Life cycle assessment of buildings and city quarters comparing demolition and reconstruction with refurbishment

Abstract In the building sector, the energy and the greenhouse gases embodied in the building materials are becoming increasingly important. Combined with the operational primary energy demand and the end-of-life, the whole life cycle of buildings can be assessed. In this paper, a comprehensive method for calculating the life cycle of individual buildings is presented. First, their material composition has been determined and generic values for the embodied energy, embodied greenhouse gases, energy needed and greenhouse gases emitted during disposal of the different building materials have been calculated. Subsequently these values have been integrated into an urban energy simulation software to simulate energy and emission values for buildings. A given building geometry with four different building standards was considered. The results can help to decide between building refurbishment or demolition and new construction. For example it could be shown that the share of the life cycle stage production compared to the total value rises with a better building insulation standard, as the share of the use stage decreases. The highest building refurbishment standard resulted in the best life cycle performance when compared with less ambitious refurbishment or construction of a new building of today’s standards.

[1]  Kari Alanne,et al.  The effect of material selection on life cycle energy balance: A case study on a hypothetical building model in Finland , 2015 .

[2]  José Manuel Cejudo López,et al.  A decision-making LCA for energy refurbishment of buildings: Conditions of comfort , 2014 .

[3]  John S. Monahan,et al.  An embodied carbon and energy analysis of modern methods of construction in housing: A case study us , 2011 .

[4]  Luisa F. Cabeza,et al.  Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle energy analysis (LCEA) of buildings and the building sector: A review , 2014 .

[5]  Catarina Thormark,et al.  A low energy building in a life cycle - its embodied energy, energy need for operation and recycling potential , 2002 .

[6]  Catarina Thormark,et al.  The effect of material choice on the total energy need and recycling potential of a building , 2006 .

[7]  Barbara Rossi,et al.  Life-cycle assessment of residential buildings in three different European locations, basic tool , 2012 .

[8]  Hans-Jörg Althaus,et al.  Relevance of simplifications in LCA of building components , 2009 .

[9]  Hugo Hens,et al.  Life cycle inventory of buildings: A calculation method , 2010 .

[10]  Giovanni Andrea Blengini,et al.  The changing role of life cycle phases, subsystems and materials in the LCA of low energy buildings , 2010 .

[11]  Xu Zhang,et al.  A detailed analysis of the embodied energy and carbon emissions of steel-construction residential buildings in China , 2016 .

[12]  Adisa Azapagic,et al.  Environmental impacts of the UK residential sector: Life cycle assessment of houses , 2012 .

[13]  Robert Ries,et al.  Comparison of energy-based indicators used in life cycle assessment tools for buildings , 2014 .

[14]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[15]  T. Malmqvist,et al.  Basic building life cycle calculations to decrease contribution to climate change Case study on an , 2011 .

[16]  Giovanni Andrea Blengini,et al.  Life cycle of buildings, demolition and recycling potential: A case study in Turin, Italy , 2009 .