A unified method for computing position and orientation workspaces of general Stewart platforms

The workspace of a Stewart platform is a complex six- dimensional volume embedded in the Cartesian space defined b y six pose parameters. Because of its large dimension and com- plex shape, such workspace is difficult to compute and repres ent, so that comprehension on its structure is being gained by stu dy- ing its three-dimensional slices. While successful method s have been given to determine the constant-orientation slice, th e com- putation and appropriate visualization of the constant-po sition slice (also known as the orientation workspace) has proved t o be a challenging task. This paper presents a unified method fo r computing both of such slices, and any other ones defined by fixing three pose parameters, on general Stewart platforms i n- volving mechanical limits on the active and passive joints. Ad- ditional advantages over previous methods include the abil ity to determine all connected components of the workspace, and an y motion barriers present in its interior.

[1]  Jean-Pierre Merlet Determination of 6D Workspaces of Gough-Type Parallel Manipulator and Comparison between Different Geometries , 1999, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[2]  C. Gosselin Determination of the Workspace of 6-DOF Parallel Manipulators , 1990 .

[3]  Federico Thomas,et al.  A Linear Relaxation Technique for the Position Analysis of Multiloop Linkages , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[4]  Thierry Siméon,et al.  Probabilistic motion planning for parallel mechanisms , 2003, 2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.03CH37422).

[5]  Leo Joskowicz,et al.  Bone-mounted miniature robot for surgical procedures: Concept and clinical applications , 2003, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[6]  Roelof G. van Silfhout,et al.  HIGH-PRECISION HYDRAULIC STEWART PLATFORM , 1999 .

[7]  Jeha Ryu,et al.  Orientation workspace analysis of 6-DOF parallel manipulators , 1999 .

[8]  Lotfi Romdhane Orientation workspace of fully parallel mechanisms , 1994 .

[9]  Manfred Husty,et al.  Workspace Analysis of Stewart-Gough-Type Parallel Manipulators , 2006 .

[10]  M PortaJosep,et al.  A linear relaxation technique for the position analysis of multiloop linkages , 2009 .

[11]  F. A. Adkins,et al.  Numerical Algorithms for Mapping Boundaries of Manipulator Workspaces , 1996 .

[12]  Jean-Pierre Merlet,et al.  Determination of the orientation workspace of parallel manipulators , 1995, J. Intell. Robotic Syst..

[13]  Clément Gosselin,et al.  Analytical determination of the workspace of symmetrical spherical parallel mechanisms , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[14]  Edward J. Haug,et al.  On the determination of boundaries to manipulator workspaces , 1997 .

[15]  D. Stewart,et al.  A Platform with Six Degrees of Freedom , 1965 .

[16]  Dein Shaw,et al.  Cutting path generation of the Stewart-Platform-Based Milling Machine using an end-mill , 2001 .

[17]  Bhaskar Dasgupta,et al.  The Stewart platform manipulator: a review , 2000 .

[18]  Clément Gosselin,et al.  Evaluation and Representation of the Theoretical Orientation Workspace of the Gough–Stewart Platform , 2009 .

[19]  J. Cort,et al.  Probabilistic Motion Planning for Parallel Mechanisms , 2003 .

[20]  André Preumont,et al.  A six-axis single-stage active vibration isolator based on Stewart platform , 2005 .

[21]  K. Y. Tsai,et al.  Determining the compatible orientation workspace of Stewart–Gough parallel manipulators , 2006 .