Link quality-aware call admission strategy for mobile cellular networks with link adaptation

In this paper, the performance of mobile cellular systems with link adaptation (LA) is analytically evaluated. Half- and full-rate vocoders are considered in the analysis. Mathematical expressions for the new call blocking, handoff failure, and forced termination probabilities are obtained. To our knowledge, no similar analysis considering LA exists in the literature. Also, the link quality-aware dual fractional channel reservation (LQA DFCR) scheme is proposed. In LQA DFCR, user differentiation is implemented in terms of link quality. Preference is given to users with good link quality because they require fewer resources than users with bad link quality. Numerical results show that the proposed LQA DFCR scheme effectively increases system capacity: LQA DFCR achieves more than a 11% capacity gain relative to systems with the non priority scheme (NPS) and with LA, and approximately 3% relative to the fair access prioritisation scheme (FAPS) strategy. Numerical results also show that LA yields an approximately 18% capacity increase relative to a cellular system without LA when no admission control is employed (admission control strategies further increase system capacity.) The synergy between LA and admission control strategies yields more than a 31% capacity gain

[1]  R. R. P. Jackson Introduction to Queueing Theory , 1943 .

[2]  Prem Dassanayake,et al.  User Mobility Modeling and Characterization of Mobility Patterns , 1997, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[3]  David McMillan Delay analysis of a cellular mobile priority queueing system , 1995, TNET.

[4]  S. Kourtis,et al.  Modelling cell residence time of mobile terminals in cellular radio systems , 2002 .

[5]  Don Towsley,et al.  On optimal call admission control in cellular networks , 1996, Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM '96. Conference on Computer Communications.

[6]  D. Lara-Rodriguez,et al.  Fractional channel reservation in mobile communication systems , 1999 .

[7]  Kee Chaing Chua,et al.  Adaptive quality of service handoff priority scheme for mobile multimedia networks , 2000, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol..

[8]  Mohsen Guizani,et al.  Markov modulated Poisson process model for hand-off calls in cellular systems , 2000, 2000 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference. Conference Record (Cat. No.00TH8540).

[9]  Yi-Bing Lin,et al.  Queueing priority channel assignment strategies for PCS hand-off and initial access , 1994 .

[10]  Lauro Ortigoza-Guerrero,et al.  Residence time distribution in mobile cellular systems with link adaptation , 2004, 2004 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04TH8733).

[11]  Phone Lin,et al.  Channel assignment for GSM half-rate and full-rate traffic , 2000, Comput. Commun..

[12]  Djamal Zeghlache,et al.  Performance analysis of link adaptation in wireless personal communication systems , 1997, Proceedings of ICC'97 - International Conference on Communications.

[13]  Hua Jiang,et al.  Hand-off analysis for CBWL schemes in cellular communications , 1994, Proceedings of 1994 3rd IEEE International Conference on Universal Personal Communications.

[14]  Ran Yan,et al.  Capacity of a packet switched cellular network with link adaptation , 2000, 2000 IEEE International Conference on Communications. ICC 2000. Global Convergence Through Communications. Conference Record.

[15]  Stephen S. Rappaport,et al.  On the hand-off arrival process in cellular communications , 1999, WCNC. 1999 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (Cat. No.99TH8466).

[16]  K. Homayounfar,et al.  Rate adaptive speech coding for universal multimedia access , 2003, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[17]  Yuguang Fang,et al.  Call admission control schemes and performance analysis in wireless mobile networks , 2002, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol..

[18]  Lauro Ortigoza-Guerrero,et al.  Performance evaluation of mobile wireless communication systems with link adaptation , 2003, IEEE Communications Letters.

[19]  Edward Chlebus,et al.  Is handoff traffic really Poissonian? , 1995, Proceedings of ICUPC '95 - 4th IEEE International Conference on Universal Personal Communications.

[20]  Moshe Zukerman,et al.  Performance between circuit allocation schemes for half- and full-rate connections in GSM , 1998 .

[21]  Wei Kuang Lai,et al.  Channel assignment for initial and handoff calls to improve the call-completion probability , 2003, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol..

[22]  Stephen S. Rappaport,et al.  Traffic Model and Performance Analysis for Cellular Mobile Radio Telephone Systems with Prioritized and Nonprioritized Handoff Procedures - Version 2a , 2000 .

[23]  Stephen S. Rappaport,et al.  Traffic model and performance analysis for cellular mobile radio telephone systems with prioritized and nonprioritized handoff procedures , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[24]  Michael E. Theologou,et al.  Optimal system capacity in handover prioritised schemes in cellular mobile telecommunication systems , 2000, Comput. Commun..

[25]  Lauro Ortigoza-Guerrero,et al.  Capacity optimization in multiservice mobile wireless networks with multiple fractional channel reservation , 2003, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol..

[26]  Yi-Bing Lin,et al.  The sub-rating channel assignment strategy for PCS hand-offs , 1996 .