Improving modified tardieu scale assessment using inertial measurement unit with visual biofeedback

Reliable spasticity assessment is important to provide appropriate intervention for spasticity. Modified Tardieu scale (MTS) assessment is simple and convenient enough to be used in clinical environment, but has poor or moderate reliability due to irregular passive stretch velocity and goniometric measurement. We proposed a novel inertial measurement unit (IMU)-based MTS assessment with gyroscope-based visual biofeedback to improve the reliability of MTS by providing regular passive stretch velocity. With five children with cerebral palsy and two raters, the IMU-based MTS assessment was compared with conventional MTS assessment. The results showed that the proposed one has good test-retest and inter-rater reliabilities (ICC > .08) while the conventional MTS has poor or moderate reliability. Moreover, it was shown that the proposed visual biofeedback is effective enough to provide regular passive stretch velocity.

[1]  Adrienne L Fosang M Physio BAppSc,et al.  Measures of muscle and joint performance in the lower limb of children with cerebral palsy , 2007 .

[2]  Mary P. Galea,et al.  Measures of muscle and joint performance in the lower limb of children with cerebral palsy. , 2003 .

[3]  Jonghyun Kim,et al.  Simple ambulatory gait monitoring system using a single IMU for various daily-life gait activities , 2016, 2016 IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics (BHI).

[4]  Roslyn N. Boyd,et al.  Objective measurement of clinical findings in the use of botulinum toxin type A for the management of children with cerebral palsy , 1999 .

[5]  Darcy Fehlings,et al.  Reliability of the Tardieu Scale for assessing spasticity in children with cerebral palsy. , 2010, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[6]  C Tardieu,et al.  Mechanical Evaluation and Conservative Correction of Limb Joint Contractures , 1987 .

[7]  Louise Ada,et al.  The Tardieu Scale differentiates contracture from spasticity whereas the Ashworth Scale is confounded by it , 2006, Clinical rehabilitation.

[8]  G. Johnson,et al.  A systematic review of the Tardieu Scale for the measurement of spasticity , 2006, Disability and rehabilitation.

[9]  Yupeng Ren,et al.  Characterization of spasticity in cerebral palsy: dependence of catch angle on velocity , 2010, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[10]  Anita Beelen,et al.  Clinical assessment of spasticity in children with cerebral palsy: a critical review of available instruments , 2005, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[11]  N. Mayer,et al.  Clinicophysiologic concepts of spasticity and motor dysfunction in adults with an upper motoneuron lesion , 1997, Muscle & nerve. Supplement.

[12]  Peter H. Veltink,et al.  Measuring orientation of human body segments using miniature gyroscopes and accelerometers , 2005, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[13]  Henk J Stam,et al.  Excellent test-retest and inter-rater reliability for Tardieu Scale measurements with inertial sensors in elbow flexors of stroke patients. , 2011, Gait & posture.

[14]  Rainer Koch,et al.  Reliability of the Modified Tardieu Scale and the Modified Ashworth Scale in adult patients with severe brain injury: a comparison study , 2005, Clinical rehabilitation.

[15]  K. Krigger.  Cerebral palsy: an overview. , 2006, American family physician.

[16]  R Colombo,et al.  Lower limb spasticity assessment using an inertial sensor: a reliability study , 2013, Physiological measurement.

[17]  Josien C van den Noort,et al.  Evaluation of clinical spasticity assessment in cerebral palsy using inertial sensors. , 2009, Gait & posture.

[18]  Symposium synopsis , 1986 .