Geometrical resolution limits and detection mechanisms in the oral cavity.

The objective of this work is to gain more insight into the processes of oral perception of food texture. Particularly, the limits for detectable thickness differences of objects, which are evaluated in the human mouth, are investigated. In a sensory study small, flexible circular disks (diameter in mm range) of varying thickness (in microm range) and material properties are evaluated between tongue and palate in human subjects. The thicker sample is identified in pair comparison tests. Experimental evidence suggests the existence of one detection process (attempt to align tongue and palate and the disk between them) to which the tongue-palate system reacts in two different ways: (1) by bending the disk (thickness below 125 microm, Young's modulus of 480 MPa) and (2) by impressing the disk into the tongue (thickness above approximately 200 microm, Young's modulus of 480 MPa), whereas the first reaction is necessarily followed by the second if the first one fails. For both ranges, differences in thickness of 25 microm can be detected. The two reaction processes cover isolated ranges and leave an insecure detection range in between them, for which neither one of the processes applies. Since deformation and load distribution on the disk are supposed to play a major role in the first detection process (the loads exerted on the disk in order to bend it are compared), we formulate a mathematical model to quantify these mechanical effects. The model is employed to identify parameter constellations (thickness, material properties) for which the insecure range is omitted or the range is enlarged. Theoretical findings are confirmed by further experiments. Their results are consistent with the characteristics and functioning of the mechanoreceptors in-mouth.

[1]  Morten Meilgaard,et al.  Sensory Evaluation Techniques , 2020 .

[2]  V J Napadow,et al.  Intramural mechanics of the human tongue in association with physiological deformations. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  J. G. Williams,et al.  Large strain time dependent behavior of cheese , 2003 .

[4]  W. Kier,et al.  Trunks, Tongues, and Tentacles: Moving with Skeletons of Muscle , 1989 .

[5]  Yuki Chiba,et al.  Tongue pressure on loop of transpalatal arch during deglutition. , 2003, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[6]  F. Bosman,et al.  The influence of density and material on oral perception of ball size with and without palatal coverage. , 2002, Archives of oral biology.

[7]  T. Sorvari,et al.  A scanning electron microscopic study of the dorsal surface of the human tongue. , 1985, Acta anatomica.

[8]  F. Nakazawa,et al.  PALATAL PRESSURE PATTERNS OF GELATIN GELS IN THE MOUTH , 1991 .

[9]  F. Nakazawa,et al.  EFFECTS OF VISCOSITY OF LIQUID FOODS ON PALATAL PRESSURE , 1991 .

[10]  H. Gray Gray's Anatomy , 1858 .

[11]  K O Johnson,et al.  The limit of tactile spatial resolution in humans , 1994, Neurology.

[12]  Harry T. Lawless,et al.  Sensory Evaluation of Food: Principles and Practices , 1998 .

[13]  S. Timoshenko,et al.  THEORY OF PLATES AND SHELLS , 1959 .

[14]  A. Szczesniak Texture is a sensory property , 2002 .

[15]  Norbert Henze,et al.  Stochastik für Einsteiger , 1997 .

[16]  D. Kilcast,et al.  Exploring difficult textural properties of fruit and vegetables for the elderly in Finland and the United Kingdom , 2004 .

[17]  Kenneth O. Johnson,et al.  The roles and functions of cutaneous mechanoreceptors , 2001, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[18]  K. Hiiemae,et al.  MECHANISMS OF FOOD REDUCTION, TRANSPORT AND DEGLUTITION: HOW THE TEXTURE OF FOOD AFFECTS FEEDING BEHAVIOR , 2004 .