Rapid Reviews Methods Series: Involving patient and public partners, healthcare providers and policymakers as knowledge users
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] M. Trivella,et al. Rapid reviews methods series: Guidance on team considerations, study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment , 2023, BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine.
[2] A. Booth,et al. Rapid reviews methods series: Guidance on literature search , 2023, BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine.
[3] A. Tricco,et al. Priority III: top 10 rapid review methodology research priorities identified using a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership , 2022, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[4] V. Welch,et al. Methodological guidance for incorporating equity when informing rapid-policy and guideline development , 2022, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[5] A. Tricco,et al. Moving from consultation to co-creation with knowledge users in scoping reviews: guidance from the JBI Scoping Review Methodology Group , 2022, JBI evidence synthesis.
[6] D. Mohr,et al. Evaluating the Impacts of Patient Engagement on Health Services Research Teams: Lessons from the Veteran Consulting Network , 2022, Journal of General Internal Medicine.
[7] J. Hoving,et al. Stakeholder Involvement in Systematic Reviews: Lessons From Cochrane's Public Health and Health Systems Network. , 2021, American journal of public health.
[8] C. Garritty,et al. Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviews , 2020, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.
[9] C. Garritty,et al. Defining Rapid Reviews: a systematic scoping review and thematic analysis of definitions and defining characteristics of rapid reviews. , 2020, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[10] D. Moher,et al. Assessing how information is packaged in rapid reviews for policy-makers and other stakeholders: a cross-sectional study , 2020, Health Research Policy and Systems.
[11] A. Fretheim,et al. Rapid reviews for rapid decision-making during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, Norway, 2020 , 2020, Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin.
[12] A. Majnemer,et al. Using a rapid review process to engage stakeholders, inform policy and set priorities for promoting physical activity and leisure participation for children with disabilities in British Columbia , 2020 .
[13] Jennifer E. Moore,et al. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality , 2020, Definitions.
[14] Abdullah Pandor,et al. Delphi consensus reached to produce a decision tool for SelecTing Approaches for Rapid Reviews (STARR). , 2019, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[15] A. Tricco,et al. Engaging knowledge users in a systematic review on the comparative effectiveness of geriatrician-led models of care is possible: A cross-sectional survey using the Patient Engagement Evaluation Tool. , 2019, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[16] M. Puhan,et al. Characteristics of stakeholder involvement in systematic and rapid reviews: a methodological review in the area of health services research , 2019, BMJ Open.
[17] Sophie Hill,et al. Development of the ACTIVE framework to describe stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews , 2019, Journal of health services research & policy.
[18] L. Forsythe,et al. Patient Engagement In Research: Early Findings From The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. , 2019, Health affairs.
[19] A. Tricco,et al. Using rapid reviews to strengthen health policy and systems and progress towards universal health coverage , 2019, BMJ Global Health.
[20] Clayon B Hamilton,et al. Development and pre-testing of the Patient Engagement In Research Scale (PEIRS) to assess the quality of engagement from a patient perspective , 2018, PloS one.
[21] A. Bishop,et al. Moving patient-oriented research forward: thoughts from the next generation of knowledge translation researchers , 2018, Research Involvement and Engagement.
[22] Michele. Kok,et al. Guidance document: Evaluating public involvement in research , 2018 .
[23] S. Redman,et al. Do policy-makers find commissioned rapid reviews useful? , 2018, Health Research Policy and Systems.
[24] A. Tricco,et al. Engaging policy-makers, heath system managers, and policy analysts in the knowledge synthesis process: a scoping review , 2018, Implementation Science.
[25] Meera Viswanathan,et al. The Use of Rapid Review Methods for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. , 2018, American journal of preventive medicine.
[26] Ruth Stewart,et al. How stakeholder engagement has led us to reconsider definitions of rigour in systematic reviews , 2017, Environmental Evidence.
[27] D G Altman,et al. GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research , 2017, British Medical Journal.
[28] Lisa Hartling,et al. Fit for purpose: perspectives on rapid reviews from end-user interviews , 2017, Systematic Reviews.
[29] S. Golder,et al. A systematic scoping review of the evidence for consumer involvement in organisations undertaking systematic reviews: focus on Cochrane , 2016, Research Involvement and Engagement.
[30] David Moher,et al. An international survey and modified Delphi approach revealed numerous rapid review methods. , 2016, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[31] Robin Paynter,et al. A taxonomy of rapid reviews links report types and methods to specific decision-making contexts. , 2015, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[32] Zachary Munn,et al. The Development and Use of Evidence Summaries for Point of Care Information Systems: A Streamlined Rapid Review Approach. , 2015, Worldviews on evidence-based nursing.
[33] L. Leslie,et al. A Systematic Review of Stakeholder Engagement in Comparative Effectiveness and Patient-Centered Outcomes Research , 2014, Journal of General Internal Medicine.
[34] Robin A. Paynter,et al. Defining the Benefits of Stakeholder Engagement in Systematic Reviews , 2014 .
[35] J. Hibbard,et al. What the evidence shows about patient activation: better health outcomes and care experiences; fewer data on costs. , 2013, Health affairs.
[36] Scott D Ramsey,et al. Stakeholder participation in comparative effectiveness research: defining a framework for effective engagement. , 2012, Journal of comparative effectiveness research.
[37] David Moher,et al. Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach , 2012, Systematic Reviews.
[38] Dwayne Van Eerd,et al. Stakeholder engagement opportunities in systematic reviews: knowledge transfer for policy and practice. , 2008, The Journal of continuing education in the health professions.
[39] P. Tugwell,et al. Consumer‐driven health care: Building partnerships in research , 2005, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.
[40] E. Corin. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Instituts Canadiens de Recherche en Santé (ICRS) SSHRC Strategic Themes/Themes strategiques du CRSHC The Canadian Health Services Research Foundation La Fondation Canadienne de la Recherche sur les Services de Santé MODERNITY, SUFFERING AND PSYCHOPATHO , 1999 .