Towards an objective quantitative assessment of daily functioning in migraine: a feasibility study

&NA; Migraine is a chronic disabling disorder, with migraine episodes significantly reducing quality of life and leading to impaired functioning (physically, socially, emotionally) both at home and at work. We explored whether ambulatory accelerometry can be used as an objective method to quantify the behavioral aspects of migraine‐related disability. Four body mounted uni‐axial piezo‐resistive accelerometers were used to quantify the time spent in different body postures (lying, sitting, standing), physical activities (walking, cycling) and a general index of body motility during eight migraine attacks and subsequent recovery periods of six patients in their habitual environment. The migraine attacks and recovery periods could be monitored after about 1 h, which was the time required for the investigator to travel to the patient and for the sensors to be attached. In order to quantify the influence of a migraine episode on daily activities, we also performed measurements during a headache‐free baseline period of the same patients. Overall, the procedures functioned well, indicating that ambulatory accelerometry measurements before, during and after a migraine attack are feasible to perform. Furthermore, our quantitative data revealed that migraine always influenced behavior by reducing overall body motility and that, dependent upon the severity of the attack, the effectiveness of acute treatment and the time of day, the time spent in various body positions, dynamic activities, and the number of postural transitions were affected. This feasibility study showed that ambulatory accelerometry can provide the objective behavioral effect parameters for the evaluation of migraine and its treatment on daily functioning in the habitual environment of migraine patients.

[1]  J. Bussmann,et al.  Ambulatory accelerometry to quantify motor behaviour in patients after failed back surgery: a validation study , 1998, Pain.

[2]  R. Lipton,et al.  Reliability of the Migraine Disability Assessment Score in A Population-Based Sample of Headache Sufferers , 1999, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.

[3]  Pierre Denise,et al.  Circadian pattern of motor activity in major depressed patients undergoing antidepressant therapy: Relationship between actigraphic measures and clinical course , 1994, Psychiatry Research.

[4]  J. Bussmann,et al.  Quantification of physical activities by means of ambulatory accelerometry: a validation study. , 1998, Psychophysiology.

[5]  Henk J. Stam,et al.  Ambulatory monitoring of mobility-related activities: the initial phase of the development of an activity monitor , 1995 .

[6]  H. Bussmann,et al.  Ambulatory monitoring of mobility-related activities in rehabilitation medicine , 1998 .

[7]  J. Olesen,et al.  Epidemiology of headache in a general population--a prevalence study. , 1991, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[8]  W F Stewart,et al.  Prevalence of migraine headache in the United States. Relation to age, income, race, and other sociodemographic factors. , 1992, JAMA.

[9]  R. F. Nelson,et al.  Impact of Migraine and Tension-Type Headache on Life-Style, Consulting Behaviour, and Medication Use: A Canadian Population Survey , 1993, Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques.

[10]  K. Nakashima,et al.  Acrophase Amplitude of Ambulatory Blood Pressure Decreases in Migraineurs , 1997, Headache.

[11]  B. Gandek,et al.  Measuring the Functional Status and Well‐Being of Patients with Migraine Headache , 1994, Headache.

[12]  P. Veltink,et al.  Validity and reliability of measurements obtained with an "activity monitor" in people with and without a transtibial amputation. , 1998, Physical therapy.

[13]  David S. Krantz,et al.  Automated physical activity monitoring: validation and comparison with physiological and self-report measures. , 1993, Psychophysiology.

[14]  W. Martens,et al.  The fast time frequency transform (F.T.F.T.): A novel on-line approach to the instantaneous spectrum , 1992, 1992 14th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[15]  R. Lipton,et al.  Reliability of an Illness Severity Measure for Headache in A Population Sample of Migraine Sufferers , 1998, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.

[16]  J. Dartigues,et al.  A Nationwide Survey of Migraine in France: Prevalence and Clinical Features in Adults , 1992, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.

[17]  R. Lipton,et al.  Migraine heterogeneity. Disability, pain intensity, and attack frequency and duration. , 1994, Neurology.

[18]  P. Goadsby A triptan too far? , 1998, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[19]  R. Lipton,et al.  Epidemiology of migraine. , 2001, Current pain and headache reports.

[20]  P H Veltink,et al.  Detection of static and dynamic activities using uniaxial accelerometers. , 1996, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[21]  A J Man in 't Veld,et al.  A novel tool to quantify physical activities: ambulatory accelerometry in psychopharmacology. , 1997, Journal of clinical psychopharmacology.

[22]  S. Kryst,et al.  A Population‐Based Survey of the Social and Personal Impact of Headache , 1994, Headache.

[23]  W F Stewart,et al.  Burden of migraine in the United States: disability and economic costs. , 1999, Archives of internal medicine.

[24]  M. D. Bóo,et al.  Health‐Related Quality of Life of Chronic Headache Patients Is Predicted by the Emotional Component of Their Pain , 1996, Headache.