Predicting Type 2 Diabetes Based on Polymorphisms From Genome-Wide Association Studies

OBJECTIVE—Prediction of type 2 diabetes based on genetic testing might improve identification of high-risk subjects. Genome-wide association (GWA) studies identified multiple new genetic variants that associate with type 2 diabetes. The predictive value of genetic testing for prediction of type 2 diabetes in the general population is unclear. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—We investigated 18 polymorphisms from recent GWA studies on type 2 diabetes in the Rotterdam Study, a prospective, population-based study among homogeneous Caucasian individuals of 55 years and older (genotyped subjects, n = 6,544; prevalent cases, n = 686; incident cases during follow-up, n = 601; mean follow-up 10.6 years). The predictive value of these polymorphisms was examined alone and in addition to clinical characteristics using logistic and Cox regression analyses. The discriminative accuracy of the prediction models was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs). RESULTS—Of the 18 polymorphisms, the ADAMTS9, CDKAL1, CDKN2A/B-rs1412829, FTO, IGF2BP2, JAZF1, SLC30A8, TCF7L2, and WFS1 variants were associated with type 2 diabetes risk in our population. The AUC was 0.60 (95% CI 0.57–0.63) for prediction based on the genetic polymorphisms; 0.66 (0.63–0.68) for age, sex, and BMI; and 0.68 (0.66–0.71) for the genetic polymorphisms and clinical characteristics combined. CONCLUSIONS—We showed that 9 of 18 well-established genetic risk variants were associated with type 2 diabetes in a population-based study. Combining genetic variants has low predictive value for future type 2 diabetes at a population-based level. The genetic polymorphisms only marginally improved the prediction of type 2 diabetes beyond clinical characteristics.

[1]  Michael Stumvoll,et al.  Type 2 diabetes: principles of pathogenesis and therapy , 2005, The Lancet.

[2]  M. McCarthy,et al.  Replication of Genome-Wide Association Signals in UK Samples Reveals Risk Loci for Type 2 Diabetes , 2007, Science.

[3]  Muin J Khoury,et al.  Improving the prediction of complex diseases by testing for multiple disease-susceptibility genes. , 2003, American journal of human genetics.

[4]  Peter M Visscher,et al.  Prediction of individual genetic risk to disease from genome-wide association studies. , 2007, Genome research.

[5]  C. Dina,et al.  Impact of Common Type 2 Diabetes Risk Polymorphisms in the DESIR Prospective Study , 2008, Diabetes.

[6]  J. Hanley,et al.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. , 1982, Radiology.

[7]  M. Permutt,et al.  Post Genome-Wide Association Studies of Novel Genes Associated with Type 2 Diabetes Show Gene-Gene Interaction and High Predictive Value , 2008, PloS one.

[8]  J. Hanley,et al.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. , 1983, Radiology.

[9]  Mark Walker,et al.  Combining Information from Common Type 2 Diabetes Risk Polymorphisms Improves Disease Prediction , 2006, PLoS medicine.

[10]  Ewout W Steyerberg,et al.  The impact of genotype frequencies on the clinical validity of genomic profiling for predicting common chronic diseases , 2007, Genetics in Medicine.

[11]  G. Abecasis,et al.  A Genome-Wide Association Study of Type 2 Diabetes in Finns Detects Multiple Susceptibility Variants , 2007, Science.

[12]  Simon C. Potter,et al.  Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls , 2007, Nature.

[13]  P. Raskin,et al.  Report of the expert committee on the diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. , 1999, Diabetes care.

[14]  Monique M. B. Breteler,et al.  The Rotterdam Study: 2016 objectives and design update , 2015, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[15]  M. McCarthy,et al.  Meta-analysis of genome-wide association data and large-scale replication identifies additional susceptibility loci for type 2 diabetes , 2008, Nature Genetics.

[16]  Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus , 1997, Diabetes Care.

[17]  P. Zimmet,et al.  Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1: diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Provisional report of a WHO Consultation , 1998, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[18]  M. McCarthy,et al.  Common variants in WFS1 confer risk of type 2 diabetes , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[19]  L. Groop,et al.  Genetic Prediction of Future Type 2 Diabetes , 2005, PLoS medicine.

[20]  G. Block,et al.  Will genetics revolutionize medicine? , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  Muin J Khoury,et al.  Predictive genetic testing for type 2 diabetes , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[22]  T. Frayling,et al.  A new era in finding Type 2 diabetes genes—the unusual suspects , 2007, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[23]  A. Hofman,et al.  Promoter and 3'-untranslated-region haplotypes in the vitamin d receptor gene predispose to osteoporotic fracture: the rotterdam study. , 2005, American journal of human genetics.

[24]  T. Hudson,et al.  A genome-wide association study identifies novel risk loci for type 2 diabetes , 2007, Nature.

[25]  N. Holtzman,et al.  Will genetics revolutionize medicine? , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  D. Gudbjartsson,et al.  Two variants on chromosome 17 confer prostate cancer risk, and the one in TCF2 protects against type 2 diabetes , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[27]  Marcia M. Nizzari,et al.  Genome-Wide Association Analysis Identifies Loci for Type 2 Diabetes and Triglyceride Levels , 2007, Science.

[28]  Ewout W Steyerberg,et al.  Predictive testing for complex diseases using multiple genes: Fact or fiction? , 2006, Genetics in Medicine.

[29]  A. Hofman,et al.  Apolipoprotein E gene is related to mortality only in normal weight individuals: The Rotterdam study , 2007, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[30]  A. Hofman,et al.  The Rotterdam Study: objectives and design update , 2007, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[31]  M. Khoury,et al.  Does Genetic Testing Really Improve the Prediction of Future Type 2 Diabetes? , 2006, PLoS medicine.