Toward an inclusive semantic interoperability: the case of Cree hydrographic features

There has been ample work in GIScience on the formalization of ontologies but a relatively neglected area is the influence of language and culture on ontologies of geography. Although this subject has been investigated for conceptual ontologies using indigenous words denoting geographic features, this article represents the first attempt to develop a logical ontology with an indigenous group. The process of developing logical ontologies is here referred to as formalization. A methodology for formalizing ontologies with indigenous peoples is presented. A conceptual (human readable) ontology and a logical (axioms specified in mathematical logic) ontology were developed using this methodology. Research was conducted with the Cree, the largest indigenous language grouping in Canada. Results show that the geospatial ontology developed from Cree geographic concepts possesses unique design considerations: no superordinate classes were found from archival sources or Cree speakers so ontologies are structurally flat; the ontology contains some unique classes of water bodies; and the ontology challenges our notions of the generalizability of ontologies within indigenous groups. Whereas these difficulties are not insurmountable to the establishment of a cross-cultural Geospatial Semantic Web, the current plans of the World Wide Web Consortium do not adequately address them. We suggest future directions toward an inclusive semantic interoperability.

[1]  Hayley Mizen,et al.  Ontology Ontogeny: Understanding How an Ontology Is Created and Developed , 2005, GeoS.

[2]  R. Preston Cree narrative : expressing the personal meanings of events , 1975 .

[3]  John Goodwin Experiences of Using OWL at the Ordnance Survey , 2005, OWLED.

[4]  David J. Saab A conceptual investigation of the ontological commensurability of spatial data infrastructures among different cultures , 2009, Earth Sci. Informatics.

[5]  M. Bowerman Learning how to structure space for language: A crosslinguistic perspective , 1996 .

[6]  Andrew U. Frank,et al.  Tiers of ontology and consistency constraints in geographical information systems , 2001, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[7]  Karla A. V. Borges,et al.  Ontologies and Knowledge Sharing in Urban GIS , 2000 .

[8]  Stephan Winter,et al.  Ontology: buzzword or paradigm shift in GI science? , 2001, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[9]  Chris S. Duvall Classifying physical geographic features: the case of maninka farmers in southwestern mali , 2008 .

[10]  Vasant Honavar,et al.  Identifying and Eliminating Inconsistencies in Mappings across Hierarchical Ontologies , 2010, OTM Conferences.

[11]  Robert G. Raskin,et al.  Knowledge representation in the semantic web for Earth and environmental terminology (SWEET) , 2005, Comput. Geosci..

[12]  Nicola Guarino,et al.  Ontologies and Knowledge Bases. Towards a Terminological Clarification , 1995 .

[13]  Paul Nadasdy,et al.  THE POLITICS OF TEK: POWER AND THE "INTEGRATION" OF KNOWLEDGE , 1999 .

[14]  Barry Smith,et al.  Mereotopology: A Theory of Parts and Boundaries , 1996, Data Knowl. Eng..

[15]  Hayley Mizen,et al.  Tales of the River Bank, First Thoughts in the Development of a Topographic Ontology , 2004 .

[16]  Prostitution In Nevada,et al.  ANNALS of the Association of American Geographers , 1974 .

[17]  Robert A. Rundstrom GIS, Indigenous Peoples, and Epistemological Diversity , 1995 .

[18]  Dave Kolas,et al.  Geospatial semantic Web: architecture of ontologies , 2006, 2006 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[19]  Daniel Weiner,et al.  Community participation and geographic information systems. , 2002 .

[20]  Stephen C. Levinson,et al.  Language and landscape: a cross-linguistic perspective , 2008 .

[21]  C. Michael Sperberg-McQueen,et al.  World Wide Web Consortium , 2009, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.

[22]  M. Egenhofer,et al.  Topology of Prototypical Spatial Relations Between Lines and Regions in English and Spanish 1 , 1995 .

[23]  Marie-Odile Junker,et al.  Building Search Engines for Algonquian languages 1 , 2008 .

[24]  F. Harvey Developing geographic information infrastructures for local government: the role of trust , 2003 .

[25]  Digital Identity: The Construction of Virtual Selfhood in the Indigenous Peoples' Movement , 2005, Comparative Studies in Society and History.

[26]  Daniel Weiner,et al.  Ensuring access to GIS for marginal societies. , 2002 .

[27]  Stephan Winter,et al.  Formal information modelling for standardisation in the spatial domain , 2003, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[28]  Barry Smith,et al.  Do Mountains Exist? Towards an Ontology of Landforms , 2003 .

[29]  Jérôme Euzenat,et al.  Ten Challenges for Ontology Matching , 2008, OTM Conferences.

[30]  Boyan Brodaric,et al.  The design of GSC FieldLog: ontology-based software for computer aided geological field mapping , 2004, Comput. Geosci..

[31]  Torsten Hahmann,et al.  Ontology Verification with Repositories , 2010, FOIS.

[32]  Max J. Egenhofer,et al.  Toward the semantic geospatial web , 2002, GIS '02.

[33]  Robert A. Rundstrom,et al.  The Role of Ethics, Mapping, and the Meaning of Place in Relations Between Indians and Whites in the United States , 1993 .

[34]  Barry Smith,et al.  SNAP and SPAN: Towards Dynamic Spatial Ontology , 2004, Spatial Cogn. Comput..

[35]  P. Kay Taxonomy and Semantic Contrast , 1971 .

[36]  Werner Kuhn,et al.  Geospatial Semantics: Why, of What, and How? , 2005, J. Data Semant..

[37]  Frederico T. Fonseca,et al.  Using Ontologies for Integrated Geographic Information Systems , 2002, Trans. GIS.

[38]  Pragya Agarwal,et al.  Ontological considerations in GIScience , 2005, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[39]  Marie-Odile Junker,et al.  Developing Web Databases for Aboriginal Language Preservation , 2006, Lit. Linguistic Comput..

[40]  David M. Mark,et al.  Landscape Categories in Yindjibarndi: Ontology, Environment, and Language , 2003, COSIT.

[41]  David M. Mark,et al.  Progress on Yindjibarndi Ethnophysiography , 2007, COSIT.

[42]  Deborah L. McGuinness,et al.  OWL Web ontology language overview , 2004 .

[43]  Nadine Schuurman,et al.  Formalization Matters: Critical GIS and Ontology Research , 2006 .

[44]  Dave Kolas,et al.  Rule‐Based Discovery in Spatial Data Infrastructure , 2007, Trans. GIS.

[45]  Michael Uschold,et al.  Ontologies: principles, methods and applications , 1996, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[46]  J. Goodwin,et al.  Semantic interoperability between topographic data and a flood defence ontology , 2005 .

[47]  R. E. Sieber,et al.  Rewiring for a GIS/2 , 2004, Cartogr. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Geovisualization.

[48]  John G. Stell,et al.  A Qualitative Account of Discrete Space , 2002, GIScience.

[49]  Adam Pease,et al.  The Suggested Upper Merged Ontology: A Large Ontology for the Semantic Web and its Applic ations , 2002 .

[50]  Liam Magee A framework for assessing commensurability of semantic web ontologies , 2010 .

[51]  George A. Miller,et al.  Nouns in WordNet: A Lexical Inheritance System , 1990 .

[52]  Steffen Staab,et al.  WonderWeb: Ontology Infrastructure for the Semantic Web , 2004 .

[53]  James A. Hendler,et al.  The Semantic Web: A new form of Web content that is meaningful to computers will unleash a revolution of new possibilities , 2001 .