An empirical calibration of the integral equation model based on SAR data, soil moisture and surface roughness measurement over bare soils

The retrieval of surface parameters demands the use of well calibrated models and unfortunately, none of the existing models provide consistently good agreement with the measured data. The overall objective of this article is to propose a semi-empirical calibration of the Integral Equation Model (IEM) so as to better reproduce the backscattering coefficient measured from SAR images over bare soils. As correlation length is not only the least accurate parameter but also the most difficult to measure, we propose its empirical estimation from an experimental data set of SAR images and soil parameter measurements. Based on a first data set, correlation length behaviour was studied in terms of f rms (where f is the wave number and rms the standard deviation of surface height) and radar configuration (polarization and incidence angle). Exponential relationships between optimal correlation length and rms height were found for each radar configuration. The IEM was then tested on another set of measured data in order to validate the calibration procedure. The new calibrated version of the IEM, corresponding to the original IEM with a coupling of the empirical function of correlation length, shows a very good agreement with the backscattering measurements provided by space-borne SAR systems. This adapted version of the IEM can be used in inversion techniques for retrieving rms height and/or soil moisture from radar observations.

[1]  F. Ulaby,et al.  Microwave Dielectric Behavior of Wet Soil-Part 1: Empirical Models and Experimental Observations , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[2]  François Papy,et al.  Influence des systèmes de culture sur les risques d'érosion par ruissellement concentré. I. — Analyse des conditions de déclenchement de l'érosion , 1988 .

[3]  D. Vidal-Madjar,et al.  The use of a microwave backscatter model for retrieving soil moisture over bare soil , 1992 .

[4]  Kamal Sarabandi,et al.  An empirical model and an inversion technique for radar scattering from bare soil surfaces , 1992, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[5]  A. Fung Microwave Scattering and Emission Models and their Applications , 1994 .

[6]  Pascale C. Dubois,et al.  Measuring soil moisture with imaging radars , 1995, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[7]  L. Rakotoarivony,et al.  Validation de modeles de diffusion electromagnetique : comparaison entre simulations et mesures radar heliporte sur des surfaces agricoles de sol nu , 1995 .

[8]  M. Mancini,et al.  Retrieving Soil Moisture Over Bare Soil from ERS 1 Synthetic Aperture Radar Data: Sensitivity Analysis Based on a Theoretical Surface Scattering Model and Field Data , 1996 .

[9]  D. Vidal-Madjar,et al.  Radar backscattering over agricultural bare soils , 1996 .

[10]  Agnès Company-Remond,et al.  Images sar : possibilites d'extraction d'un parametre physique du ruissellement, la rugosite (modelisation et experimentation) , 1996 .

[11]  D. Vidal-Madjar,et al.  Backscattering behavior and simulation comparison over bare soils using SIR-C/X-SAR and ERASME 1994 data over Orgeval , 1997 .

[12]  B. Brisco,et al.  Effect of surface soil moisture gradients on modelling radar backscattering from bare fields , 1997 .

[13]  Yisok Oh,et al.  Condition for precise measurement of soil surface roughness , 1998, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[14]  M. S. Moran,et al.  Relation between ERS‐1 synthetic aperture radar data and measurements of surface roughness and moisture content of rocky soils in a semiarid rangeland , 1998 .

[15]  Malcolm Davidson,et al.  On the characterization of agricultural soil roughness for radar remote sensing studies , 2000, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..