What is in a tool concept? Dissociating manipulation knowledge from function knowledge

[1]  James T. Townsend,et al.  Methods of Modeling Capacity in Simple Processing Systems , 2014 .

[2]  M. Kiefer,et al.  Conceptual representations in mind and brain: Theoretical developments, current evidence and future directions , 2012, Cortex.

[3]  Bradford Z. Mahon,et al.  Factors Determining Semantic Facilitation and Interference in the Cyclic Naming Paradigm , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[4]  Michael Andres,et al.  Dissociation between manipulation and conceptual knowledge of object use in the supramarginalis gyrus , 2011, Human brain mapping.

[5]  Rutvik H. Desai,et al.  The neurobiology of semantic memory , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[6]  M. L. Ralph,et al.  Different roles of lateral anterior temporal lobe and inferior parietal lobule in coding function and manipulation tool knowledge: Evidence from an rTMS study , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  Bradford Z. Mahon,et al.  What drives the organization of object knowledge in the brain? , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  Combining speed and accuracy in cognitive psychology: Is the inverse efficiency score (IES) a better dependent variable than the mean reaction time (RT) and the percentage of errors (PE)? , 2011 .

[9]  Roel M. Willems,et al.  The Function of Words: Distinct Neural Correlates for Words Denoting Differently Manipulable Objects , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  E. Jefferies,et al.  Amodal semantic representations depend on both anterior temporal lobes: Evidence from repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  A. Chatterjee.  Disembodying cognition , 2010, Language and Cognition.

[12]  D. Kemmerer,et al.  The Two-Level Theory of verb meaning: An approach to integrating the semantics of action with the mirror neuron system , 2010, Brain and Language.

[13]  Gregory Hickok,et al.  Eight Problems for the Mirror Neuron Theory of Action Understanding in Monkeys and Humans , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[14]  Bradford Z. Mahon,et al.  A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content , 2008, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[15]  Tim Shallice,et al.  The different neural correlates of action and functional knowledge in semantic memory: an FMRI study. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[16]  G. Gigli,et al.  Degraded Semantic Knowledge And Accurate Object Use , 2007, Cortex.

[17]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  What is the role of motor simulation in action and object recognition? Evidence from apraxia , 2007, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[18]  A. Borghi,et al.  Sentence comprehension and action: Effector specific modulation of the motor system , 2007, Brain Research.

[19]  Friedemann Pulvermüller,et al.  Brain mechanisms linking language and action , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[20]  G. Lakoff,et al.  The Brain's concepts: the role of the Sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge , 2005, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[21]  L. Buxbaum,et al.  Distinctions between manipulation and function knowledge of objects: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[22]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  The orchestration of the sensory-motor systems: Clues from Neuropsychology , 2005, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[23]  E. Warrington,et al.  Abstract and concrete concepts have structurally different representational frameworks. , 2005, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[24]  Erminio Capitani,et al.  Apraxia is not associated to a disproportionate naming impairment for manipulable objects , 2003, Brain and Cognition.

[25]  Bradford Z. Mahon,et al.  WHAT ARE THE FACTS OF SEMANTIC CATEGORY-SPECIFIC DEFICITS? A CRITICAL REVIEW OF THE CLINICAL EVIDENCE , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[26]  Sergio E. Chaigneau,et al.  THE SIMILARITY-IN-TOPOGRAPHY PRINCIPLE: RECONCILING THEORIES OF CONCEPTUAL DEFICITS , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[27]  Kenneth I Forster,et al.  DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy , 2003, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[28]  L. Buxbaum,et al.  Knowledge of object manipulation and object function: dissociations in apraxic and nonapraxic subjects , 2002, Brain and Language.

[29]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Language Comprehenders Mentally Represent the Shapes of Objects , 2002, Psychological science.

[30]  R. Cubelli,et al.  Cognition in Action: Testing a Model of Limb Apraxia , 2000, Brain and Cognition.

[31]  A. Caramazza,et al.  The cognate facilitation effect: implications for models of lexical access. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[32]  C D Marsden,et al.  Limb apraxias: higher-order disorders of sensorimotor integration. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[33]  Myrna F. Schwartz,et al.  Function and manipulation tool knowledge in apraxia: Knowing ‘what for’ but not ‘how’ , 2000 .

[34]  A. Toomela.  Whither structured representation? , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[35]  R. Job,et al.  Visual effects in picture and word categorization , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[36]  T. Shallice,et al.  Category specific semantic impairments. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[37]  R. R. Peterson,et al.  Lexical selection and phonological encoding during language production: Evidence for cascaded processing. , 1998 .

[38]  Bernard Giusiano,et al.  Optic Aphasia: Evidence of the Contribution of Different Neural Systems to Object and Action Naming * * A subset of these data was presented at the Congress of the European Federation of Neurological Societies, Marseille, September 1995. , 1997, Cortex.

[39]  A. Sirigu,et al.  The role of sensorimotor experience in object recognition. A case of multimodal agnosia. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[40]  K. Heilman,et al.  A Cognitive Neuropsychological Model of Limb Praxis , 1991 .

[41]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  The multiple semantics hypothesis: Multiple confusions? , 1990 .

[42]  Richard J. Brown.  Neuropsychology Mental Structure , 1989 .

[43]  H. Coslett,et al.  Preserved object recognition and reading comprehension in optic aphasia. , 1989, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[44]  K. Heilman,et al.  Ideational apraxia: A deficit in tool selection and use , 1989, Annals of neurology.

[45]  E. Warrington,et al.  Categories of knowledge. Further fractionations and an attempted integration. , 1987, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[46]  M. Beauvois,et al.  Optic aphasia: a process of interaction between vision and language. , 1982, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[47]  D. Rottenberg,et al.  Neurological Classics in Modern Translation , 1977 .

[48]  Bradford Z. Mahon,et al.  Concepts and categories: a cognitive neuropsychological perspective. , 2009, Annual review of psychology.

[49]  L. Barsalou.  Grounded cognition. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[50]  M. Brett,et al.  Actions Speak Louder Than Functions: The Importance of Manipulability and Action in Tool Representation , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[51]  M. Wallace,et al.  Visual Localization Ability Influences Cross-Modal Bias , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[52]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Object Shape, Object Function, and Object Name , 1998 .

[53]  J. Gibson.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .