“Think about how fascinating this is”: Engagement in academic blogs across disciplines

[1]  K. Hyland,et al.  Reworking research: Interactions in academic articles and blogs , 2019, Discourse Studies.

[2]  María Luisa Carrió-Pastor.  Chapter 3. Authorial engagement in business emails , 2019, Engagement in Professional Genres.

[3]  Yvonne McLaren-Hankin.  Rebuilding Trust in the Banking Sector: Engaging with Readers in Corporate Press Releases , 2019 .

[4]  Xiaohao Ma,et al.  ‘As we can see’: Reader engagement in PhD candidature confirmation reports , 2018, Journal of English for Academic Purposes.

[5]  M. Bondi.  Try to prove me wrong : Dialogicity and audience involvement in economics blogs , 2018, Discourse, Context & Media.

[6]  M. Luzón.  Features of online ELF in research group blogs written by multilingual scholars , 2018, Discourse, Context & Media.

[7]  V. Kennedy.  The dialogic imagination , 2018 .

[8]  M. Bondi.  Blogs as interwoven polylogues: The dialogic action game , 2018 .

[9]  M. Luzón.  Connecting Genres and Languages in Online Scholarly Communication: An Analysis of Research Group Blogs , 2017 .

[10]  Alan G. Gross,et al.  Science and the Internet : Communicating Knowledge in a Digital Age , 2016 .

[11]  Ken Hyland,et al.  “We must conclude that…”:A diachronic study of academic engagement , 2016 .

[12]  Joseph J. Lee,et al.  Interactions in L1 and L2 undergraduate student writing: Interactional metadiscourse in successful and less-successful argumentative essays , 2016 .

[13]  Guangwei Hu,et al.  Disciplinary and paradigmatic influences on interactional metadiscourse in research articles , 2015 .

[14]  Merja Mahrt,et al.  Science blogging: An exploratory study of motives, styles, and audience reactions (supplementary data) , 2014 .

[15]  Enrique Lafuente-Millán.  Reader engagement across cultures, languages and contexts of publication in business research articles , 2014 .

[16]  Cornelius Puschmann,et al.  (Micro)Blogging Science? Notes on Potentials and Constraints of New Forms of Scholarly Communication , 2014 .

[17]  María José Luzón,et al.  “This is an erroneous argument”: Conflict in academic blog discussions , 2013 .

[18]  Anna Mauranen,et al.  Hybridism, edutainment, and doubt: Science blogging finding its feet , 2013 .

[19]  Lisa McGrath,et al.  Stance and engagement in pure mathematics research articles: Linking discourse features to disciplinary practices , 2012 .

[20]  Science blogs as boundary layers: Creating and understanding new writer and reader interactions through science blogging , 2011 .

[21]  Ken Hyland,et al.  Constructing proximity: Relating to readers in popular and professional science , 2010 .

[22]  Inna Kouper,et al.  Science blogs and public engagement with science: practices, challenges, and opportunities , 2010 .

[23]  Greg Myers,et al.  The Discourse of Blogs and Wikis , 2009 .

[24]  K. Grafton.  Situating the public social actions of blog posts , 2009 .

[25]  Sara Kjellberg,et al.  Scholarly blogging practice as situated genre: an analytical framework based on genre theory , 2009, Inf. Res..

[26]  Eva Amsen.  Who Benefits From Science Blogging , 2008 .

[27]  Ken Hyland,et al.  Disciplinary voices: Interactions in research writing , 2008 .

[28]  Jenny Fry,et al.  The intellectual and social organization of academic fields and the shaping of digital resources , 2007, J. Inf. Sci..

[29]  Jill Walker,et al.  Blogging from inside the ivory tower , 2006 .

[30]  Martin Bygate,et al.  Applied Linguistics: A Pragmatic Discipline, a Generic Discipline? , 2005 .

[31]  Nigel Harwood,et al.  ‘We Do Not Seem to Have a Theory … The Theory I Present Here Attempts to Fill This Gap’: Inclusive and Exclusive Pronouns in Academic Writing , 2005 .

[32]  Ken Hyland,et al.  Stance and engagement: a model of interaction in academic discourse , 2005 .

[33]  Aldo de Moor,et al.  Beyond Personal Webpublishing: An Exploratory Study of Conversational Blogging Practices , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[34]  K. Hyland,et al.  Engagement and Disciplinarity: the other side of evaluation , 2004 .

[35]  K. Hyland,et al.  Patterns of engagement: dialogic features and L2 student writing , 2004 .

[36]  K. Hyland,et al.  Disciplinary interactions: metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing , 2004 .

[37]  Dimitra Koutsantoni,et al.  Attitude, certainty and allusions to common knowledge in scientific research articles , 2004 .

[38]  K. Hyland,et al.  Directives: argument and engagement in academic writing. , 2002 .

[39]  Ken Hyland,et al.  What do they mean? Questions in academic writing , 2002 .

[40]  KEN HYLAND,et al.  Bringing in the Reader , 2001 .

[41]  K. Hyland,et al.  Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing , 2001 .

[42]  Rob Kling,et al.  Not just a matter of time: Field differences and the shaping of electronic media in supporting scientific communication , 1999, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[43]  Chih-Hua Kuo,et al.  The Use of Personal Pronouns: Role Relationships in Scientific Journal Articles. , 1999 .

[44]  J. Swales,et al.  Consider this: The role of imperatives in scholarly writing , 1998 .

[45]  Tony Becher,et al.  Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines , 1991 .

[46]  E. Schegloff,et al.  Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction , 1979 .