Social Informatics: Principles, Theory, and Practice

Through this paper we make two contributions to social informatics: the interdisciplinary study of the design, development, uses and consequences of information and communication technologies that takes into account their interaction with institutional and cultural contexts. Our first contribution is to make a connection from social informatics to general principles of socio-technical theories. We do this to both connect social informatics scholarship more directly to the large and growing literature(s) that engage socio-technical theorizing and to advance these principles more directly through social informatics. Our second contribution to social informatics is to engage two contemporary theoretical approaches that draw on social informatics principles: socio-technical interaction networks and principles of social actors and apply them to current practice. We do so to demonstrate that these analytic approaches are the needed tools to help scholars and reflective professionals in practice engage social informatics analyses. By doing this we highlight the potential of social informatics while honouring Rob Kling’s legacy in helping to establish this transdiscipline.

[1]  Trevor Wood-Harper,et al.  Multiview as social informatics in action: past, present and future , 2005, Inf. Technol. People.

[2]  Steve Sawyer,et al.  Information Systems in Organizations and Society: Speculating on the Next 25 Years of Research , 2004, Relevant Theory and Informed Practice.

[3]  L BaskervilleRichard,et al.  Information systems as a reference discipline , 2002 .

[4]  L. Winner.  The Whale and the Reactor , 2020 .

[5]  April Pattavina.  Information technology and the criminal justice system , 2005 .

[6]  J. Fleck.  Learning by trying: the implementation of configurational technology☆ , 1994 .

[7]  Steve Sawyer,et al.  Understanding and Communicating Social Informatics: A Framework for Studying and Teaching the Human Contexts of Information and Communication Technologies , 2005, Program.

[8]  R. Lamb,et al.  Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change , 1996, Inf. Process. Manag..

[9]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Information Systems as a Reference Discipline , 2002, MIS Q..

[10]  Linda S. Lotto.  Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods , 1986 .

[11]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Technology and Institutions: What Can Research on Information Technology and Research on Organizations Learn from Each Other? , 2001, MIS Q..

[12]  Terence Dunworth,et al.  Information Technology and the Criminal Justice System: An Historical Overview , 2005 .

[13]  Robin Mansell.  Social informatics and the political economy of communications , 2005, Inf. Technol. People.

[14]  Paul Quintas,et al.  Programmed Innovation? Trajectories of Change in Software Development , 1994 .

[15]  Lucy Suchman.  Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication , 1987 .

[16]  P. Agre.  Lucy A. Suchman, Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Commuinication (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1987) , 1990, Artif. Intell..

[17]  M. D. Myers,et al.  Global and Organizational Discourse about Information Technology , 2003, IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing.

[18]  Rob Kling,et al.  a Bit More to It: Scholarly Communication Forums as Socio-technical Interaction Networks , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[19]  T. D. Wilson,et al.  Review of: Kling, R., Rosenbaum, H. & Sawyer, S. Understanding and communicating social informatics: a framework for studying and teaching the human contexts of information and communication technologies. Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc., 2005 , 2006, Information Research.

[20]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  Shaping Electronic Communication: The Metastructuring of Technology in the Context of Use , 1995 .

[21]  Rob Kling,et al.  Reconceptualizing Users as Social Actors in Information Systems Research , 2003, MIS Q..

[22]  Trevor Wood-Harper,et al.  Exploring sociotechnical interaction with Rob Kling: five "big" ideas , 2005, Inf. Technol. People.

[23]  Terence Dunworth,et al.  Criminal Justice and the IT Revolution by Terence Dunworth , 2000 .

[24]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Figuring Service in Discourses of ICT: The Case of Software Agents , 2002, Global and Organizational Discourse about Information Technology.

[25]  John H. Pencavel.  Believing what we cannot prove , 1986 .

[26]  Rob Kling,et al.  What Is Social Informatics and Why Does It Matter? , 2007, D Lib Mag..

[27]  Charles F. Kielkopf.  Abusing Science: The Case against Creationism , 1985 .

[28]  J. Ziman,et al.  Public knowledge. An essay concerning the social dimension of science , 1970, Medical History.

[29]  Amanda Hoey,et al.  Techno-cops: information technology and law enforcement , 1998, Int. J. Law Inf. Technol..

[30]  Merrick E. Krause,et al.  The 9/11 Commission Report: Final Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks upon the United States , 2004 .

[31]  Steve Sawyer,et al.  On extending social informatics from a rich legacy of networks and conceptual resources , 2005, Inf. Technol. People.

[32]  Steve Sawyer,et al.  Mobility and the first responder , 2004, CACM.

[33]  W. Scott,et al.  Institutions and Organizations. , 1995 .

[34]  P. Kitcher,et al.  Abusing Science, the Case against Creationism , 1984 .

[35]  Cameron Lawrence,et al.  Institutions and Organizations (2nd ed.) , 2003 .

[36]  Norman Campbell,et al.  What is Science , 1953 .

[37]  Lee S. Strickland,et al.  Analytic myopia, data disintegration and homeland insecurity , 2005 .

[38]  S. Sawyer.  Social informatics: Overview, principles and opportunities , 2006 .

[39]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[40]  Jeff Hildebrandt,et al.  What is Science , 1996 .