Suspected acute pulmonary embolism: evaluation with multi-detector row CT versus digital subtraction pulmonary arteriography.

PURPOSE To determine diagnostic accuracy of four-channel multi-detector row computed tomography (CT) in emergency room and inpatient populations suspected of having acute pulmonary embolism (PE) who prospectively underwent both CT and pulmonary arteriography (PA). MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients referred for PA to assess suspected PE were eligible. Institutional review board approval and written informed consent were obtained. All patients underwent CT and PA within a 48-hour period. For CT, 4 x 2.5-mm collimation was used. Three readers independently evaluated each study for PE presence. PE status, vessel level, and lobar location were determined by means of majority rule, and interobserver agreement (kappa) was calculated for PE status, as assessed with each modality. Sensitivity and specificity of CT were calculated by using PA as the reference standard. Two radiologists later reviewed false-positive CT studies. RESULTS The study group comprised 93 patients (median age, 56 years; range, 19-88 years). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CT were 100%, 89%, and 91%, respectively. kappa values were 0.71 and 0.83 for CT and PA, respectively, and were not significantly different between modalities. At PA, 18 patients (19%) had PE at 50 vessel levels (five main and/or interlobar, 24 segmental, and 21 subsegmental), 17 (94%) of which had PE at multiple sites. At CT, 26 patients (28%) had PE at 71 vessel levels (24 main and/or interlobar, 33 segmental, and 14 subsegmental). Twenty patients (77%) had PE at multiple sites. Review of eight false-positive CT studies showed an appearance highly suggestive of acute PE in three patients, chronic PE in one, and no PE in three; one study was inconclusive. CT better demonstrated large-level vessel involvement (P < .01), while PA better demonstrated small-level vessel involvement (P < .01). CONCLUSION Multi-detector row CT has an accuracy of 91% in the depiction of suspected acute PE when conventional PA is used as the reference standard.

[1]  J. Caniego,et al.  Prospective comparison of helical CT with angiography in pulmonary embolism: global and selective vascular territory analysis. Interobserver agreement , 2003, European Radiology.

[2]  B Ghaye,et al.  Peripheral pulmonary arteries: how far in the lung does multi-detector row spiral CT allow analysis? , 2001, Radiology.

[3]  A Vieillard-Baron,et al.  Pulmonary embolism detection: prospective evaluation of dual-section helical CT versus selective pulmonary arteriography in 157 patients. , 2000, Radiology.

[4]  J. Remy,et al.  Diagnosis of central pulmonary embolism with helical CT: role of two-dimensional multiplanar reformations. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  X Marchandise,et al.  Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with spiral CT: comparison with pulmonary angiography and scintigraphy. , 1996, Radiology.

[6]  J. Fleiss.  Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1974 .

[7]  P. Investigators,et al.  Value of the ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism. Results of the prospective investigation of pulmonary embolism diagnosis (PIOPED). , 1990 .

[8]  J. Brink,et al.  Anatomic distribution of pulmonary emboli at pulmonary angiography: implications for cross-sectional imaging. , 1996, Radiology.

[9]  D. Aberle,et al.  The Effect of Imaging Modality on Patient Management in the Evaluation of Pulmonary Thromboembolism , 2001, Journal of thoracic imaging.

[10]  T. McLoud,et al.  Acute pulmonary embolism: assessment of helical CT for diagnosis. , 1998, Radiology.

[11]  V. Tapson,et al.  The Evaluation of Suspected Pulmonary Embolism , 2003 .

[12]  P. McCullagh,et al.  Generalized Linear Models, 2nd Edn. , 1990 .

[13]  Alexander Crispin,et al.  Subsegmental pulmonary emboli: improved detection with thin-collimation multi-detector row spiral CT. , 2002, Radiology.

[14]  K. Sterling,et al.  Safety of pulmonary angiography in the 1990s. , 1996, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[15]  Matthew S. Johnson.  Current strategies for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolus. , 2002, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[16]  S. Zeger,et al.  Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models , 1986 .

[17]  W D Foley,et al.  Detection of pulmonary embolism in patients with unresolved clinical and scintigraphic diagnosis: helical CT versus angiography. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  R. J. Johnston,et al.  Pulmonary embolism: diagnosis with spiral CT and ventilation-perfusion scanning--correlation with pulmonary angiographic results or clinical outcome. , 1998, Radiology.