence in comparative data , 1999 .

[166]  Anders Pape Møller,et al.  The relative importance of size and asymmetry in sexual selection , 1998 .

[167]  P. Fiske,et al.  Mating success in lekking males: a meta-analysis , 1998 .

[168]  William J. Hamilton,et al.  The Hamilton and Zuk Hypothesis Revisited: a Meta-Analytical Approach , 1997 .

[169]  Brian Leung,et al.  Fluctuating asymmetry in relation to stress and fitness: Effects of trait type as revealed by meta-analysis , 1996 .