Coordination in Human and Non-human Primate Groups: Why Compare and How?

This chapter integrates the six chapters in Part I of this book. They offer different treatments of the theoretical aspects of small group coordination, thereby providing a framework for how coordination behaviour can be studied from the perspectives of social psychology and primatology. Although we have a good working definition of group coordination and have scientifically established that groups of all primates, including humans, are adapted to improve survival, we are less informed about the behaviours that keep groups together and resolve conflicts. Chapter 2 helps to narrow this gap by integrating contemporary thought on coordination and offering an inclusive model for investigators to use in their analysis of both human and non-human primate groups. Chapter 3 informs us about how and why group movements of non-human primates offer a particularly rich arena with which to study primate group coordination. Chapter 4 presents a thorough analysis of a classic tool in group coordination theory (Wittenbaum and colleagues’ Coordination Mechanism Circumplex) and how it can be used to understand behaviours of both an observable and tacit nature that occur before and during the actual coordination task. Chapter 5 takes another perspective – that of high-dynamic anaesthesia teams – to show how theories of coordination can be applied to prevent harm in the operating room. The final chapter offers an outline of how the analysis of the group task itself can be used to develop categories of group processes and performance, adapting hierarchical task analysis tool for in-depth structural analysis.

[1]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[2]  C. List,et al.  Group decisions in humans and animals: a survey , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  Gerald Kerth,et al.  Group decision-making in animal societies , 2010 .

[4]  Margo I. Wilson,et al.  Human evolutionary psychology and animal behaviour , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[5]  M. Milinski,et al.  Volunteering leads to rock–paper–scissors dynamics in a public goods game , 2003, Nature.

[6]  Holly Arrow,et al.  Small Groups as Complex Systems: Formation, Coordination, Development, and Adaptation , 2000 .

[7]  D. Rendall,et al.  The meaning and function of grunt variants in baboons , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[8]  N. Kerr,et al.  Group Process, Group Decision, Group Action , 1992 .

[9]  Randy Hirokawa,et al.  To Err is Human, to Correct for it Divine , 2001 .

[10]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Small Groups , 2004 .

[11]  Charlotte K. Hemelrijk,et al.  Small groups from an evolutionary perspective , 2005 .

[12]  D. Povinelli,et al.  Chimpanzees are indifferent to the welfare of unrelated group members , 2005, Nature.

[13]  B. Chapais The Deep Structure of Human Society: Primate Origins and Evolution , 2010 .

[14]  J. R. Larson,et al.  Leadership Style and the Discussion of Shared and Unshared Information in Decision-Making Groups , 1998 .

[15]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  Perspectives on socially shared cognition , 1991 .

[16]  G. Stasser,et al.  Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion , 1985 .

[17]  M. Hogg,et al.  The Sage Handbook of Social Psychology , 2003 .

[18]  Claudia Fichtel,et al.  Coordination of Group Movements in Wild Verreaux's Sifakas (Propithecus Verreauxi) , 2004 .

[19]  Stanley Deetz Communication Yearbook 16 , 2012 .

[20]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Chimpanzee and Human Cultures , 1998, Current Anthropology.

[21]  Margarete Boos,et al.  Enhancing Mutual Understanding in Synchronous Computer-Mediated Communication by Training , 2003, Commun. Res..

[22]  R. Seyfarth,et al.  Acoustic Features of Female Chacma Baboon Barks , 2001 .

[23]  A. Hollingshead,et al.  From cooperative to motivated information sharing in groups: moving beyond the hidden profile paradigm , 2004 .

[24]  T. J. Roper,et al.  Group decision-making in animals , 2003, Nature.

[25]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Grounding in communication , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[26]  Paula L. Rechner,et al.  Experiential Effects of Dialectical Inquiry, Devil's Advocacy and Consensus Approaches to Strategic Decision Making , 1989 .

[27]  S. Moscovici,et al.  Biased information search in group decision making. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  Michael A. West,et al.  Effective Teamwork: Practical Lessons from Organizational Research , 2004 .

[29]  Dennis S. Gouran,et al.  The Evolution and Current Status of the Functional Perspective on Communication in Decision-Making and Problem-Solving Groups , 1993 .

[30]  E. Sober,et al.  Reintroducing group selection to the human behavioral sciences , 1994 .

[31]  Bruno S. Frey,et al.  Self‐interest and collective action: The economics and psychology of public goods , 1982 .

[32]  M. S. Poole,et al.  Theories of Small Groups: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. , 2005 .