Can Anyone Be 'the' One? Evidence on Mate Selection from Speed Dating

Marriage data show a strong degree of positive assortative mating along a variety of attributes. But since marriage is an equilibrium outcome, it is unclear whether positive sorting is the result of preferences rather than opportunities. We assess the relative importance of preferences and opportunities in dating behaviour, using unique data from a large commercial speed dating agency. While the speed dating design gives us a direct observation of individual preferences, the random allocation of participants across events generates an exogenous source of variation in opportunities and allows us to identify the role of opportunities separately from that of preferences. We find that both women and men equally value physical attributes, such as age and weight, and that there is positive sorting along age, height, and education. The role of individual preferences, however, is outplayed by that of opportunities. Along some attributes (such as occupation, height and smoking) opportunities explain almost all the estimated variation in demand. Along other attributes (such as age), the role of preferences is more substantial, but never dominant. Despite this, preferences have a part when we observe a match, i.e., when two individuals propose to one another.

[1]  David Marmaros,et al.  How Do Friendships Form? , 2005 .

[2]  Emir Kamenica,et al.  Racial Preferences in Dating: Evidence from a Speed Dating Experiment , 2004 .

[3]  C. Hamilton Marriage as a trade , 2022 .

[4]  Matthijs Kalmijn,et al.  Assortative Mating by Cultural and Economic Occupational Status , 1994, American Journal of Sociology.

[5]  M. L. Cooper,et al.  Seventy years of research on personality and close relationships: substantive and methodological trends over time. , 2002, Journal of personality.

[6]  Dan Ariely,et al.  What Makes You Click? Mate Preferences and Matching Outcomes in Online Dating , 2006 .

[7]  E. Westermarck The History of Human Marriage , 1891 .

[8]  R. Trivers Parental investment and sexual selection , 1972 .

[9]  H. Flap,et al.  Assortative Meeting and Mating: Unintended Consequences of Organized Settings for Partner Choices , 2001 .

[10]  Peter Fredriksson,et al.  Ethnic Enclaves and the Economic Success of Immigrants - Evidence from a Natural Experiment , 2001 .

[11]  Melvyn G. Coles,et al.  Marriage and Class , 1997 .

[12]  A. Siow,et al.  Who Marries Whom and Why , 2006, Journal of Political Economy.

[13]  Emir Kamenica,et al.  Gender Differences in Mate Selection: Evidence From a Speed Dating Experiment , 2006 .

[14]  G. Becker Chapter Title: a Theory of Marriage a Theory of Marriage , 2022 .

[15]  Richard H. Steckel,et al.  Stature and the Standard of Living , 1995 .

[16]  M. Barron,et al.  Assimilation in American Life: The Role of Race, Religion, and National Origins. , 1964 .

[17]  Michael Lynn,et al.  Responses to Lonely Hearts Advertisements , 1984 .

[18]  John H. Pencavel Assortative Mating by Schooling and the Work Behavior of Wives and Husbands , 1998 .

[19]  Linda Y. Wong,et al.  Structural Estimation of Marriage Models , 2002, Journal of Labor Economics.

[20]  H. Blossfeld,et al.  Who marries whom? : educational systems as marriage markets in modern societies , 2003 .

[21]  John W. Mohr,et al.  Cultural Capital, Educational Attainment, and Marital Selection , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[22]  Lones Smith,et al.  The Marriage Model with Search Frictions , 1997 .

[23]  R. Kurzban,et al.  HurryDate: Mate preferences in action , 2005 .

[24]  Lones Smith,et al.  Assortative Matching and Search , 2000 .

[25]  R. Mare Five decades of educational assortative mating. , 1991 .

[26]  L. A. Goodman Simple Models for the Analysis of Association in Cross-Classifications Having Ordered Categories , 1979 .

[27]  Ali Hortacsu,et al.  What Makes You Click: An Empirical Analysis of Online Dating ⁄ , 2005 .

[28]  M. Kalmijn,et al.  Intermarriage and homogamy: causes, patterns, trends. , 1998, Annual review of sociology.

[29]  B. Moldovanu,et al.  The Theory of Assortative Matching Based on Costly Signals , 2005 .

[30]  Alberto Bisin,et al.  Religious Intermarriage and Socialization in the United States , 2004, Journal of Political Economy.

[31]  M. Bagnoli,et al.  Courtship as a Waiting Game , 1991, Journal of Political Economy.

[32]  H. Blossfeld,et al.  Who Marries Whom , 2003 .