Sparse Feature Selection Identifies H2A.Z as a Novel Pattern-Specific Biomarker for Asymmetrically Self-Renewing Distributed Stem Cells

There is a long-standing unmet clinical need for biomarkers with high specificity for distributed stem cells (DSCs) in tissues, or for use in diagnostic and therapeutic cell preparations (e.g., bone marrow). Although DSCs are essential for tissue maintenance and repair, accurate determination of their numbers for medical applications has been problematic. Previous searches for biomarkers expressed specifically in DSCs were hampered by difficulty obtaining pure DSCs and by the challenges in mining complex molecular expression data. To identify such useful and specific DSC biomarkers, we combined a novel sparse feature selection method with combinatorial molecular expression data focused on asymmetric self-renewal, a conspicuous property of DSCs. The analysis identified reduced expression of the histone H2A variant H2A.Z as a superior molecular discriminator for DSC asymmetric self-renewal. Subsequent molecular expression studies showed H2A.Z to be a novel "pattern-specific biomarker" for asymmetrically self-renewing cells, with sufficient specificity to count asymmetrically self-renewing DSCs in vitro and potentially in situ.

[1]  T. Enver,et al.  Do stem cells play dice? , 1998, Blood.

[2]  John T. Dimos,et al.  A Stem Cell Molecular Signature , 2002, Science.

[3]  Allon M. Klein,et al.  Universal patterns of stem cell fate in cycling adult tissues , 2011, Development.

[4]  John Quackenbush,et al.  Computational genetics: Computational analysis of microarray data , 2001, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[5]  P. Stadler,et al.  Expression of the wild-type p53 antioncogene induces guanine nucleotide-dependent stem cell division kinetics. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Christopher S Potten,et al.  1 – Stem cells and cellular pedigrees – a conceptual introduction , 1997 .

[7]  Mário A. T. Figueiredo Adaptive Sparseness for Supervised Learning , 2003, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[8]  J. Sherley,et al.  Molecular Cloaking of H2A.Z on Mortal DNA Chromosomes During Nonrandom Segregation , 2011, Stem cells.

[9]  Sachiko Homma,et al.  A unique library of myogenic cells from facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy subjects and unaffected relatives: family, disease and cell function , 2011, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[10]  S. A. Bohn,et al.  Cellular senescence: ex vivo p53-dependent asymmetric cell kinetics , 2001, Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology.

[11]  Y. Liu,et al.  Inosine-5'-monophosphate dehydrogenase is a rate-determining factor for p53-dependent growth regulation. , 1998, Molecular biology of the cell.

[12]  H. Green,et al.  QUANTITATIVE STUDIES OF THE GROWTH OF MOUSE EMBRYO CELLS IN CULTURE AND THEIR DEVELOPMENT INTO ESTABLISHED LINES , 1963, The Journal of cell biology.

[13]  S. Thorgeirsson,et al.  Tumor‐Initiating Label‐Retaining Cancer Cells in Human Gastrointestinal Cancers Undergo Asymmetric Cell Division , 2012, Stem cells.

[14]  Barbara Gayraud-Morel,et al.  Asymmetric division and cosegregation of template DNA strands in adult muscle satellite cells , 2006, Nature Cell Biology.

[15]  J. Sherley,et al.  Immortal DNA strand cosegregation requires p53/IMPDH-dependent asymmetric self-renewal associated with adult stem cells. , 2005, Cancer research.

[16]  Philip M. Long,et al.  Comment on " 'Stemness': Transcriptional Profiling of Embryonic and Adult Stem Cells" and "A Stem Cell Molecular Signature" (I) , 2003, Science.

[17]  J. Sherley,et al.  Asymmetric Cell Kinetics Genes: The Key to Expansion of Adult Stem Cells in Culture , 2002, Stem cells.

[18]  D. Melton,et al.  "Stemness": Transcriptional Profiling of Embryonic and Adult Stem Cells , 2002, Science.

[19]  Frank R. Burden,et al.  Optimal Sparse Descriptor Selection for QSAR Using Bayesian Methods , 2009 .

[20]  J. S. Stadler,et al.  A quantitative method for the analysis of mammalian cell proliferation in culture in terms of dividing and non‐dividing cells , 1995, Cell proliferation.

[21]  John Cairns,et al.  Mutation selection and the natural history of cancer , 1975, Nature.

[22]  T. Rando,et al.  High Incidence of Non-Random Template Strand Segregation and Asymmetric Fate Determination In Dividing Stem Cells and their Progeny , 2007, PLoS biology.

[23]  Hans Clevers,et al.  Lgr5 marks cycling, yet long-lived, hair follicle stem cells , 2008, Nature Genetics.

[24]  Dawood B. Dudekula,et al.  Verification and initial annotation of the NIA mouse 15K cDNA clone set , 2001, Nature Genetics.

[25]  J. Sherley,et al.  SACK-Expanded Hair Follicle Stem Cells Display Asymmetric Nuclear Lgr5 Expression With Non-Random Sister Chromatid Segregation , 2011, Scientific reports.

[26]  Curtis C. Harris,et al.  Microenvironmental modulation of asymmetric cell division in human lung cancer cells , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Hans Clevers,et al.  Coexistence of Quiescent and Active Adult Stem Cells in Mammals , 2010, Science.

[28]  J. Sherley A new mechanism for aging: chemical "age spots" in immortal DNA strands in distributed stem cells. , 2008, Breast disease.

[29]  Y. Liu,et al.  Comparison of bax, waf1, and IMP dehydrogenase regulation in response to wild‐type p53 expression under normal growth conditions , 1998, Journal of cellular physiology.

[30]  J. Sherley ASYMMETRIC SELF-RENEWAL: THE MARK OF THE ADULT STEM CELL , 2005 .

[31]  J. Sherley,et al.  Cosegregation of chromosomes containing immortal DNA strands in cells that cycle with asymmetric stem cell kinetics. , 2002, Cancer research.

[32]  S. Thorgeirsson,et al.  Isolation of live label-retaining cells and cells undergoing asymmetric cell division via nonrandom chromosomal cosegregation from human cancers. , 2011, Stem cells and development.

[33]  Leonard I Zon,et al.  Portrait of a stem cell. , 2002, Developmental cell.

[34]  Frank R. Burden,et al.  An Optimal Self‐Pruning Neural Network and Nonlinear Descriptor Selection in QSAR , 2009 .

[35]  M. Ko,et al.  Genome-wide expression profiling of mid-gestation placenta and embryo using a 15,000 mouse developmental cDNA microarray. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  Molly M. Stevens,et al.  Sparse feature selection methods identify unexpected global cellular response to strontium-containing materials , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  Janet L. Smith,et al.  A Resource for Discovering Specific and Universal Biomarkers for Distributed Stem Cells , 2011, PloS one.