A solid iodinated phantom material for use in tomographic x-ray imaging.

PURPOSE Iodinated phantoms are of value in x-ray imaging for quality control measurements, system calibration, and for use in the research setting; however, the liquid phantoms that are most often used have several limitations including variability between repeated dilutions, inhomogeneities from air bubbles or precipitants, and long set up times. Although suitable materials have been investigated for projection radiography, quantitative measurements of contrast enhancement in computed tomography (CT) have become increasingly important in the clinic, and a need exists for a durable and reproducible iodinated phantom material. In this work, the authors describe a solid radiographic phantom material that has an accurately known concentration of iodine distributed uniformly throughout its volume and that has stable properties over time. This material can be molded or machined into a desired shape to create a test object or for use in an anthropomorphic phantom. METHODS Two sets of calibration phantoms were produced with a clinically relevant range of iodine concentrations. Measurements were made on these phantoms to characterize the material properties in terms of accuracy of iodine concentration, radiographic uniformity, temporal stability of x-ray attenuation, and manufacturing repeatability. Experimentally measured linear x-ray attenuation coefficients were compared to those predicted by a theoretical model. The uniformity of the iodine distribution in the material was assessed by measuring image intensity variation, both in projection images and in reconstructed CT volumes. The reproducibility of manufacture was estimated on a set of independently produced samples. A longitudinal study was performed to assess the stability of the material x-ray characteristics over time by making measurements at 6 month intervals. RESULTS Good agreement was seen between the experimental measurements of effective attenuation and the theoretically predicted values. It is estimated that a desired iodine concentration could be produced to within 0.04 mg/ml. Comparison of the measured effective linear iodine attenuation coefficients of eight 1.0 mg/ml samples indicated a manufacturing reproducibility of +/-0.03 mg/ml iodine. Variations in uniformity across each of the samples were on the order of image intensity fluctuations (sigma). No inhomogeneities due to mixing or settling were apparent. An analysis of longitudinal data collected for both calibration sets revealed no perceptible change in radiographic properties over the first 6 months after manufacture, nor over a subsequent 1.5 yr period from 1 yr postmanufacture onward. CONCLUSIONS The uniformity, stability, and precision of this iodinated material suggest that it is suitable for use in accurate calibration tools for contrast tomographic imaging.

[1]  Validation of the use of calibration factors between the iodine concentration and the computed tomography number measured outside the objects for estimation of iodine concentration inside the objects: phantom experiment , 2008, Radiation Medicine.

[2]  Pei-Jan Paul Lin,et al.  Performance Evaluation and Quality Assurance in Digital Subtraction Angiography , 1985 .

[3]  Serge Muller,et al.  Development of contrast digital mammography. , 2002, Medical physics.

[4]  R. Morin,et al.  Effect of Acquisition Technique on Radiation Dose and Image Quality in Multidetector Row Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography With Submillimeter Collimation , 2005, Investigative radiology.

[5]  Satoshi Miyajima,et al.  CdZnTe detector in diagnostic x-ray spectroscopy. , 2002, Medical physics.

[6]  Idris Elbakri,et al.  Effect of scatter and an antiscatter grid on the performance of a slot-scanning digital mammography system. , 2006, Medical physics.

[7]  Martin J Yaffe,et al.  Contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical experience. , 2003, Radiology.

[8]  Francis R Verdun,et al.  Detection of low-contrast objects: experimental comparison of single- and multi-detector row CT with a phantom. , 2002, Radiology.

[9]  P. Alderson,et al.  A comparative study of thoracic radiation doses from 64-slice cardiac CT. , 2007, The British journal of radiology.

[10]  G Belli,et al.  Physical characteristics of five clinical systems for digital mammography. , 2007, Medical physics.

[11]  M L Giger,et al.  Dynamic and static phantoms for evaluation of digital subtraction angiographic systems. , 1985, Radiology.

[12]  S Suryanarayanan,et al.  Full breast digital mammography with an amorphous silicon-based flat panel detector: physical characteristics of a clinical prototype. , 2000, Medical physics.

[13]  John M Boone,et al.  Radiological interpretation 2020: toward quantitative image assessment. , 2007, Medical physics.

[14]  Francis R Verdun,et al.  Effect of X-ray Tube Parameters, Iodine Concentration, and Patient Size on Image Quality in Pulmonary Computed Tomography Angiography: A Chest-Phantom-Study , 2008, Investigative radiology.

[15]  Philip M Evans,et al.  Calculation of x-ray spectra emerging from an x-ray tube. Part I. electron penetration characteristics in x-ray targets. , 2007, Medical physics.

[16]  J. Boone,et al.  Dedicated breast CT: initial clinical experience. , 2008, Radiology.

[17]  W. Koroshetz,et al.  First-pass quantitative CT perfusion identifies thresholds for salvageable penumbra in acute stroke patients treated with intra-arterial therapy. , 2006, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[18]  Shinichiro Mori,et al.  Physical performance evaluation of a 256-slice CT-scanner for four-dimensional imaging. , 2004, Medical physics.

[19]  Masatoshi Saito,et al.  Dual-energy approach to contrast-enhanced mammography using the balanced filter method: spectral optimization and preliminary phantom measurement. , 2007, Medical physics.

[20]  Raymond P. Rossi,et al.  Specification and Acceptance Testing of Computed Tomography Scanners , 1993 .

[21]  M. Koukourakis,et al.  Early Antivascular Effects of Bevacizumab Anti-VEGF Monoclonal Antibody on Colorectal Carcinomas Assessed With Functional CT Imaging , 2007, American journal of clinical oncology.

[22]  J A Rowlands,et al.  X-ray detectors for digital radiography. , 1997, Physics in medicine and biology.

[23]  C. Thng,et al.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT of head and neck tumors: perfusion measurements using a distributed-parameter tracer kinetic model. Initial results and comparison with deconvolution-based analysis , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  Gordon E Mawdsley,et al.  Lag and ghosting in a clinical flat-panel selenium digital mammography system. , 2006, Medical physics.

[25]  Keana D Allert,et al.  Novel Materials for Low-Contrast Phantoms for Computed Tomography. , 2007, Journal of X-ray science and technology.

[26]  M. E. Masterson,et al.  Epoxy-resin-based tissue substitutes. , 1977, Medical physics.

[27]  Willi A Kalender,et al.  Application- and patient size-dependent optimization of x-ray spectra for CT. , 2009, Medical physics.

[28]  A. Cotroneo,et al.  Four-Detector Row Computed Tomographic Angiography in the Evaluation of Infrarenal Aorta and Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease: Influence of Contrast Medium Concentration , 2008, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[29]  Michael Sandborg,et al.  A search for optimal x-ray spectra in iodine contrast media mammography. , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[30]  Martin J Yaffe,et al.  Direct conversion detectors: the effect of incomplete charge collection on detective quantum efficiency. , 2002, Medical physics.

[31]  W A Kalender,et al.  New low-contrast resolution phantoms for computed tomography. , 1999, Medical physics.

[32]  H Kanamori,et al.  Direct measurement of mammographic x-ray spectra using a CdZnTe detector. , 2000, Medical physics.

[33]  Anthony Fyles,et al.  Assessment of the tumor microenvironment in cervix cancer using dynamic contrast enhanced CT, interstitial fluid pressure and oxygen measurements. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[34]  G. Poludniowski Calculation of x-ray spectra emerging from an x-ray tube. Part II. X-ray production and filtration in x-ray targets. , 2007, Medical physics.

[35]  Peter D. Esser,et al.  Quantitative contrast-enhanced computed tomography: is there a need for system calibration? , 2007, European Radiology.