The Influence of Real Human Personality on Social Presence with a Virtual Human in Augmented Reality

Human responses to an interaction with a Virtual Human (VH) can be influenced by both external factors such as technology-related limitations, and internal factors such as individual differences in personality. While the impacts of external factors have been studied widely, and are typically controlled for in application scenarios, less attention has been devoted to the impacts of internal factors. We present the results of a human-subject experiment where we investigated a particular internal factor: the effects of extraversion-introversion traits of participants on the sense of social presence with a VH in an Augmented Reality (AR) setting. Our results indicate a positive association between a condition where the VH proactively requests help from the participant, and participants indicating higher social presence with the VH, regardless of their personality. However, we also found that extraverted participants tended to report higher social presence with the VH, compared to the introverted participants. In addition, there were differences in the duration of when the participants were looking at the VH during the interaction according to their extraversion-introversion traits. Our results suggest that a real human's personality plays a significant role in interactions with a VH, and thus should be considered when carrying out such experiments that include measures of the effects of controlled manipulations on interactions with a VH. We present the details of our experiment and discuss the findings and potential implications related to human perceptions and behaviors with a VH.

[1]  Gert Jan Hofstede,et al.  Exploring Culture: Exercises, Stories and Synthetic Cultures , 2002 .

[2]  Justine Cassell,et al.  Relational agents: a model and implementation of building user trust , 2001, CHI.

[3]  Nicole C. Krämer,et al.  How Our Personality Shapes Our Interactions with Virtual Characters - Implications for Research and Development , 2010, IVA.

[4]  Saniye Tugba Bulu,et al.  Place presence, social presence, co-presence, and satisfaction in virtual worlds , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[5]  James W. Pennebaker,et al.  Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC2007) , 2007 .

[6]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Designing social presence of social actors in human computer interaction , 2003, CHI '03.

[7]  N A Mobbs,et al.  Eye-contact in relation to social introversion-extraversion. , 1968, The British journal of social and clinical psychology.

[8]  J. Loomis,et al.  Interpersonal Distance in Immersive Virtual Environments , 2003, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[9]  Ning Wang,et al.  Agreeable People Like Agreeable Virtual Humans , 2008, IVA.

[10]  Ning Wang,et al.  Does the contingency of agents' nonverbal feedback affect users' social anxiety? , 2008, AAMAS.

[11]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Consistency of personality in interactive characters: verbal cues, non-verbal cues, and user characteristics , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[12]  Daniel Pietschmann,et al.  Do We Differ in Our Dispositional Tendency to Perceive Virtual Agents as Animate Beings? - The Influence of User Factors in the Evaluation of Virtual Agents , 2015, HCI.

[13]  D. Berlyne The influence of complexity and novelty in visual figures on orienting responses. , 1958, Journal of experimental psychology.

[14]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  Gaze and task performance in shared virtual environments , 2002, Comput. Animat. Virtual Worlds.

[15]  Deborah Richards,et al.  The Influence of Users' Personality on the Perception of Intelligent Virtual Agents' Personality and the Trust Within a Collaborative Context , 2015, CARE/MFSC@AAMAS.

[16]  D. Watson,et al.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  Daniel Gatica-Perez,et al.  Rapport with Virtual Agents: What Do Human Social Cues and Personality Explain? , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing.

[18]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .

[19]  M. Garau,et al.  The Impact of Avatar Fidelity on Social Interaction in Virtual Environments , 2003 .

[20]  Crystal L. Hoyt,et al.  Immersive Virtual Environment Technology as a Methodological Tool for Social Psychology , 2002 .

[21]  W. Ickes,et al.  Big Five predictors of behavior and perceptions in initial dyadic interactions: personality similarity helps extraverts and introverts, but hurts "disagreeables". , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  Myers,et al.  Gifts Differing: Understanding Personality Type , 1980 .

[23]  Matthias J. Wieser,et al.  Virtual Social Interactions in Social Anxiety - The Impact of Sex, Gaze, and Interpersonal Distance , 2010, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[24]  J. Gratch,et al.  Who Is there? Can a Virtual Agent Really Elicit Social Presence? , 2009 .

[25]  Nicole C. Krämer,et al.  It's in Their Eyes: A Study on Female and Male Virtual Humans' Gaze , 2011, IVA.

[26]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Does computer-generated speech manifest personality? an experimental test of similarity-attraction , 2000, CHI.

[27]  Frank Biocca,et al.  The Effect of the Agency and Anthropomorphism on Users' Sense of Telepresence, Copresence, and Social Presence in Virtual Environments , 2003, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[28]  Anthony Steed,et al.  Lie tracking: social presence, truth and deception in avatar-mediated telecommunication , 2010, CHI.