Quality labeled faces in the wild (QLFW): a database for studying face recognition in real-world environments

The varying quality of face images is an important challenge that limits the effectiveness of face recognition technology when applied in real-world applications. Existing face image databases do not consider the effect of distortions that commonly occur in real-world environments. This database (QLFW) represents an initial attempt to provide a set of labeled face images spanning the wide range of quality, from no perceived impairment to strong perceived impairment for face detection and face recognition applications. Types of impairment include JPEG2000 compression, JPEG compression, additive white noise, Gaussian blur and contrast change. Subjective experiments are conducted to assess the perceived visual quality of faces under different levels and types of distortions and also to assess the human recognition performance under the considered distortions. One goal of this work is to enable automated performance evaluation of face recognition technologies in the presence of different types and levels of visual distortions. This will consequently enable the development of face recognition systems that can operate reliably on real-world visual content in the presence of real-world visual distortions. Another goal is to enable the development and assessment of visual quality metrics for face images and for face detection and recognition applications.

[1]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Multiscale structural similarity for image quality assessment , 2003, The Thrity-Seventh Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems & Computers, 2003.

[2]  B. V. K. Vijaya Kumar,et al.  Efficient design of advanced correlation filters for robust distortion-tolerant face recognition , 2003, Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance, 2003..

[3]  Thirimachos Bourlai,et al.  Quality metrics for practical face recognition , 2012, Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR2012).

[4]  Michael W. Marcellin,et al.  JPEG2000 - image compression fundamentals, standards and practice , 2002, The Kluwer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science.

[5]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[6]  Marwan Mattar,et al.  Labeled Faces in the Wild: A Database forStudying Face Recognition in Unconstrained Environments , 2008 .

[7]  Gerhard Rigoll,et al.  High quality face recognition in JPEG compressed images , 1999, Proceedings 1999 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. 99CH36348).

[8]  Wilson S. Geisler,et al.  Image quality assessment based on a degradation model , 2000, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[9]  Gustavo de Veciana,et al.  An information fidelity criterion for image quality assessment using natural scene statistics , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[10]  Rama Chellappa,et al.  Robust image based face recognition , 2000, Proceedings 2000 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. No.00CH37101).

[11]  Sébastien Marcel,et al.  Spoofing in 2D face recognition with 3D masks and anti-spoofing with Kinect , 2013, 2013 IEEE Sixth International Conference on Biometrics: Theory, Applications and Systems (BTAS).

[12]  Terence Sim,et al.  The CMU Pose, Illumination, and Expression Database , 2003, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..