Modeling molecular development of breast cancer in canine mammary tumors

Understanding the changes in diverse molecular pathways underlying the development of breast tumors is critical for improving diagnosis, treatment, and drug development. Here, we used RNA-profiling of canine mammary tumors (CMTs) coupled with a robust analysis framework to model molecular changes in human breast cancer. Our study leveraged a key advantage of the canine model, the frequent presence of multiple naturally occurring tumors at diagnosis, thus providing samples spanning normal tissue and benign and malignant tumors from each patient. We showed human breast cancer signals, at both expression and mutation level, are evident in CMTs. Profiling multiple tumors per patient enabled by the CMT model allowed us to resolve statistically robust transcription patterns and biological pathways specific to malignant tumors versus those arising in benign tumors or shared with normal tissues. We showed that multiple histological samples per patient is necessary to effectively capture these progression-related signatures, and that carcinoma-specific signatures are predictive of survival for human breast cancer patients. To catalyze and support similar analyses and use of the CMT model by other biomedical researchers, we provide FREYA, a robust data processing pipeline and statistical analyses framework.

[1]  T. Ishikawa,et al.  Biologically Aggressive Phenotype and Anti-cancer Immunity Counterbalance in Breast Cancer with High Mutation Rate , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[2]  Steven L Salzberg,et al.  Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT-genotype , 2019, Nature Biotechnology.

[3]  G. Del Sal,et al.  Mutant p53 as a guardian of the cancer cell , 2018, Cell Death & Differentiation.

[4]  Todd R. Golub,et al.  Abstract 1028: Patient-derived xenografts undergo mouse-specific tumor evolution , 2018, Tumor Biology.

[5]  Peter W. Laird,et al.  Cell-of-Origin Patterns Dominate the Molecular Classification of 10,000 Tumors from 33 Types of Cancer , 2018, Cell.

[6]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Comprehensive Characterization of Cancer Driver Genes and Mutations , 2018, Cell.

[7]  K. Pietras,et al.  The PDGF pathway in breast cancer is linked to tumour aggressiveness, triple-negative subtype and early recurrence , 2018, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[8]  Astrid Gall,et al.  Ensembl 2018 , 2017, Nucleic Acids Res..

[9]  Thomas E Rohan,et al.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy induces breast cancer metastasis through a TMEM-mediated mechanism , 2017, Science Translational Medicine.

[10]  P. Lønning,et al.  Genomic Evolution of Breast Cancer Metastasis and Relapse , 2017, Cancer cell.

[11]  Ping Yang,et al.  Indel detection from RNA-seq data: tool evaluation and strategies for accurate detection of actionable mutations , 2016, Briefings Bioinform..

[12]  Chandra L. Theesfeld,et al.  Genome-wide prediction and functional characterization of the genetic basis of autism spectrum disorder , 2016, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  N. Rosenfeld,et al.  The somatic mutation profiles of 2,433 breast cancers refines their genomic and transcriptomic landscapes , 2016, Nature Communications.

[14]  C. Hetz,et al.  Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and the Hallmarks of Cancer. , 2016, Trends in cancer.

[15]  Mark Dewhirst,et al.  Perspectives from man’s best friend: National Academy of Medicine’s Workshop on Comparative Oncology , 2016, Science Translational Medicine.

[16]  I. Screpanti,et al.  In vitro and in vivo inhibition of breast cancer cell growth by targeting the Hedgehog/GLI pathway with SMO (GDC-0449) or GLI (GANT-61) inhibitors , 2016, Oncotarget.

[17]  E. Skjerve,et al.  Effect of Ovariohysterectomy at the Time of Tumor Removal in Dogs with Mammary Carcinomas: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2015, Journal of veterinary internal medicine.

[18]  Leigh G. Griffiths,et al.  Companion animals: Translational scientist’s new best friends , 2015, Science Translational Medicine.

[19]  Zachary C. Dobbin,et al.  Ovarian and cervical cancer patient derived xenografts: The past, present, and future. , 2015, Gynecologic oncology.

[20]  A. Børresen-Dale,et al.  Canine Mammary Tumours Are Affected by Frequent Copy Number Aberrations, including Amplification of MYC and Loss of PTEN , 2015, PloS one.

[21]  Daniel S. Himmelstein,et al.  Understanding multicellular function and disease with human tissue-specific networks , 2015, Nature Genetics.

[22]  A. Ashkenazi Targeting the extrinsic apoptotic pathway in cancer: lessons learned and future directions. , 2015, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[23]  R. Harris,et al.  Molecular mechanism and clinical impact of APOBEC3B-catalyzed mutagenesis in breast cancer , 2015, Breast Cancer Research.

[24]  M. Stoneking,et al.  Evaluating intra- and inter-individual variation in the human placental transcriptome , 2014, bioRxiv.

[25]  M. Cekanova,et al.  Animal models and therapeutic molecular targets of cancer: utility and limitations , 2014, Drug design, development and therapy.

[26]  Shaying Zhao,et al.  Molecular homology and difference between spontaneous canine mammary cancer and human breast cancer. , 2014, Cancer research.

[27]  C. V. Van Poznak,et al.  Oncotype Dx Results in Multiple Primary Breast Cancers , 2014, Breast cancer : basic and clinical research.

[28]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[29]  Kaleigh Fernald,et al.  Evading apoptosis in cancer. , 2013, Trends in cell biology.

[30]  Mauricio O. Carneiro,et al.  From FastQ Data to High‐Confidence Variant Calls: The Genome Analysis Toolkit Best Practices Pipeline , 2013, Current protocols in bioinformatics.

[31]  Wolfgang Huber,et al.  Drift and conservation of differential exon usage across tissues in primate species , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  N. A. Temiz,et al.  APOBEC3B is an enzymatic source of mutation in breast cancer , 2013, Nature.

[33]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours , 2013 .

[34]  W. Huber,et al.  Detecting differential usage of exons from RNA-seq data , 2012, Genome research.

[35]  Pablo Cingolani,et al.  © 2012 Landes Bioscience. Do not distribute. , 2022 .

[36]  F. Gärtner,et al.  Canine tumors: a spontaneous animal model of human carcinogenesis. , 2012, Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine.

[37]  Davis J. McCarthy,et al.  Differential expression analysis of multifactor RNA-Seq experiments with respect to biological variation , 2012, Nucleic acids research.

[38]  Arek Kasprzyk,et al.  BioMart: driving a paradigm change in biological data management , 2011, Database J. Biol. Databases Curation.

[39]  Jean-Pierre Gillet,et al.  Redefining the relevance of established cancer cell lines to the study of mechanisms of clinical anti-cancer drug resistance , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  C. Cole,et al.  COSMIC: the catalogue of somatic mutations in cancer , 2011, Genome Biology.

[41]  C. E. Alvarez,et al.  Dog models of naturally occurring cancer. , 2011, Trends in molecular medicine.

[42]  M. DePristo,et al.  A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data , 2011, Nature Genetics.

[43]  D. Hanahan,et al.  Hallmarks of Cancer: The Next Generation , 2011, Cell.

[44]  D. Sgroi,et al.  The molecular pathology of breast cancer progression , 2011, The Journal of pathology.

[45]  R. Klopfleisch,et al.  Molecular Carcinogenesis of Canine Mammary Tumors , 2011, Veterinary pathology.

[46]  V. Zappulli,et al.  Classification and Grading of Canine Mammary Tumors , 2011, Veterinary pathology.

[47]  Josyf Mychaleckyj,et al.  Robust relationship inference in genome-wide association studies , 2010, Bioinform..

[48]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent. , 2010, Journal of statistical software.

[49]  T. Dønnem,et al.  Co-expression of PDGF-B and VEGFR-3 strongly correlates with lymph node metastasis and poor survival in non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2010, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[50]  Aaron R. Quinlan,et al.  BIOINFORMATICS APPLICATIONS NOTE , 2022 .

[51]  M. Robinson,et al.  A scaling normalization method for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data , 2010, Genome Biology.

[52]  F. Shofer,et al.  Canine mammary gland tumours; a histological continuum from benign to malignant; clinical and histopathological evidence. , 2009, Veterinary and comparative oncology.

[53]  A. Nobel,et al.  Supervised risk predictor of breast cancer based on intrinsic subtypes. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[54]  M. Paoloni,et al.  Translation of new cancer treatments from pet dogs to humans , 2008, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[55]  D. Crawford,et al.  The biological importance of measuring individual variation , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[56]  John D. Storey,et al.  Gene-expression variation within and among human populations. , 2007, American journal of human genetics.

[57]  H. Iwase,et al.  [Breast cancer]. , 2006, Nihon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine.

[58]  T. Litman,et al.  A Serial Analysis of Gene Expression (SAGE) database analysis of chemosensitivity: comparing solid tumors with cell lines and comparing solid tumors from different tissue origins. , 2004, Cancer research.

[59]  Robert A. Weinberg,et al.  Comparative Biology of Mouse versus Human Cells: Modelling Human Cancer in Mice O P I N I O N , 2022 .

[60]  John D. Storey,et al.  Statistical significance for genomewide studies , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[61]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[62]  J. Tschopp,et al.  Defective death receptor signaling as a cause of tumor immune escape. , 2002, Seminars in cancer biology.