Strengthening Grade 3-5 Students’ Foundational Knowledge of Rational Numbers

Background American students have done poorly in algebra and that has generated policy concerns about preparing students for STEM careers. There has been growing recognition that the algebra problem may begin in earlier grades when students do not adequately master rational numbers. Purpose The study provided a series of workshops organized around problematic issues that students have in learning rational numbers. The research was designed to help all grade 3-5 teachers in a single school district help students gain in their knowledge of rational numbers. Population The population was drawn from one large school district (13 schools) and included 140 teachers and 2,845 students matched pre to post. Research Design The study used a quasi-experimental design. As all teachers in the district were involved, there was no control group. Findings On the basis of pre-post testing, girl and boy students, as well as students from diverse SES schools demonstrated large gains in their knowledge of rational numbers. There were no significant differences in gains for girls and boys at any of the three grade levels, but SES remained a main effect for gains in achievement for grades 3 and 4 even after entering prior achievement as a covariate and the interaction between SES and gender was significant for grade 5. Recommendations The findings provide clear evidence that students can make notable gains in learning rational numbers if they are given the opportunity to do so. The authors provide their intentions to further analyze the quantitative data (presented in this paper) with qualitative data that were collected in the study (e.g., providing open-ended response opportunities for students to respond to rational number questions like, “What is a fraction? What is a decimal? What is a percent?”

[1]  Gus Riveros So Much Reform, So Little Change: The Persistence of Failure in Urban Schools, by Charles Payne , 2012, Alberta Journal of Educational Research.

[2]  Lois A. Stoehr The Death and Life of the Great American School System: How Testing and Choice are Undermining Education , 2012 .

[3]  T. Good Reflections on Editing The Elementary School Journal in an Era of Constant School Reform , 2011, The Elementary School Journal.

[4]  B. Davis Mathematics Teachers' Subtle, Complex Disciplinary Knowledge , 2011, Science.

[5]  Maggie B. McGatha,et al.  Methods of Instructional Improvement in Algebra , 2010 .

[6]  Richard M. Ingersoll,et al.  Is the Supply of Mathematics and Science Teachers Sufficient? , 2010 .

[7]  Matthew C. Makel,et al.  Sex differences in the right tail of cognitive abilities: A 30 year examination , 2010 .

[8]  T. Good,et al.  Accountability and Educational Reform: A Critical Analysis of Four Perspectives and Considerations for Enhancing Reform Efforts , 2010 .

[9]  Laura M. Desimone,et al.  Professional Development in the Accountability Context: Building Capacity to Achieve Standards , 2010 .

[10]  Michael R. Harwell,et al.  Student Eligibility for a Free Lunch as an SES Measure in Education Research , 2010 .

[11]  Larry Cuban As Good As It Gets: What School Reform Brought to Austin , 2010 .

[12]  Sian L. Beilock,et al.  Female teachers’ math anxiety affects girls’ math achievement , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Leslie P. Steffe,et al.  Children's Fractional Knowledge , 2009 .

[14]  Paul Cobb,et al.  The Consequences of Experimentalism in Formulating Recommendations for Policy and Practice in Mathematics Education , 2008 .

[15]  A. Collins,et al.  Commentary on the Final Report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel , 2008 .

[16]  Joanne Lobato On Learning Processes and the National Mathematics Advisory Panel Report , 2008 .

[17]  K.P.E. Gravemeijer,et al.  Fractions, percentages, decimals and proportions : a learning-teaching trajectory for grade 4, 5 and 6 , 2008 .

[18]  Timothy F. Slater,et al.  Analysis of the Astronomy Diagnostic Test , 2007 .

[19]  Eric M. Dunleavy,et al.  Literacy in Everyday Life: Results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy. NCES 2007-490. , 2007 .

[20]  Marilyn E. Strutchens,et al.  A Closer Look at Gender in NAEP Mathematics Achievement and Affect Data: Intersections with Achievement, Race/Ethnicity, and Socioeconomic Status. , 2006 .

[21]  S. Nichols,et al.  Comprehensive School Reform: An Observational Study of Teaching in Grades 3 through 5 , 2006, The Elementary School Journal.

[22]  B. Weiss,et al.  Quick Assessment of Literacy in Primary Care: The Newest Vital Sign , 2005, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[23]  Susan Carey,et al.  Never getting to zero: Elementary school students’ understanding of the infinite divisibility of number and matter , 2005, Cognitive Psychology.

[24]  Selcuk R. Sirin Socioeconomic Status and Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analytic Review of Research , 2005 .

[25]  P. Davis-Kean,et al.  The influence of parent education and family income on child achievement: the indirect role of parental expectations and the home environment. , 2005, Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association.

[26]  Jessy J Sielski What we know now that we didn't know then. , 2005, Michigan medicine.

[27]  Diane F. Halpern,et al.  A Cognitive-Process Taxonomy for Sex Differences in Cognitive Abilities , 2004 .

[28]  S. Nichols,et al.  America's Teenagers--Myths and Realities: Media Images, Schooling, and the Social Costs of Careless Indifference , 2004 .

[29]  David T. Burkam,et al.  Social-Class Differences in Summer Learning Between Kindergarten and First Grade: Model Specification and Estimation , 2004 .

[30]  Steven A Hecht,et al.  Sources of individual differences in fraction skills. , 2003, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[31]  Jutta Levin,et al.  COGNITIVE PATTERNS OF GENDER DIFFERENCES ON MATHEMATICS ADMISSIONS TESTS , 2002 .

[32]  Thomas R. Post,et al.  Initial Fraction Learning by Fourth- and Fifth-Grade Students: A Comparison of the Effects of Using Commercial Curricula with the Effects of Using the Rational Number Project Curriculum. , 2002 .

[33]  G. Guo,et al.  Gender Differences in Mathematical Trajectories , 2001 .

[34]  B. Rimer,et al.  General Performance on a Numeracy Scale among Highly Educated Samples , 2001, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[35]  Gerard Seegers,et al.  Motivational and Gender Differences: Sixth-Grade Students' Mathematical Problem-Solving Behavior. , 2000 .

[36]  John Olive,et al.  From Fractions to Rational Numbers of Arithmetic: A Reorganization Hypothesis. , 1999 .

[37]  Geoffrey B. Saxe,et al.  Relations Between Classroom Practices and Student Learning in the Domain of Fractions , 1999 .

[38]  Steven A. Hecht,et al.  Toward an information processing account of individual differences in fraction skills , 1998 .

[39]  T. P. Carpenter,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of Gender Differences in Young Children’s Mathematical Thinking , 1998 .

[40]  Elizabeth Fennema,et al.  New Perspectives on Gender Differences in Mathematics: A Reprise , 1998 .

[41]  V. Battistich,et al.  Teacher Beliefs and Practices in Schools Serving Communities That Differ in Socioeconomic Level , 1996 .

[42]  W. Dunlap,et al.  Meta-Analysis of Experiments With Matched Groups or Repeated Measures Designs , 1996 .

[43]  M. Boekaerts,et al.  Gender-Related Differences in Self-Referenced Cognitions in Relation to Mathematics. , 1996 .

[44]  D. Berliner,et al.  The Manufactured Crisis: Myths, Fraud, and the Attack on America's Public Schools , 1996 .

[45]  Gaea Leinhardt,et al.  Percent: A Privileged Proportion , 1995 .

[46]  Nancy K. Mack Confounding whole-number and fraction concepts when building on informal knowledge. , 1995 .

[47]  Ronald G. Ehrenberg,et al.  Do Teachers' Race, Gender, and Ethnicity Matter? Evidence from the National Educational Longitudinal Study of 1988 , 1995 .

[48]  D. Entwisle,et al.  When expectations work: race and socioeconomic differences in school performance , 1994 .

[49]  B. Hart,et al.  Prediction of school outcomes based on early language production and socioeconomic factors. , 1994, Child development.

[50]  Doris R. Entwisle,et al.  Summer Setback: Race, Poverty, School Composition, and Mathematics Achievement in the First Two Years of School. , 1992 .

[51]  D. Tirosh,et al.  Insights fourth and fifth graders bring to multiplication and division with decimals , 1990 .

[52]  D. Wearne Acquiring meaning for decimal fraction symbols: A one year follow-up , 1990 .

[53]  P. Lachenbruch Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[54]  Susan R. Goldman,et al.  Individual differences in extended practice functions and solution strategies for basic addition facts. , 1989 .

[55]  C. Benbow Some of the pathological assumptions in the sciences of gender , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[56]  Vicky L. Kouba Results of the Fourth NAEP Assessment of Mathematics: Number, Operations, and Word Problems. , 1988 .

[57]  Alan Feingold,et al.  Cognitive gender differences are disappearing. , 1988 .

[58]  L. Corno,et al.  A Factorial Experiment in Teachers' Written Feedback on Student Homework: Changing Teacher Behavior a Little Rather Than a Lot. , 1985 .

[59]  K. White The relation between socioeconomic status and academic achievement. , 1982 .

[60]  L. Tanner The Scientific Basis of the Art of Teaching , 1981 .

[61]  T. Good Teacher Expectations and Student Perceptions: A Decade of Research. , 1981 .

[62]  Douglas A. Grouws,et al.  The Missouri Mathematics Effectiveness Project: An experimental study in fourth-grade classrooms. , 1979 .

[63]  T. Good,et al.  Teaching Effects , 1977 .

[64]  T. P. Carpenter Results and Implications of the NAEP Mathematics Assessment: Elementary School. , 1975 .

[65]  Karl G. Zahn Use of class time in eighth-grade arithmetic , 1966 .

[66]  George H. Deer,et al.  The Use of Class Time in Arithmetic , 1960 .

[67]  William A. Brownell,et al.  The Place of Meaning in the Teaching of Arithmetic , 1947, The Elementary School Journal.

[68]  H. W. Kircher Study of Percentage in Grade VIII A , 1926, The Elementary School Journal.

[69]  E. Ross,et al.  Report of the Committee of Ten , 1912, American Journal of Sociology.

[70]  Hung-Hsi Wu,et al.  Fractions, Decimals, and Rational Numbers , 2014 .

[71]  Seth Brown,et al.  Middle School Mathematics Professional Development Impact Study Findings After the First Year of Implementation Executive Summary April 2010 , 2010 .

[72]  M. Garet,et al.  Middle School Mathematics Professional Development Impact Study , 2010 .

[73]  Melissa D. McNaught,et al.  Three Pillars of a Sound Mathematics Education: Curriculum, Teaching, and Assessment , 2008 .

[74]  J. Remy Report from Working Group 1 , 2007 .

[75]  Jacquelynne S. Eccles,et al.  Families, Schools, and Developing Achievement-Related Motivations and Engagement. , 2007 .

[76]  J. Hiebert,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF CLASSROOM MATHEMATICS TEACHING ON STUDENTS ’ LEARNING , 2006 .

[77]  Elizabeth Greenberg,et al.  A First Look at the Literacy of America's Adults in the 21st Century. NCES 2006-470. , 2006 .

[78]  J. Hyde,et al.  The Gender Similarities Hypothesis , 2005 .

[79]  Tom Loveless Trends in Math: The Importance of Basic Skills , 2003 .

[80]  R. Horseman As good as it gets. , 2002, Journal of the California Dental Association.

[81]  H. Wu,et al.  How To Prepare Students for Algebra , 2001 .

[82]  M. Hallinan Sociological perspectives on black-white inequalities in American schooling , 2001 .

[83]  Susan B. Empson,et al.  Equal sharing and shared meaning: The development of fraction concepts in a first-grade classroom , 1999 .

[84]  L. Corno,et al.  Teachers as Innovators , 1997 .

[85]  M. Lecompte,et al.  The Way Schools Work: A Sociological Analysis of Education , 1995 .

[86]  Richard Lesh,et al.  Rational number, ratio and proportion , 1992 .

[87]  Andrew C. Porter,et al.  A Curriculum Out of Balance: The Case of Elementary School Mathematics. Research Series No. 191. , 1988 .

[88]  K. Weick Small wins: Redefining the scale of social problems. , 1984 .

[89]  Douglas A. Grouws,et al.  Active mathematics teaching , 1983 .

[90]  Jere Brophy,et al.  Teacher-student relationships: causes and consequences , 1974 .

[91]  F. L. Pigge,et al.  Retention efficiency of meaningful teaching , 1965 .

[92]  N. Koblitz,et al.  Radical Equations: Math Literacy and Civil Rights 328 Notices of the Ams Volume 49, Number 3 Radical Equations: Math Literacy and Civil Rights , 2022 .