Reconciling Theories with Design Choices in Design Science Research

Despite increased acceptance of design science research, concerns about rigor and relevance permeate the research community. One way to increase rigor is by codifying design knowledge into design theories. While this idea is gaining popularity, it is unclear how to approach design theorizing in a scientifically rigorous, yet practically relevant, way. In this paper, we address one particularly murky issue in design science research: reconciling theoretical abstractness with practicality. Since many design theories are moderately abstract, a gap exists between theoretical propositions and concrete issues faced in practice. We present a case study of real information system (IS) development where these issues become evident. Based on the identified issues we provide four theory-driven recommendations including specification of transformational rules, developing or imagining a real IS artifact, specification of boundary conditions and over-specification of the theoretical core. The consequences of these recommendations for design science theorizing are discussed.

[1]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  Causality: the elephant in the room in information systems epistemology , 2011, ECIS.

[2]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Nature of Theory in Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..

[3]  Paulo Rupino da Cunha,et al.  Action Research and Design in Information Systems , 2007 .

[4]  T. J. Teorey,et al.  A logical design methodology for relational databases using the extended entity-relationship model , 1986, CSUR.

[5]  Yair Wand,et al.  Emancipating instances from the tyranny of classes in information modeling , 2000, TODS.

[6]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model , 2003, MIS Q..

[7]  Allen S. Lee.  A Scientific Methodology for MIS Case Studies , 1989, MIS Q..

[8]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Building an Information System Design Theory for Vigilant EIS , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[9]  D. E. Avison.  Advances in Information Systems Research, Education and Practice - IFIP 20th World Computer Congress, TC 8, Information Systems, September 7-10, 2008, Milano, Italy , 2008, Advances in Information Systems Research, Education and Practice.

[10]  Maria-Eugenia Iacob,et al.  In Search of Paradigms : identifying the theoretical foundations of the information system field , 2010 .

[11]  Avi Goldfarb,et al.  How Is the Mobile Internet Different? Search Costs and Local Activities , 2013, Inf. Syst. Res..

[12]  Roman Lukyanenko,et al.  Conceptual modeling principles for crowdsourcing , 2012, CrowdSens '12.

[13]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[14]  Katherine Rowland.  Citizen science goes 'extreme' , 2012, Nature.

[15]  E. F. Codd,et al.  Relational database: a practical foundation for productivity , 1982, CACM.

[16]  Marcio Antelio,et al.  Qualitocracy: A data quality collaborative framework applied to citizen science , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC).

[17]  Roman Lukyanenko,et al.  Citizen Science 2.0: Data Management Principles to Harness the Power of the Crowd , 2011, DESRIST.

[18]  J. Silvertown.  A new dawn for citizen science. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[19]  Dennis F. Galletta,et al.  Human-Computer Interaction and Management Information Systems – Foundations , 2006 .

[20]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Research Commentary: Rethinking "Diversity" in Information Systems Research , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[21]  Vijay K. Vaishnavi,et al.  Theory Development in Design Science Research: Anatomy of a Research Project , 2008 .

[22]  Sandeep Purao,et al.  Exploring the Limits of the Possible , 2007 .

[23]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Minimalist Program , 1992 .

[24]  John R. Venable,et al.  The role of theory and theorising in Design Science research , 2006 .

[25]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  Untangling causality in design science theorizing , 2010 .

[26]  E. Hand,et al.  Citizen science: People power , 2010, Nature.

[27]  Pertti Järvinen,et al.  Mapping Research Questions to Research Methods , 2008, Advances in Information Systems Research, Education and Practice.

[28]  J. Venable.  Incorporating design science research and critical research into an introductory business research methods course , 2011 .

[29]  Jordan Raddick,et al.  Galaxy Zoo: Morphological Classification and Citizen Science , 2011, 1104.5513.

[30]  K. Weick.  Theory Construction as Disciplined Reflexivity: Tradeoffs in the 90s , 1999 .

[31]  A. Adam.  Whatever happened to information systems ethics? Caught between the devil and the deep blue sea , 2004 .

[32]  Steve Kelling,et al.  Data-intensive science applied to broad-scale citizen science. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[33]  R. Merton.  Social Theory and Social Structure , 1958 .

[34]  K. Weick.  Theory Construction as Disciplined Imagination , 1989 .

[35]  Juhani Iivari,et al.  Nothing is as Clear as Unclear: Iivari's response , 2007, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[36]  Juhani Iivari,et al.  A Paradigmatic Analysis of Information Systems As a Design Science , 2007, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[37]  Helmut Krcmar,et al.  Long Live Design Science Research! .... and Remind Me Again About Whether It Is a New Research Paradigm or a Rationale of Last Resort for Worthwhile Research That Doesn't Fit Under Any Other Umbrella , 2012, ICIS.

[38]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[39]  Salvatore T. March,et al.  Design and natural science research on information technology , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[40]  Veda C. Storey,et al.  Reverse Engineering of Relational Databases: Extraction of an EER Model from a Relational Database , 1994, Data Knowl. Eng..

[41]  A. Tversky.  Features of Similarity , 1977 .

[42]  M. E. Gredler,et al.  Does No One Read Vygotsky’s Words? Commentary on Glassman , 2004 .

[43]  Peter A. Bamberger,et al.  From the Editors Beyond Contextualization: Using Context Theories to Narrow the Micro-Macro Gap in Management Research , 2008 .

[44]  Mike Chiasson,et al.  Long Live Design Science Research , 2012, ICIS 2012.

[45]  Joseph Feller,et al.  Procedurally Transparent Design Science Research: A Design Process Model , 2012, ICIS.

[46]  Martin J. Eppler,et al.  A Structured Approach for Designing Collaboration Experiences for Virtual Worlds , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[47]  Ron Weber,et al.  Evaluating and Developing Theories in the Information Systems Discipline , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[48]  Robert O. Briggs,et al.  Design Theory in Practice - Making Design Science Research More Transparent , 2011, DESRIST.

[49]  Ron Weber,et al.  On the deep structure of information systems , 1995, Inf. Syst. J..

[50]  Roman Lukyanenko,et al.  Easier citizen science is better , 2011, Nature.

[51]  Ofer Arazy,et al.  A Theory-Driven Design Framework for Social Recommender Systems , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[52]  Joerg Evermann.  Applying Cognitive Principles of Similarity to Data Integration - The Case of SIAM , 2012, AMCIS.

[53]  Vijay K. Vaishnavi,et al.  A Framework for Theory Development in Design Science Research: Multiple Perspectives , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[54]  Sandeep Purao,et al.  Being Proactive: Where Action Research Meets Design Research , 2005, ICIS.

[55]  ChenPeter Pin-Shan.  The entity-relationship modeltoward a unified view of data , 1976 .

[56]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Introduction to the special issue on design science , 2011, Inf. Syst. E Bus. Manag..

[57]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Crisis in the IS Field? A Critical Reflection on the State of the Discipline , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[58]  Roman Lukyanenko,et al.  Rethinking data quality as an outcome of conceptual modeling choices , 2011, ICIQ.

[59]  Hemant Jain,et al.  Service-Oriented Perspectives in Design Science Research , 2011, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[60]  K. Weick.  What Theory Is Not, Theorizing Is , 1995 .

[61]  Jonathan Silvertown,et al.  Taxonomy: include social networking , 2010, Nature.

[62]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  What Theory is Not , 1995 .

[63]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Anatomy of a Design Theory , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[64]  Yair Wand,et al.  Using Cognitive Principles to Guide Classification in Information Systems Modeling , 2008, MIS Q..

[65]  Sandeep Purao,et al.  Action Design Research , 2011, MIS Q..

[66]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Gaming for (Citizen) Science: Exploring Motivation and Data Quality in the Context of Crowdsourced Science through the Design and Evaluation of a Social-Computational System , 2011, 2011 IEEE Seventh International Conference on e-Science Workshops.