Sustainable Last-Mile Delivery Solution Evaluation in the Context of a Developing Country: A Novel OPA–Fuzzy MARCOS Approach

With the surge in e-commerce volumes during COVID-19, improving last-mile logistics is extremely challenging, specifically for developing economies, due to poor infrastructures, lack of stakeholders’ cooperation, and untapped resources. In the context of Vietnam, there are certain solutions that can bring more efficient and sustainable last-mile logistics. In this paper, to evaluate and rank these potentially sustainable last-mile solutions (LMSs), we propose a novel hybrid multiple attribute decision-making (MADM) model that combines the Ordinal Priority Approach (OPA) and fuzzy Measurement of Alternatives and Ranking according to the COmpromise Solution (fuzzy MARCOS). Twelve sustainability factors of technical, economic, social, and environmental aspects were determined through a literature review and experts’ opinions to employ the MADM approach. A case study evaluating five LMSs in Vietnam concerning their sustainable implementation is solved to exhibit the proposed framework’s applicability. From the OPA findings, “efficiency”, “costs of implementation and control”, “voice of customer”, “reliability”, and “flexibility” are the topmost criteria when considering a new LMS implementation in the context of Vietnam. Moreover, sensitivity analysis and comparative analysis were performed to test the robustness of the approach. The results illustrate that the applied methods reach consistent solution rankings, where LMS-03 (convenience store pickup), LMS-02 (parcel lockers), and LMS-01 (green vehicles) are the best solutions in Vietnam. The study holds novelty in evaluating last-mile initiatives for Vietnam by utilizing a unique approach in the form of two novel MADM techniques, thus providing significant insights for research and applications.

[1]  Željko Stević,et al.  Selection of peanut butter machine by the integrated PSI-SV-MARCOS method , 2023, International Journal of Knowledge-based and Intelligent Engineering Systems.

[2]  D. Pamučar,et al.  A metaverse assessment model for sustainable transportation using ordinal priority approach and Aczel-Alsina norms , 2022, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[3]  W. Sałabun,et al.  TOWARDS RELIABLE DECISION-MAKING IN THE GREEN URBAN TRANSPORT DOMAIN , 2022, Facta Universitatis, Series: Mechanical Engineering.

[4]  R. Machemehl,et al.  Evaluation of e-scooters as transit last-mile solution , 2022, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[5]  D. Pamučar,et al.  Prioritizing transport planning strategies for freight companies towards zero carbon emission using ordinal priority approach , 2022, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[6]  Mouhamed Bayane Bouraima,et al.  Novel Spherical Fuzzy MARCOS Method for Assessment of Drone-Based City Logistics Concepts , 2021, Complex..

[7]  M. Kováč,et al.  A Novel Hybrid MCDM Model for the Evaluation of Sustainable Last Mile Solutions , 2021, Mathematical Problems in Engineering.

[8]  Celal Alpay Havle,et al.  An integrated SWOT based fuzzy AHP and fuzzy MARCOS methodology for digital transformation strategy analysis in airline industry , 2021, Journal of Air Transport Management.

[9]  Maja Kiba-Janiak,et al.  Sustainable last mile delivery on e-commerce market in cities from the perspective of various stakeholders. Literature review , 2021 .

[10]  Olja Čokorilo,et al.  The The Application of Drones in City Logistics Concepts , 2021, Promet - Traffic&Transportation.

[11]  Fatih Ecer,et al.  A consolidated MCDM framework for performance assessment of battery electric vehicles based on ranking strategies , 2021, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[12]  D. Pamučar,et al.  Assessment of alternative fuel vehicles for sustainable road transportation of United States using integrated fuzzy FUCOM and neutrosophic fuzzy MARCOS methodology. , 2021, The Science of the total environment.

[13]  Chia-Nan Wang,et al.  A Compromised Decision-Making Approach to Third-Party Logistics Selection in Sustainable Supply Chain Using Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy VIKOR Methods , 2021, Mathematics.

[14]  Yi Peng,et al.  A two-stage ranking method to minimize ordinal violation for pairwise comparisons , 2021, Appl. Soft Comput..

[15]  Yejun Xu,et al.  Fuzzy best-worst method and its application in initial water rights allocation , 2020, Appl. Soft Comput..

[16]  Amin Mahmoudi,et al.  Sustainable Supplier Selection in Megaprojects: Grey Ordinal Priority Approach , 2020 .

[17]  Ravi Shankar,et al.  Evaluating solutions to overcome humanitarian supply chain management barriers: A hybrid fuzzy SWARA – Fuzzy WASPAS approach , 2020 .

[18]  Wojciech Salabun,et al.  Fuzzy Model Identification Using Monolithic and Structured Approaches in Decision Problems with Partially Incomplete Data , 2020, Symmetry.

[19]  E. Gijsbrechts,et al.  Navigating the last mile in grocery shopping: The click and collect format , 2020 .

[20]  Fatih Ecer,et al.  Sustainable supplier selection: A novel integrated fuzzy best worst method (F-BWM) and fuzzy CoCoSo with Bonferroni (CoCoSo’B) multi-criteria model , 2020 .

[21]  M. Figliozzi Carbon emissions reductions in last mile and grocery deliveries utilizing air and ground autonomous vehicles , 2020, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.

[22]  M. Breitner,et al.  Shortening the Last Mile in Urban Areas: Optimizing a Smart Logistics Concept for E-Grocery Operations , 2020 .

[23]  Miomir Stanković,et al.  A New Fuzzy MARCOS Method for Road Traffic Risk Analysis , 2020, Mathematics.

[24]  Shanlin Yang,et al.  Distribution linguistic preference relations with incomplete symbolic proportions for group decision making , 2020, Appl. Soft Comput..

[25]  Prasenjit Chatterjee,et al.  Sustainable supplier selection in healthcare industries using a new MCDM method: Measurement of alternatives and ranking according to COmpromise solution (MARCOS) , 2020, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[26]  Agnieszka Szmelter-Jarosz,et al.  Priorities of Urban Transport System Stakeholders According to Crowd Logistics Solutions in City Areas. A Sustainability Perspective , 2019, Sustainability.

[27]  Yejun Xu,et al.  Consensus model for large-scale group decision making based on fuzzy preference relation with self-confidence: Detecting and managing overconfidence behaviors , 2019, Inf. Fusion.

[28]  A. Perego,et al.  Innovative solutions to increase last-mile delivery efficiency in B2C e-commerce: a literature review , 2019 .

[29]  Dragan Pamučar,et al.  New model for determining criteria weights: Level Based Weight Assessment (LBWA) model , 2019, Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering.

[30]  Kuancheng Huang,et al.  A decision model for last-mile delivery planning with crowdsourcing integration , 2019, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[31]  Khaled Abdelghany,et al.  The hybrid vehicle-drone routing problem for pick-up and delivery services , 2019, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[32]  Enrique Herrera-Viedma,et al.  Are incomplete and self-confident preference relations better in multicriteria decision making? A simulation-based investigation , 2019, Inf. Sci..

[33]  Darko Bozanic,et al.  Multi-criteria FUCOM – Fuzzy MABAC model for the selection of location for construction of single-span bailey bridge , 2019, Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering.

[34]  C. Macharis,et al.  Improving policy support in city logistics: The contributions of a multi-actor multi-criteria analysis , 2018, Case Studies on Transport Policy.

[35]  Dragan Pamucar,et al.  A New Model for Determining Weight Coefficients of Criteria in MCDM Models: Full Consistency Method (FUCOM) , 2018, Symmetry.

[36]  Kum Fai Yuen,et al.  An investigation of customers’ intention to use self-collection services for last-mile delivery , 2018, Transport Policy.

[37]  William J. Rose,et al.  Crowdsourcing Last Mile Delivery: Strategic Implications and Future Research Directions , 2018 .

[38]  K. Hjort,et al.  What's in the parcel locker? Exploring customer value in e-commerce last mile delivery , 2017, Journal of Business Research.

[39]  Ewa Roszkowska,et al.  The fuzzy saw and fuzzy TOPSIS procedures based on ordered fuzzy numbers , 2016, Inf. Sci..

[40]  Qing Liu,et al.  Towards enhancing the last-mile delivery: An effective crowd-tasking model with scalable solutions , 2016 .

[41]  Milena Janjevic,et al.  Strategic scenarios for sustainable urban distribution in Brussels-Capital Region using Urban Consolidation Centres , 2015 .

[42]  J. Rezaei Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method , 2015 .

[43]  Slobodan Zecevic,et al.  A novel hybrid MCDM model based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy VIKOR for city logistics concept selection , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[44]  Jacek Zak,et al.  Ranking of Distribution System's Redesign Scenarios Using Stochastic MCDM/A Procedure☆ , 2014 .

[45]  Gülçin Büyüközkan,et al.  A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[46]  Anjali Awasthi,et al.  A hybrid approach integrating Affinity Diagram, AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS for sustainable city logistics planning , 2012 .

[47]  Xiaodong Liu,et al.  Selection of logistics center location using Axiomatic Fuzzy Set and TOPSIS methodology in logistics management , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[48]  Alireza Alinezhad,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis of TOPSIS Technique: The Results of Change in the Weight of One Attribute on the Final Ranking of Alternatives , 2011 .

[49]  Morteza Yazdani,et al.  Risk Analysis of Critical Infrastructures Using Fuzzy Copras , 2011 .

[50]  Chia-Chi Sun,et al.  A performance evaluation model by integrating fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[51]  L. Zadeh Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility , 1999 .

[52]  E. Paulson,et al.  An Approximate Normalization of the Analysis of Variance Distribution , 1942 .

[53]  Chia-Nan Wang,et al.  Evaluating Sustainable Last-Mile Delivery (LMD) in B2C E-Commerce Using Two-Stage Fuzzy MCDM Approach: A Case Study from Vietnam , 2021, IEEE Access.

[54]  R. S. Bharj,et al.  Solar hybrid e-cargo rickshaw for urban transportation demand in India , 2020 .

[55]  Libor Švadlenka,et al.  Picture Fuzzy Decision-Making Approach for Sustainable Last-Mile Delivery , 2020, IEEE Access.

[56]  J.H.R. van Duin,et al.  From home delivery to parcel lockers: a case study in Amsterdam , 2020 .

[57]  Amin Mahmoudi,et al.  Ordinal Priority Approach (OPA) in Multiple Attribute Decision-Making , 2020, Appl. Soft Comput..

[58]  Wanglin Yan,et al.  The package redelivery problem, convenience store solution, and the delivery desert: Case study in Aoba Ward, Yokohama , 2019 .

[59]  Snežana Tadić,et al.  Assessment of the political city logistics initiatives sustainability , 2018 .

[60]  Kinga Kijewska,et al.  Analysis of Parcel Lockers’ Efficiency as the Last Mile Delivery Solution – The Results of the Research in Poland , 2016 .

[61]  Alberto Colorni,et al.  E-bikes and e-scooters for smart logistics: environmental and economic sustainability in pro-e-bike Italian pilots , 2016 .

[62]  L. A. ZADEH,et al.  The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning - I , 1975, Inf. Sci..