Spatially-Distributed RISs vs Relay-Assisted Systems: A Fair Comparison

This paper aims to make a comparison between decode-and-forward (DF) relays and reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (RISs) in the case where only one relay or RIS is selected based on the maximization of the signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR). Our study accounts for the spatial distribution of RISs and relays, which is assumed to follow a Poisson point process (PPP). It considers two different path loss models corresponding to RIS/relays randomly located in the near-field and the far-field of the transmitter. Based on the Gamma distribution moment matching method and tools from stochastic geometry, we derive approximations for the outage probability (OP) as well as the energy efficiency (EE) of the RISs-assisted system in the near-field and the far-field scenarios separately. Under the same conditions as RIS, the expressions for OP and EE of the half-duplex and the full-duplex DF relays-assisted systems are also derived. Simulation results are presented to corroborate the proposed analysis and compare between the three technologies. Our results show that RIS is the best choice in the near-field case, regardless of the OP or EE criterion. Compared to half-duplex relays and full-duplex relays, the RIS based system is the most energy-efficient solution to assist communication. Moreover, RIS allows for an improvement in both OP and EE when equipped with more reflecting elements or more densely deployed.

[1]  Hai Jiang,et al.  A Mixture Gamma Distribution to Model the SNR of Wireless Channels , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[2]  Shi Jin,et al.  Large Intelligent Surface-Assisted Wireless Communication Exploiting Statistical CSI , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[3]  Norman C. Beaulieu,et al.  Performance Analysis of Decode-and-Forward Relaying with Selection Combining , 2007, IEEE Communications Letters.

[4]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  Seven ways that HetNets are a cellular paradigm shift , 2013, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[5]  Mohamed-Slim Alouini,et al.  Wireless Communications Through Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces , 2019, IEEE Access.

[6]  Gaojie Chen,et al.  A Hybrid Relay and Intelligent Reflecting Surface Network and Its Ergodic Performance Analysis , 2020, IEEE Wireless Communications Letters.

[7]  Tiejun Lv,et al.  Energy-Efficient Transmission Design in Cooperative Relaying Systems Using NOMA , 2018, IEEE Communications Letters.

[8]  Emil Björnson,et al.  Power Scaling Laws and Near-Field Behaviors of Massive MIMO and Intelligent Reflecting Surfaces , 2020, IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society.

[9]  Qiang Cheng,et al.  Wireless Communications With Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface: Path Loss Modeling and Experimental Measurement , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[10]  Ying-Chang Liang,et al.  Channel Estimation for Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface Aided Multi-User MIMO Systems , 2019 .

[11]  Octavia A. Dobre,et al.  Large Intelligent Surface Assisted Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access: Performance Analysis , 2020, 2007.09611.

[12]  B. Shihada,et al.  What should 6G be? , 2019, Nature Electronics.

[13]  Victor Adamchik,et al.  The algorithm for calculating integrals of hypergeometric type functions and its realization in REDUCE system , 1990, ISSAC '90.

[14]  Robert Schober,et al.  Enabling Secure Wireless Communications via Intelligent Reflecting Surfaces , 2019, 2019 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM).

[15]  Gregory W. Wornell,et al.  Cooperative diversity in wireless networks: Efficient protocols and outage behavior , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[16]  Chau Yuen,et al.  Energy Efficient Multi-User MISO Communication Using Low Resolution Large Intelligent Surfaces , 2018, 2018 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps).

[17]  Ronghong Mo,et al.  Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface Assisted Multiuser MISO Systems Exploiting Deep Reinforcement Learning , 2020, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[18]  Chintha Tellambura,et al.  Is Backscatter Link Stronger than Direct Link in Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface-Assisted System? , 2020, IEEE Communications Letters.

[19]  Qingqing Wu,et al.  Intelligent Reflecting Surface Enhanced Wireless Network via Joint Active and Passive Beamforming , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[20]  Mohamed-Slim Alouini,et al.  Large Intelligent Surface Assisted MIMO Communications , 2019 .

[21]  Long Zhao,et al.  Wireless Power Transfer Empowered by Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces , 2021, IEEE Systems Journal.

[22]  Alexandros-Apostolos A. Boulogeorgos,et al.  Performance Analysis of Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface-Assisted Wireless Systems and Comparison With Relaying , 2020, IEEE Access.

[23]  Emil Björnson,et al.  Intelligent Reflecting Surface Versus Decode-and-Forward: How Large Surfaces are Needed to Beat Relaying? , 2019, IEEE Wireless Communications Letters.

[24]  Caijun Zhong,et al.  Performance Analysis of Intelligent Reflecting Surface Aided Communication Systems , 2020, IEEE Communications Letters.

[25]  Rui Zhang,et al.  Spatial Throughput Characterization for Intelligent Reflecting Surface Aided Multiuser System , 2020, IEEE Wireless Communications Letters.

[26]  Yong Zhou,et al.  Towards Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces Powered Green Wireless Networks , 2020, 2020 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC).

[27]  Jia Ye,et al.  Reflecting Modulation , 2020, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[28]  Mérouane Debbah,et al.  Overhead-Aware Design of Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces in Smart Radio Environments , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[30]  Mohamed-Slim Alouini,et al.  On the Sum of Order Statistics and Applications to Wireless Communication Systems Performances , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[31]  Shi Jin,et al.  Wireless Communications with Programmable Metasurface: New Paradigms, Opportunities, and Challenges on Transceiver Design , 2019, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[32]  Wessam Ajib,et al.  A Comprehensive Study of Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces in Generalized Fading , 2020, ArXiv.

[33]  Ertugrul Basar,et al.  Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface-Based Index Modulation: A New Beyond MIMO Paradigm for 6G , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[34]  Mohamed-Slim Alouini,et al.  Joint Reflecting and Precoding Designs for SER Minimization in Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces Assisted MIMO Systems , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[35]  L. Subrt,et al.  Controlling propagation environments using Intelligent Walls , 2012, 2012 6th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EUCAP).

[36]  Xi Xiong,et al.  Customizing indoor wireless coverage via 3D-fabricated reflectors , 2017, BuildSys@SenSys.

[37]  Qiang Cheng,et al.  Space-time-coding digital metasurfaces , 2018, Nature Communications.

[38]  Qiang Cheng,et al.  Coding metamaterials, digital metamaterials and programmable metamaterials , 2014, Light: Science & Applications.

[39]  Chau Yuen,et al.  Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces for Energy Efficiency in Wireless Communication , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.