Phase II clinical trials: issues and practices

Most of the Phase II trials are conducted for evaluating the efficacy of cancer treatment and advancing it to Phase III studies. The future progress in improving cancer therapy can be expedited by better prioritizing the options for Phase III evaluations. Phase II trials, historically, have been key in this prioritization process. Relevant trial designs that have been used include Phase II selection designs, randomized phase II designs that include a reference standard-treatment control arm, phase I/II designs, phase II/III designs. The keys issues in these study designs are: i. Selection of historical control ii. Heterogeneity iii. Adaptive signature design iv. Randomization (choice Phase II versus Phase IIb) v. Balancing randomization while maintaining the expected sample size in the phase II clinical studies

[1]  M. Schell,et al.  Continuous Toxicity Monitoring in Phase II Trials in Oncology , 2005, Biometrics.

[2]  S. Rai,et al.  Robustness of an Odds‐ratio Test in a Stratified Group Sequential Trial with a Binary Outcome Measure , 2007, Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift.

[3]  Boris Freidlin,et al.  Design issues of randomized phase II trials and a proposal for phase II screening trials. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  Shesh N Rai,et al.  Flexible bivariate phase II clinical trial design incorporating toxicity and response on different schedules. , 2013, Statistics in medicine.

[5]  Shesh N. Rai,et al.  Operating characteristics of a Simon two-stage phase II clinical trial design incorporating continuous toxicity monitoring. , 2012, Pharmaceutical statistics.

[6]  R. Simon,et al.  Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials. , 1989, Controlled clinical trials.

[7]  Daniel J Sargent,et al.  Randomized Phase II Clinical Trials , 2014, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[8]  R. Simon,et al.  The Cross-Validated Adaptive Signature Design , 2010, Clinical Cancer Research.

[9]  Christopher N. Barnes,et al.  Modeling Heterogeneity in Phase II Clinical Trials , 2010 .

[10]  The effects of heterogeneity on Simon Phase II clinical trial design operating characteristics , 2010 .

[11]  D J Sargent,et al.  A flexible design for multiple armed screening trials , 2001, Statistics in medicine.

[12]  P. Lara,et al.  The hazards of randomized phase II trials. , 2012, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.