Impact of Transcriptional Properties on Essentiality and Evolutionary Rate
暂无分享,去创建一个
Jong Bhak | Jung Kyoon Choi | Jungmin Seo | Sangsoo Kim | J. Bhak | J. Choi | Sang Cheol Kim | Sangsoo Kim | Jungmin Seo
[1] Scott A. Rifkin,et al. Duplicate genes increase gene expression diversity within and between species , 2004, Nature Genetics.
[2] A. E. Hirsh,et al. Noise Minimization in Eukaryotic Gene Expression , 2004, PLoS biology.
[3] S. Pääbo,et al. A Neutral Model of Transcriptome Evolution , 2004, PLoS biology.
[4] Mads Kærn,et al. Noise in eukaryotic gene expression , 2003, Nature.
[5] M. Lynch,et al. The transcriptional consequences of mutation and natural selection in Caenorhabditis elegans , 2005, Nature Genetics.
[6] A. E. Hirsh,et al. Evolutionary rate depends on number of protein-protein interactions independently of gene expression level , 2004, BMC Evolutionary Biology.
[7] S. Pääbo,et al. Intra- and Interspecific Variation in Primate Gene Expression Patterns , 2002, Science.
[8] H. Akashi,et al. Codon bias evolution in Drosophila. Population genetics of mutation-selection drift. , 1997, Gene.
[9] H. Akashi,et al. Gene expression and molecular evolution. , 2001, Current opinion in genetics & development.
[10] John Parsch,et al. Rapid evolution of male-biased gene expression in Drosophila , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[11] Ertugrul M. Ozbudak,et al. Regulation of noise in the expression of a single gene , 2002, Nature Genetics.
[12] L. Duret,et al. Determinants of substitution rates in mammalian genes: expression pattern affects selection intensity but not mutation rate. , 2000, Molecular biology and evolution.
[13] S. Bron,et al. Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis , 2002 .
[14] Ziheng Yang,et al. PAML: a program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood , 1997, Comput. Appl. Biosci..
[15] X. Gu,et al. Rapid evolution of expression and regulatory divergences after yeast gene duplication. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[16] C. Pál,et al. Highly expressed genes in yeast evolve slowly. , 2001, Genetics.
[17] P. Sharp,et al. DNA sequence evolution: the sounds of silence. , 1995, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.
[18] Blake C Meyers,et al. Effects of gene expression on molecular evolution in Arabidopsis thaliana and Arabidopsis lyrata. , 2004, Molecular biology and evolution.
[19] Scott A. Rifkin,et al. Evolution of gene expression in the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup , 2003, Nature Genetics.
[20] Bernardo Lemos,et al. Regulatory evolution across the protein interaction network , 2004, Nature Genetics.
[21] D. Wall,et al. Gene expression level influences amino acid usage, but not codon usage, in the tsetse fly endosymbiont Wigglesworthia. , 2003, Microbiology.
[22] X. Gu. Statistical Framework for Phylogenomic Analysis of Gene Family Expression Profiles , 2004, Genetics.
[23] Jeffrey W. Smith,et al. Stochastic Gene Expression in a Single Cell , 2022 .
[24] J. Hasty,et al. Translating the noise , 2002, Nature Genetics.
[25] A. E. Hirsh,et al. Protein dispensability and rate of evolution , 2001, Nature.
[26] P. Sharp,et al. Determinants of DNA sequence divergence betweenEscherichia coli andSalmonella typhimurium: Codon usage, map position, and concerted evolution , 1991, Journal of Molecular Evolution.
[27] Sudhir Kumar,et al. Gene Expression Intensity Shapes Evolutionary Rates of the Proteins Encoded by the Vertebrate Genome , 2004, Genetics.
[28] Jeffrey H. Chuang,et al. Functional Bias and Spatial Organization of Genes in Mutational Hot and Cold Regions in the Human Genome , 2004, PLoS biology.
[29] Christoph Adami,et al. Evolutionary rate depends on number of protein-protein interactions independently of gene expression level: Response , 2004, BMC Evolutionary Biology.
[30] P. Swain,et al. Intrinsic and extrinsic contributions to stochasticity in gene expression , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[31] Eugene V Koonin,et al. No simple dependence between protein evolution rate and the number of protein-protein interactions: only the most prolific interactors tend to evolve slowly , 2003, BMC Evolutionary Biology.
[32] D C Shields,et al. "Silent" sites in Drosophila genes are not neutral: evidence of selection among synonymous codons. , 1988, Molecular biology and evolution.
[33] Hiroshi Akashi,et al. Translational selection and yeast proteome evolution. , 2003, Genetics.
[34] Kevin R. Thornton,et al. The origin of new genes: glimpses from the young and old , 2003, Nature Reviews Genetics.
[35] A. E. Hirsh,et al. Functional genomic analysis of the rates of protein evolution. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[36] A. E. Hirsh,et al. Evolutionary Rate in the Protein Interaction Network , 2002, Science.
[37] Colin D. Meiklejohn,et al. Sex-Dependent Gene Expression and Evolution of the Drosophila Transcriptome , 2003, Science.
[38] C. Wilke,et al. Why highly expressed proteins evolve slowly. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[39] C. Wilke,et al. A single determinant dominates the rate of yeast protein evolution. , 2006, Molecular biology and evolution.
[40] Takashi Gojobori,et al. Metabolic efficiency and amino acid composition in the proteomes of Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[41] Michael I. Jordan,et al. Chemogenomic profiling: identifying the functional interactions of small molecules in yeast. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[42] E. Koonin,et al. Essential genes are more evolutionarily conserved than are nonessential genes in bacteria. , 2002, Genome research.
[43] Araxi O. Urrutia,et al. The signature of selection mediated by expression on human genes. , 2003, Genome research.
[44] C. Pál,et al. Genomic function: Rate of evolution and gene dispensability. , 2003, Nature.
[45] L. Wernisch,et al. Solving the riddle of codon usage preferences: a test for translational selection. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.
[46] J. Raser,et al. Control of Stochasticity in Eukaryotic Gene Expression , 2004, Science.
[47] G. Churchill,et al. Variation in gene expression within and among natural populations , 2002, Nature Genetics.
[48] Jianzhi Zhang,et al. Why Do Hubs Tend to Be Essential in Protein Networks? , 2006, PLoS genetics.
[49] C. Adami,et al. Apparent dependence of protein evolutionary rate on number of interactions is linked to biases in protein–protein interactions data sets , 2003, BMC Evolutionary Biology.
[50] Z N Oltvai,et al. Evolutionary conservation of motif constituents in the yeast protein interaction network , 2003, Nature Genetics.
[51] Corbin D. Jones,et al. Evolution of gene expression in the Drosophila olfactory system. , 2008, Molecular biology and evolution.
[52] M. King,et al. Evolution at two levels in humans and chimpanzees. , 1975, Science.