Buyout Option and Reserve Price in Online Auctions: Should I Bid or Buy Out?

This article examines the influences of two forms of buyout options – permanent (i.e., a buyer could buy out the item at any point during the entire bidding process) and temporary (i.e., buyout option ceases to be present once the bidding price exceeds the reserve price) – under the presence of reserve price on a buyer’s decision in online auctions. We propose that the presence of permanent buyout option leads a buyer to buy out instead of bidding. However, a buyer with temporary buyout option would attempt to bid above the reserve price so as to prevent other buyers from ending the auction prematurely. A series of controlled experiments was subsequently conducted to investigate the impact of buyout permanence (permanent versus temporary), price contrast (small versus large difference between the average clearance price and buyout price) and reserve price (low versus high) on a buyer’s behavior. The results support our conjecture by suggesting that a buyer is more likely to be loss averse and has a higher propensity to buy out in the presence of the permanent buyout option. However, when facing the temporary buyout option, a buyer becomes reserve-price conscious and is more likely to bid.

[1]  D. Putler Incorporating Reference Price Effects into a Theory of Consumer Choice , 1992 .

[2]  Alan Schwartz,et al.  Avoiding Future Regret in Purchase-Timing Decisions , 2001 .

[3]  David H. Reiley Auctions on the Internet: What's Being Auctioned, and How? , 2000 .

[4]  David H. Reiley,et al.  Public versus Secret Reserve Prices in eBay Auctions: Results from a Pokémon Field Experiment , 2007 .

[5]  M. F. Luce,et al.  Emotional Trade-Off Difficulty and Choice: , 1999 .

[6]  Lisa N. Takeyama,et al.  Buy prices in online auctions: irrationality on the internet? , 2001 .

[7]  Robert H. Schaffer,et al.  Aspiration-Level Adaptation in an American Financial Services Organization: A Field Study , 2002 .

[8]  Abraham Seidmann,et al.  Managing Online Auctions: Current Business and Research Issues , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[9]  S. Raj,et al.  Reference Price Research: Review and Propositions , 2005 .

[10]  D. Ariely,et al.  Buying, Bidding, Playing, or Competing? Value Assessment and Decision Dynamics in Online Auctions , 2003 .

[11]  Timothy Mathews,et al.  The Impact of Discounting on an Auction with a Buyout Option: a Theoretical Analysis Motivated by eBay’s Buy-It-Now Feature , 2004 .

[12]  M. Keane Modeling Heterogeneity and State Dependence in Consumer Choice Behavior , 1997 .

[13]  A. Roth,et al.  Last-Minute Bidding and the Rules for Ending Second-Price Auctions: Evidence from eBay and Amazon Auctions on the Internet , 2002 .

[14]  René Kirkegaard,et al.  Buy-Out Prices in Online Auctions: Multi-Unit Demand , 2003 .

[15]  Brett Katzman,et al.  The role of varying risk attitudes in an auction with a buyout option , 2006 .

[16]  Xue Yang,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of the Auction Buyer's Choice to Buy Out or Bid: Cry of Regret or Laugh of Satisfaction? , 2005, ICIS.

[17]  E. Greenleaf,et al.  Reserves, Regret, and Rejoicing in Open English Auctions , 2004 .

[18]  Praveen K. Kopalle,et al.  The impact of external reference price on consumer price expectations , 2003 .

[19]  Jérémie Gallien,et al.  Temporary and Permanent Buyout Prices in Online Auctions , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[20]  Joel Huber,et al.  The Impact of Anticipating Satisfaction on Consumer Choice , 2000 .

[21]  Vernon L. Smith,et al.  Bidding behavior in first price sealed bid auctions: Use of computerized Nash competitors , 1987 .

[22]  Charles A. Holt,et al.  Experiments investigating market power , 2002 .

[23]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .