Structural diversity in the RGS domain and its interaction with heterotrimeric G protein α-subunits

Regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins accelerate GTP hydrolysis by Gα subunits and thus facilitate termination of signaling initiated by G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). RGS proteins hold great promise as disease intervention points, given their signature role as negative regulators of GPCRs—receptors to which the largest fraction of approved medications are currently directed. RGS proteins share a hallmark RGS domain that interacts most avidly with Gα when in its transition state for GTP hydrolysis; by binding and stabilizing switch regions I and II of Gα, RGS domain binding consequently accelerates Gα-mediated GTP hydrolysis. The human genome encodes more than three dozen RGS domain-containing proteins with varied Gα substrate specificities. To facilitate their exploitation as drug-discovery targets, we have taken a systematic structural biology approach toward cataloging the structural diversity present among RGS domains and identifying molecular determinants of their differential Gα selectivities. Here, we determined 14 structures derived from NMR and x-ray crystallography of members of the R4, R7, R12, and RZ subfamilies of RGS proteins, including 10 uncomplexed RGS domains and 4 RGS domain/Gα complexes. Heterogeneity observed in the structural architecture of the RGS domain, as well as in engagement of switch III and the all-helical domain of the Gα substrate, suggests that unique structural determinants specific to particular RGS protein/Gα pairings exist and could be used to achieve selective inhibition by small molecules.

[1]  R. Aebersold,et al.  RGSZ1, a Gz-selective RGS Protein in Brain , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[2]  Brian Kuhlman,et al.  Minimal determinants for binding activated G alpha from the structure of a G alpha(i1)-peptide dimer. , 2006, Biochemistry.

[3]  H. Hamm,et al.  The α-Helical Domain of Gαt Determines Specific Interaction with Regulator of G Protein Signaling 9* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[4]  C. Barnes,et al.  Dynamic Regulation of RGS2 Suggests a Novel Mechanism in G-Protein Signaling and Neuronal Plasticity , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  Wei He,et al.  Structural determinants for regulation of phosphodiesterase by a G protein at 2.0 Å , 2001, Nature.

[6]  D. Siderovski,et al.  Receptor-Mediated Activation of Heterotrimeric G-Proteins: Current Structural Insights , 2007, Molecular Pharmacology.

[7]  P. Chidiac,et al.  Characterization and comparison of RGS2 and RGS4 as GTPase-activating proteins for m2 muscarinic receptor-stimulated G(i). , 2002, Molecular pharmacology.

[8]  N. Tjandra,et al.  Solution structure of human GAIP (Galpha interacting protein): a regulator of G protein signaling. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  Galphai3 primes the G protein-activated K+ channels for activation by coexpressed Gbetagamma in intact Xenopus oocytes. , 2007, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  S. Heximer,et al.  G Protein Selectivity Is a Determinant of RGS2 Function* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[11]  S. Sprang,et al.  Structure of the p115RhoGEF rgRGS domain–Gα13/i1 chimera complex suggests convergent evolution of a GTPase activator , 2005, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[12]  F. Moy,et al.  NMR structure of free RGS4 reveals an induced conformational change upon binding Galpha. , 2000, Biochemistry.

[13]  J. M. Wyss,et al.  Hypertension and prolonged vasoconstrictor signaling in RGS2-deficient mice. , 2003, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[14]  Y. Porozov,et al.  Gαi1 and Gαi3 Differentially Interact with, and Regulate, the G Protein-activated K+ Channel* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[15]  T. Kozasa,et al.  RGS14, a GTPase-Activating Protein for Giα, Attenuates Giα- and G13α-Mediated Signaling Pathways , 2000 .

[16]  Edgar Jacoby,et al.  The 7 TM G‐Protein‐Coupled Receptor Target Family , 2006, ChemMedChem.

[17]  P. Casey,et al.  RGSZ1, a Gz-selective Regulator of G Protein Signaling Whose Action Is Sensitive to the Phosphorylation State of Gzα* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[18]  I. Whishaw,et al.  Regulation of T cell activation, anxiety, and male aggression by RGS2. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  J. Sondek,et al.  Gαq Directly Activates p63RhoGEF and Trio via a Conserved Extension of the Dbl Homology-associated Pleckstrin Homology Domain* , 2007, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[20]  S. Sprang,et al.  Structure of RGS4 Bound to AlF4 −-Activated Giα1: Stabilization of the Transition State for GTP Hydrolysis , 1997, Cell.

[21]  D. Siderovski,et al.  The RGS protein inhibitor CCG-4986 is a covalent modifier of the RGS4 Galpha-interaction face. , 2007, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[22]  T. Kozasa,et al.  Snapshot of Activated G Proteins at the Membrane: The Gαq-GRK2-Gßγ Complex , 2005, Science.

[23]  Stefan Offermanns,et al.  Mammalian G proteins and their cell type specific functions. , 2005, Physiological reviews.

[24]  R. Lefkowitz,et al.  GTPase Activating Specificity of RGS12 and Binding Specificity of an Alternatively Spliced PDZ (PSD-95/Dlg/ZO-1) Domain* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[25]  P. Chanda,et al.  Regulator of G protein signaling Z1 (RGSZ1) interacts with Galpha i subunits and regulates Galpha i-mediated cell signaling. , 2002, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[26]  W. Snider,et al.  Selective role for RGS12 as a Ras/Raf/MEK scaffold in nerve growth factor‐mediated differentiation , 2007, The EMBO journal.

[27]  R. Karas,et al.  Regulator of G-protein signaling-2 mediates vascular smooth muscle relaxation and blood pressure , 2003, Nature Medicine.

[28]  R. Todd,et al.  Dopamine D2L receptor couples to G alpha i2 and G alpha i3 but not G alpha i1, leading to the inhibition of adenylate cyclase in transfected cell lines. , 1996, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[29]  R. Aebersold,et al.  RGSZ1, a G(z)-selective rgs protein in brain: Structure, membrane association, regulation by Gα(z) phosphorylation, and relationship to a G(z) gtpase-activating protein subfamily , 1998 .

[30]  S. Muallem,et al.  The N-terminal Domain of RGS4 Confers Receptor-selective Inhibition of G Protein Signaling* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[31]  T. Wieland,et al.  Molecular architecture of Gαo and the structural basis for RGS16-mediated deactivation , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  D. Siderovski,et al.  Differential G-alpha interaction capacities of the GoLoco motifs in Rap GTPase activating proteins. , 2007, Cellular signalling.

[33]  S. Heximer,et al.  RGS Proteins: Swiss Army Knives in Seven-Transmembrane Domain Receptor Signaling Networks , 2007, Science's STKE.

[34]  Andrew P Morris,et al.  Genetic dissection of a behavioral quantitative trait locus shows that Rgs2 modulates anxiety in mice , 2004, Nature Genetics.

[35]  N. Dascal,et al.  Gαi3 primes the G protein‐activated K+ channels for activation by coexpressed Gβγ in intact Xenopus oocytes , 2007 .

[36]  S. Heximer,et al.  RGS2/G0S8 is a selective inhibitor of Gqα function , 1997 .

[37]  D. Siderovski,et al.  G-protein signaling: back to the future , 2005, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

[38]  P. Chidiac,et al.  Characterization and comparison of RGS2 and RGS4 as GTPase-activating proteins for m2 muscarinic receptor-stimulated Gi , 2002 .

[39]  A. Gilman,et al.  A G protein γ subunit-like domain shared between RGS11 and other RGS proteins specifies binding to Gβ5 subunits , 1998 .

[40]  Richard R. Neubig,et al.  Regulators of G-Protein signalling as new central nervous system drug targets , 2002, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[41]  D. Siderovski,et al.  Covalent immobilization of histidine-tagged proteins for surface plasmon resonance. , 2006, Analytical biochemistry.

[42]  Michael Andrec,et al.  A large data set comparison of protein structures determined by crystallography and NMR: Statistical test for structural differences and the effect of crystal packing , 2007, Proteins.

[43]  M. Tyers,et al.  A new family of regulators of G-protein-coupled receptors? , 1996, Current Biology.

[44]  T. Kozasa,et al.  The regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) domains of RGS4, RGS10, and GAIP retain GTPase activating protein activity in vitro. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  P. Chanda,et al.  Regulator of G Protein Signaling Z1 (RGSZ1) Interacts with Gαi Subunits and Regulates Gαi-mediated Cell Signaling* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[46]  D. Siderovski,et al.  The GAPs, GEFs, and GDIs of heterotrimeric G-protein alpha subunits , 2005, International journal of biological sciences.