Pain in patients attended at risk classification of an emergency service

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Pain is a major symptom responsible for the search for urgency care. This study aimed at checking the presence of pain in patients attending the risk classification. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional and descriptive study carried out at an urgency care unit, using a form with socio-demographic and clinical data, risk classification, analgesia and pain record on medical charts. Pain Management Index proposed by the World Health Organization was calculated. RESULTS: From 102 patients included in the study, 82 (80.2%) reported pain, 45 (54.9%) were females, 48 (58.5%) were married, most (62 – 75.6%) lived in Greater Aracaju, 28 (34.1%) were classified as yellow. Acute, severe to moderate pain was the most frequent. In 71 (86.6%) cases, continuous pain has motivated the search for urgency care. Pain recording was present in almost all medical charts, being 80.5% performed by physicians. Simple analgesics and non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs were the most frequently prescribed analgesics (59 – 72%). Pain management was inadequate in 86.6% of cases and there has been wide variation between admission and administration of first analgesia (mean: 94.5 min; min-max: 8-360 min). CONCLUSION: The lack of analgesic protocols at risk classification may impair adequate pain management.

[1]  Meral Ucuzal,et al.  Emergency nurses' knowledge, attitude and clinical decision making skills about pain. , 2015, International emergency nursing.

[2]  J. Halterman,et al.  The Impact of Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status and Race on the Prescribing of Opioids in Emergency Departments Throughout the United States , 2013, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[3]  P. Martins-Filho,et al.  Immediate post-craniotomy headache , 2013, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.

[4]  Gabriella Novelli Oliveira,et al.  Profile of the Population Cared for in a Referral Emergency Unit , 2011 .

[5]  T. Chianca,et al.  Risk classification in an emergency room: agreement level between a Brazilian institutional and the Manchester Protocol. , 2011, Revista latino-americana de enfermagem.

[6]  P. Langley,et al.  The prevalence, correlates and treatment of pain in the European Union , 2011, Current medical research and opinion.

[7]  H. V. van Stel,et al.  Pain assessments at triage with the Manchester triage system: a prospective observational study , 2010, Emergency Medicine Journal.

[8]  P. Klemm,et al.  Level of pain and waiting time in the emergency department. , 2010, Pain management nursing : official journal of the American Society of Pain Management Nurses.

[9]  Priscilla Hortense,et al.  Multidimensional pain evaluation scale. , 2010, Revista latino-americana de enfermagem.

[10]  Peter Homel,et al.  Pain in the emergency department: results of the pain and emergency medicine initiative (PEMI) multicenter study. , 2007, The journal of pain : official journal of the American Pain Society.

[11]  C. Pimenta,et al.  [Pain intensity of pain and adequacy of analgesia]. , 2005, Revista latino-americana de enfermagem.

[12]  W. Cordell,et al.  The high prevalence of pain in emergency medical care. , 2002, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[13]  Mariangela da Silva Nunes,et al.  Immediate post-craniotomy headache (Cephalalgia 2013) , 2014 .

[14]  C. Pimenta,et al.  Importance of pain evaluation and standardization of analgesic medication in emergency services , 2010 .

[15]  D. Birolini,et al.  The "oligoanalgesia problem" in the emergency care. , 2007, Clinics.

[16]  The integrated approach to the management of pain. , 1986, National Institutes of Health consensus development conference consensus statement.