Benefit Evaluation of All-Optical Subchannel Add–Drop in Flexible Optical Networks

Recent advances in switching technology have enabled the all-optical add/drop of low-rate signals to/from flexigrid superchannels empowering all-optical traffic grooming (AOTG) as an alternative to electronic grooming, e.g., OTN. This capability promises more efficient resource utilization and cost savings in future transport networks. To quantify the potential benefits of AOTG, in this paper, we carry out a thorough and holistic techno-economic analysis. We first review the AOTG-enabling technologies and then compare the performance of the AOTG-based solution with that of alternative optically transparent and OTN-based solutions in a planning scenario over a national-scale network in France. Our results show that AOTG outperforms benchmarks in terms of both spectrum utilization and cost, leading to ~120% cumulative return of investment over a period of nine years and blocking-free network lifespan extension. Compared with the OTN-based solution, AOTG is demonstrated to bring up to 50% cost reduction.

[1]  I. Tomkos,et al.  A novel architecture for all-optical add-drop multiplexing of OFDM signals , 2014, 2014 The European Conference on Optical Communication (ECOC).

[2]  I. Tomkos,et al.  Impairment-aware resource allocation over flexi-grid network with all-optical add/drop capability , 2015, 2015 European Conference on Optical Communication (ECOC).

[3]  P. Poggiolini,et al.  Nyquist-WDM-Based Flexible Optical Networks: Exploring Physical Layer Design Parameters , 2013, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[4]  J. Y. Yen An algorithm for finding shortest routes from all source nodes to a given destination in general networks , 1970 .

[5]  P. Poggiolini,et al.  The GN-Model of Fiber Non-Linear Propagation and its Applications , 2014, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[6]  Ioannis Tomkos,et al.  Cost and power consumption model for flexible super-channel transmission with all-optical sub-channel add/drop capability , 2015, 2015 17th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks (ICTON).

[7]  P. Zakynthinos,et al.  Value analysis methodology for flexible optical networks , 2011, 2011 37th European Conference and Exhibition on Optical Communication.

[8]  Emile H. L. Aarts,et al.  Global optimization and simulated annealing , 1991, Math. Program..

[9]  E. Pincemin,et al.  Electrical v/s optical aggregation in multi-layer optical transport networks , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Photonics in Switching (PS).

[10]  Peter J. Winzer,et al.  Spatial Multiplexing in Fiber Optics: The 10X Scaling of Metro/Core Capacities , 2014, Bell Labs Tech. J..

[11]  I. Tomkos,et al.  Techno-economic analysis of flexi-grid networks with all-optical add/drop capability , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Photonics in Switching (PS).

[12]  Ioannis Tomkos,et al.  A tutorial on the flexible optical networking paradigm: State of the art, trends, and research challenges , 2014, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[13]  I. Tomkos,et al.  All-optical vs. electrical aggregations CAPEX comparisons in a fully-flexible multi-layer transport network , 2015, 2015 European Conference on Optical Communication (ECOC).

[14]  M. Nazarathy,et al.  Sub-banded / single-sub-carrier drop-demux and flexible spectral shaping with a fine resolution photonic processor , 2014, 2014 The European Conference on Optical Communication (ECOC).

[15]  Erwan Pincemin,et al.  Multi-Band OFDM Transmission at 100 Gbps With Sub-Band Optical Switching , 2014, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[16]  P. Zakynthinos,et al.  Enabling transparent technologies for the development of highly granular flexible optical cross-connects , 2014, 2014 16th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks (ICTON).