Analysis of the JND of Stiffness in Three Modes of Comparison

Understanding and explaining perception of touch is a non-trivial task. Even seemingly trivial differences in exploration may potentially have a significant impact on perception and levels of discrimination. In this study, we explore different aspects of contact related to stiffness perception and their effects on the just noticeable difference (JND) of stiffness are surveyed. An experiment has been performed on non-deformable, compliant objects in a virtual environment with three different types of contact: Discontinuous pressure, continuous pressure and continuous lateral motion. The result shows a significantly better discrimination performance in the case of continuous pressure (a special case of nonlinearity), which can be explained by the concept of haptic memory. Moreover, it is found that the perception is worse for the changes that occur along the lateral axis than the normal axis.

[1]  M. A. Srinivassan The impact of visual information on the haptic perception of stiffness in virtual environments , 1996 .

[2]  Jonathan Padilla San Diego,et al.  Design and Development of a Haptic Dental Training System - hapTEL , 2010, EuroHaptics.

[3]  I. Hunter,et al.  A perceptual analysis of stiffness , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  Heather Carnahan,et al.  Evidence for haptic memory , 2009, World Haptics 2009 - Third Joint EuroHaptics conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems.

[5]  Matthias Harders,et al.  Quantifying perception of nonlinear elastic tissue models using multidimensional scaling , 2009, World Haptics 2009 - Third Joint EuroHaptics conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems.

[6]  P. Roland,et al.  A quantitative analysis of sensations of tension and of kinaesthesia in man. Evidence for a peripherally originating muscular sense and for a sense of effort. , 1977, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[7]  R H LaMotte,et al.  Softness discrimination with a tool. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  M A Srinivasan,et al.  Manual discrimination of compliance using active pinch grasp: The roles of force and work cues , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  Hong Z. Tan,et al.  Force constancy and its effect on haptic perception of virtual surfaces , 2005, TAP.

[10]  Ilana Nisky,et al.  Perception of Stiffness during Interaction with Delay-Like Nonlinear Force Field , 2010, EuroHaptics.

[11]  Astrid M. L. Kappers,et al.  Cues for Haptic Perception of Compliance , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[12]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  M. Srinivasan,et al.  Tactual discrimination of softness. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Haptic perception: A tutorial , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.