The use of a multi‐attribute tool for evaluating accessibility in buildings: the AHP approach

Purpose – The purpose of this article is to develop a quantitative building accessibility assessment model for the construction industry. Design/methodology/approach – The building accessibility assessment criteria are incorporated in a hierarchy structure based on the relevant building regulations and British standards. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is employed to determine the priority of the accessibility criteria. A review of the application of AHP is included in the paper. Finally, a case scenario is used to illustrate the method. Findings – This paper provides a methodology to prioritize the building accessibility criteria and to indicate how well a building design meets accessibility requirements quantitatively. Practical limitations/implications – A model is advocated for use by accessibility consultants and building designers to establish a quantitative assessment for building accessibility. It can also be used in the development of accessibility assessment software. Originality/value – This paper presents a novel quantitative building accessibility assessment model.

[1]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Forecasting foreign exchange rates: an expert judgment approach , 1987 .

[2]  Rajiv Kohli,et al.  A multiple criteria assessment of decision technology system journal quality , 2001, Inf. Manag..

[3]  Joseph L. Zinnes,et al.  A Thurstonian view of the analytic hierarchy process , 1996 .

[4]  Dong Cao,et al.  On the efficacy of modeling multi-attribute decision problems using AHP and Sinarchy , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1990 .

[6]  Munirpallam A. Venkataramanan,et al.  Capturing group preferences in a multicriteria decision , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  The Peruvian Hostage Crisis of 1996–1997: What Should the Government Do? , 1997 .

[8]  Marc J. Schniederjans,et al.  A Two‐stage Model for Structuring Global Facility Site Selection Decisions , 1994 .

[9]  Fatemeh Zahedi,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process—A Survey of the Method and its Applications , 1986 .

[10]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Establishment of Critical Success Factors for Construction Partnering , 2000 .

[11]  Raykun R. Tan,et al.  On the quality of construction engineering design projects , 1995 .

[12]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Decision making with dependence and feedback : the analytic network process : the organization and prioritization of complexity , 1996 .

[13]  K. Hafeez,et al.  Determining key capabilities of a firm using analytic hierarchy process , 2002 .

[14]  Andrew N. Baldwin,et al.  Estimating and Tendering for Civil Engineering Works , 1991 .

[15]  Zahir Irani,et al.  A generic conceptual framework for a Total Information Networking System in construction , 2002, Int. J. Serv. Technol. Manag..

[16]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Decision Making for Leaders: The Analytical Hierarchy Process for Decisions in a Complex World , 1982 .

[17]  A. Smilde,et al.  Multicriteria decision making , 1992 .

[18]  Dae-Ho Byun,et al.  The AHP approach for selecting an automobile purchase model , 2001, Inf. Manag..

[19]  Thomas J. Crowe,et al.  Multi‐attribute analysis of ISO 9000 registration using AHP , 1998 .

[20]  Keith Bright,et al.  The Access Manual , 2006 .

[21]  Matthew J. Liberatore,et al.  The Evaluation of Research Papers (Or How to Get an Academic Committee to Agree on Something) , 1992 .

[22]  Chyan Yang,et al.  A decision model for IS outsourcing , 2000, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[23]  V. M. Rao Tummala,et al.  An application of the AHP in vendor selection of a telecommunications system , 2001 .

[24]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  A new macroeconomic forecasting and policy evaluation method using the analytic hierarchy process , 1987 .

[25]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Partnering research in construction , 2000 .

[26]  Radhika Santhanam,et al.  Using the analytic hierarchy process for information system project selection , 1990, Inf. Manag..

[27]  Bo K. Wong,et al.  Software selection: a case study of the application of the analytical hierarchical process to the selection of a multimedia authoring system , 1999, Inf. Manag..

[28]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Oil Prices: 1985 and 1990 , 1982 .

[29]  Jiaqin Yang,et al.  AN AHP DECISION MODEL FOR FACILITY LOCATION SELECTION , 1997 .

[30]  Heng Li,et al.  RANKING OF CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION FOR VARIOUS FUNCTIONS OF THE GENERAL CONTRACTORS: A PRELIMINARY STUDY , 2002 .

[31]  T. Saaty.  Highlights and critical points in the theory and application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1994 .

[32]  Xiande Zhao,et al.  An application of quality function deployment to improve the quality of teaching , 1998 .

[33]  Matthew J. Liberatore,et al.  An extension of the analytic hierarchy process for industrial R&D project selection and resource allocation , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[34]  Ken Platts,et al.  A Process Approach to Researching Manufacturing Strategy , 1993 .

[35]  L. D. Boer,et al.  A review of methods supporting supplier selection , 2001 .

[36]  Ronald McCaffer,et al.  Management information flow in construction companies , 1988 .

[37]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[38]  Eddie W.L. Cheng,et al.  Information priority-setting for better resource allocation using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) , 2001, Inf. Manag. Comput. Secur..

[39]  L. V. D. Wegen,et al.  Outranking methods in support of supplier selection , 1998 .

[40]  Colin O. Benjamin,et al.  A knowledge-based decision support system for locating a manufacturing facility , 1995 .

[41]  Andy Neely,et al.  Testing manufacturing strategy formulation processes , 1998 .

[42]  Fariborz Y. Partovi,et al.  Determining What to Benchmark: An Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach , 1994 .

[43]  M. Badri,et al.  Decision support models for the location of firms in industrial sites , 1995 .

[44]  Eddie Anderson,et al.  Operations Management—Strategy and Analysis , 1987 .