Improving the power of association tests for quantitative traits in family studies

Association mapping based on family studies can identify genes that influence complex human traits while providing protection against population stratification. Because no gene is likely to have a very large effect on a complex trait, most family studies have limited power. Among the commonly used family‐based tests of association for quantitative traits, the quantitative transmission‐disequilibrium tests (QTDT) based on the variance‐components model is the most flexible and most powerful. This method assumes that the trait values are normally distributed. Departures from normality can inflate the type I error and reduce the power. Although the family‐based association tests (FBAT) and pedigree disequilibrium tests (PDT) do not require normal traits, nonnormality can also result in loss of power. In many cases, approximate normality can be achieved by transforming the trait values. However, the true transformation is unknown, and incorrect transformations may compromise the type I error and power. We propose a novel class of association tests for arbitrarily distributed quantitative traits by allowing the true transformation function to be completely unspecified and empirically estimated from the data. Extensive simulation studies showed that the new methods provide accurate control of the type I error and can be substantially more powerful than the existing methods. We applied the new methods to the Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Alcoholism and discovered significant association of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) tsc0022400 on chromosome 7 with the quantitative electrophysiological phenotype TTTH1, which was not detected by any existing methods. We have implemented the new methods in a freely available computer program. Genet. Epidemiol. 2006. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  K. Liang,et al.  Asymptotic Properties of Maximum Likelihood Estimators and Likelihood Ratio Tests under Nonstandard Conditions , 1987 .

[2]  Christoph Lange,et al.  Power and design considerations for a general class of family-based association tests: quantitative traits. , 2002, American journal of human genetics.

[3]  N L Kaplan,et al.  Removing the sampling restrictions from family-based tests of association for a quantitative-trait locus. , 2000, American journal of human genetics.

[4]  J K Hewitt,et al.  Combined linkage and association sib-pair analysis for quantitative traits. , 1999, American journal of human genetics.

[5]  E. Kistner,et al.  Method for using complete and incomplete trios to identify genes related to a quantitative trait , 2004, Genetic epidemiology.

[6]  L. Bierut,et al.  Familial transmission of substance dependence: alcohol, marijuana, cocaine, and habitual smoking: a report from the Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Alcoholism. , 1998, Archives of general psychiatry.

[7]  N. Risch Searching for genetic determinants in the new millennium , 2000, Nature.

[8]  B S Weir,et al.  Tests for linkage and association in nuclear families. , 1997, American journal of human genetics.

[9]  J. Huang,et al.  A score-statistic approach for the mapping of quantitative-trait loci with sibships of arbitrary size. , 2002, American journal of human genetics.

[10]  D J Schaid,et al.  Comparison of statistics for candidate-gene association studies using cases and parents. , 1994, American journal of human genetics.

[11]  G. Abecasis,et al.  Merlin—rapid analysis of dense genetic maps using sparse gene flow trees , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[12]  M. Daly,et al.  A map of human genome sequence variation containing 1.42 million single nucleotide polymorphisms , 2001, Nature.

[13]  Xin Xu,et al.  Implementing a unified approach to family‐based tests of association , 2000, Genetic epidemiology.

[14]  L Kruglyak,et al.  Parametric and nonparametric linkage analysis: a unified multipoint approach. , 1996, American journal of human genetics.

[15]  P. Bickel Efficient and Adaptive Estimation for Semiparametric Models , 1993 .

[16]  W. Ewens,et al.  A sibship test for linkage in the presence of association: the sib transmission/disequilibrium test. , 1998, American journal of human genetics.

[17]  G. Abecasis,et al.  A general test of association for quantitative traits in nuclear families. , 2000, American journal of human genetics.

[18]  D Y Lin,et al.  A powerful and robust method for mapping quantitative trait loci in general pedigrees. , 2005, American journal of human genetics.

[19]  Lon R. Cardon,et al.  Some Properties of a Variance Components Model for Fine-Mapping Quantitative Trait Loci , 2000, Behavior genetics.

[20]  N M Laird,et al.  Family-based tests of association and linkage that use unaffected sibs, covariates, and interactions. , 2000, American journal of human genetics.

[21]  M. Olivier A haplotype map of the human genome. , 2003, Nature.

[22]  Daniel Rabinowitz,et al.  A Unified Approach to Adjusting Association Tests for Population Admixture with Arbitrary Pedigree Structure and Arbitrary Missing Marker Information , 2000, Human Heredity.

[23]  C. Amos Robust variance-components approach for assessing genetic linkage in pedigrees. , 1994, American journal of human genetics.

[24]  M. Zago,et al.  Diversity of the human Y chromosome of South American Amerindians: a comparison with Blacks, Whites, and Japanese from Brazil , 1997, Annals of human genetics.

[25]  N M Laird,et al.  A discordant-sibship test for disequilibrium and linkage: no need for parental data. , 1998, American journal of human genetics.

[26]  W. Ewens,et al.  Transmission test for linkage disequilibrium: the insulin gene region and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). , 1993, American journal of human genetics.

[27]  L. Almasy,et al.  Multipoint quantitative-trait linkage analysis in general pedigrees. , 1998, American journal of human genetics.

[28]  D. Y. Lin,et al.  An efficient Monte Carlo approach to assessing statistical significance in genomic studies , 2005, Bioinform..

[29]  D. Botstein,et al.  Discovering genotypes underlying human phenotypes: past successes for mendelian disease, future approaches for complex disease , 2003, Nature Genetics.

[30]  M. Boehnke,et al.  Genetic association mapping based on discordant sib pairs: the discordant-alleles test. , 1998, American journal of human genetics.

[31]  D. Lin,et al.  Semiparametric Methods for Mapping Quantitative Trait Loci with Censored Data , 2005, Biometrics.

[32]  M. Olivier A haplotype map of the human genome , 2003, Nature.

[33]  E. Martin,et al.  Sibling-based tests of linkage and association for quantitative traits. , 1999, American journal of human genetics.

[34]  William H. Press,et al.  The Art of Scientific Computing Second Edition , 1998 .

[35]  D J Schaid,et al.  Genotype relative risks: methods for design and analysis of candidate-gene association studies. , 1993, American journal of human genetics.

[36]  D. Allison,et al.  Transmission-disequilibrium tests for quantitative traits. , 1997, American journal of human genetics.

[37]  G. Abecasis,et al.  Pedigree tests of transmission disequilibrium , 2000, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[38]  Christoph Lange,et al.  Family‐based association tests for survival and times‐to‐onset analysis , 2004, Statistics in medicine.

[39]  D Rabinowitz,et al.  A transmission disequilibrium test for quantitative trait loci. , 1997, Human heredity.

[40]  John P. Rice,et al.  Linkage and linkage disequilibrium mapping of ERP and EEG phenotypes , 2002, Biological Psychology.

[41]  R C Elston,et al.  Transmission/disequilibrium tests for quantitative traits , 2001, Genetic epidemiology.

[42]  E. Kistner,et al.  A method for identifying genes related to a quantitative trait, incorporating multiple siblings and missing parents , 2005, Genetic epidemiology.

[43]  E. Martin,et al.  A test for linkage and association in general pedigrees: the pedigree disequilibrium test. , 2000, American journal of human genetics.