A low-cost particle counter as a realtime fine-particle mass monitor.

Exposure to particles with aerodynamic diameters less than 2.5 μm is estimated to cause significant morbidity and mortality worldwide leading many countries to develop ambient air pollution standards and guidelines. At local scales, community and environmental justice groups are also concerned about PM 2.5 concentrations that may be elevated above regional concentrations typically measured by centrally located monitors and standards as well. In an attempt to develop a low cost, easy to use monitor we evaluated a low-cost optical particle counter, the Dylos™, as a fine particulate mass sensor. Modified into a system called the Berkeley Aerosol Information Recording System (BAIRS), we compared performance against standard commercial instruments in chambers using polystyrene latex spheres, ammonium sulphate, and woodsmoke and in an urban ambient setting. Overall we find that the limit of detection of the BAIRS is less than 1 μg m (-3) and the resolution is better than 1 μg m(-3) for PM 2.5. The BAIRS sizes small (<0.5 μm) particles, and is able to accurately estimate the mass concentration of particles of varying composition including organic, inorganic, and ambient particles. It is able to measure concentrations up to 10.0 mg m (-3). In an ambient roof-top test of the BAIRS and a more expensive commercially available light scattering particle monitor the BAIRS response tracked well with the commercial monitor and daily means were within 80% of each other. We conclude that with appropriate modification the system could be developed into an accurate low cost realtime particle mass monitor for use in a wide range of applications.

[1]  Klaus Willeke,et al.  Aerosol Measurement: Principles, Techniques, and Applications , 2001 .

[2]  Candis Claiborn,et al.  An Analysis of the Association Between Respiratory Symptoms in Subjects with Asthma and Daily Air Pollution in Spokane, Washington , 2004, Inhalation toxicology.

[3]  S. Vedal,et al.  Temporal patterns in daily measurements of inorganic and organic speciated PM2.5 in Denver. , 2010, Atmospheric environment.

[4]  Manuel Pastor,et al.  Environmental Justice and Southern California’s “Riskscape” , 2001 .

[5]  D. Dockery,et al.  Health Effects of Fine Particulate Air Pollution: Lines that Connect , 2006, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[6]  D. Dockery,et al.  Health Effects of Fine Particulate Air Pollution: Lines that Connect , 2006, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[7]  Sumi Mehta,et al.  Indoor air pollution from household use of solid fuels , 2004 .

[8]  Chang-Yu Wu,et al.  Combustion Aerosols: Factors Governing Their Size and Composition and Implications to Human Health , 2000, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[9]  L Sheppard,et al.  Effects of ambient air pollution on symptoms of asthma in Seattle-area children enrolled in the CAMP study. , 2000, Environmental health perspectives.

[10]  K Teschke,et al.  From measures to models: an evaluation of air pollution exposure assessment for epidemiological studies of pregnant women , 2007, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[11]  Who Europe Air Quality Guidelines Global Update 2005: Particulate Matter, ozone, nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide , 2006 .

[12]  J. Schwartz,et al.  Reduction in fine particulate air pollution and mortality: Extended follow-up of the Harvard Six Cities study. , 2006, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[13]  J. Schwartz,et al.  Association of fine particulate matter from different sources with daily mortality in six U.S. cities. , 2000, Environmental health perspectives.

[14]  R. Burnett,et al.  Spatial Analysis of Air Pollution and Mortality in Los Angeles , 2005, Epidemiology.

[15]  Eduardo Canuz,et al.  An inexpensive light-scattering particle monitor: field validation. , 2007, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.

[16]  Michael Jerrett,et al.  Geographies of Risk in Studies Linking Chronic Air Pollution Exposure to Health Outcomes , 2005, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A.

[17]  A. Wexler,et al.  Atmospheric aerosol models for systems including the ions H+, NH4+, Na+, SO42−, NO3−, Cl−, Br−, and H2O , 2002 .

[18]  Philip K Hopke,et al.  Comparison of sources of submicron particle number concentrations measured at two sites in Rochester, NY. , 2009, The Science of the total environment.