This essay examines the importance of social meaning for the economic analysis of crime. Against the background of social norms, the actions of individuals and communities convey information about what they value. Individuals take these meanings into account when they are responding to the incentives created by criminal law; communities take them into account when they decide what to punish, how to punish it, and how severely. Because meaning matters in these ways, economic analyses of criminal law that abstract from meaning—by, say, considering only how various policies affect the expected penalty for wrongdoing—produce unreliable predictions and prescriptions. The essay makes out this claim by considering a number of concrete examples, including tax evasion, juvenile gun possession, gang criminality, alternative sanctions (such as shaming penalties), and corporate criminal liability.
[1]
S. Peltzman.
Toward a More General Theory of Regulation
,
1976,
The Journal of Law and Economics.
[2]
P. Rossi,et al.
Felony Punishments: A Factorial Survey of Perceived Justice in Criminal Sentencing
,
1991
.
[3]
M. Ermann,et al.
Responses to corporate versus individual wrongdoing
,
1989
.
[4]
D. Kahan,et al.
Shaming White‐Collar Criminals: A Proposal for Reform of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines*
,
1999,
The Journal of Law and Economics.
[5]
James Fitzjames Stephen,et al.
A history of the criminal law of England
,
1996
.
[6]
A. Rossier.
Letter to the Editor
,
1986,
Paraplegia.