Reconstructive utility of the bilobed flap: lessons from flap successes and failures.

BACKGROUND Although the bilobed transposition flap's utility in the reconstruction of difficult facial surgical wounds is often praised, the complicated design of the flap can produce unacceptable esthetic results if the nuances of flap design and execution are not properly understood. OBJECTIVE To review the historical development of the bilobed flap and to offer contemporary suggestions on how to manipulate the flap's design to improve the flap's performance. METHODS Illustrative case examples of bilobed flap successes and failures are appropriately and thoroughly examined. RESULTS The proper use of the bilobed flap completely depends on understanding the design modifications of the flap that can impact the flap's final appearance. CONCLUSIONS The bilobed flap, with its complicated design and requirement of meticulous operative technique, introduces tremendous opportunities for esthetic misadventure. Nonetheless, the flap, when properly constructed, deserves its reputation as the reconstructive flap of choice for many difficult wounds, particularly those wounds located on the distal nose.

[1]  J. Esser Gestielte lokale Nasenplastik mit zweizipfligem Lappen, Deckung des sekundären Defektes vom ersten Zipfel durch den zweiten , 1918, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Chirurgie.

[2]  J. Cook A Review of the Bilobed Flap's Design with Particular Emphasis on the Minimization of Alar Displacement , 2000, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].

[3]  D. Evans,et al.  The Use of a Bilobed Flap in the Correction of Radial Club Hand , 1995, Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume.

[4]  R. Moy,et al.  PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS RECONSTRUCTION OF THE NOSE UTILIZING A BILOBED FLAP , 1994, International Journal of Dermatology.

[5]  L. Field Peripheral tissue undermining is not the final answer to prevent trapdooring in transposition flaps. , 1993, The Journal of Dermatologic Surgery and Oncology.

[6]  R. Wolf Serial replacement of sutures for preventing suture marks. , 1993, The Journal of Dermatologic Surgery and Oncology.

[7]  V. Quatela,et al.  Bilobed Flap Reconstruction of the Temporal Forehead , 1992 .

[8]  A. Chiarelli,et al.  Use of the bilobed flap for coverage of exposed structures on the fingers. , 1992, The Journal of hand surgery.

[9]  K. Hosokawa,et al.  Sheet of scar causes trapdoor deformity: a hypothesis. , 1990, Annals of Plastic Surgery.

[10]  N. Walker,et al.  Micrographic (MOHS') surgery in the management of periocular basal cell epitheliomas , 1990, Eye.

[11]  J. Zitelli The bilobed flap for nasal reconstruction. , 1989, Archives of dermatology.

[12]  R. Carroll,et al.  Mohs surgery is the treatment of choice for recurrent (previously treated) basal cell carcinoma. , 1989, The Journal of dermatologic surgery and oncology.

[13]  R. Moy,et al.  Buried vertical mattress suture. , 1989, The Journal of dermatologic surgery and oncology.

[14]  J. Yarborough Ablation of facial scars by programmed dermabrasion. , 1988, The Journal of dermatologic surgery and oncology.

[15]  L. Dzubow The dynamics of flap movement: effect of pivotal restraint on flap rotation and transposition. , 1987, The Journal of dermatologic surgery and oncology.

[16]  R. Webster,et al.  Trapdoor effect in nasolabial flaps. Causes and corrections. , 1985, Archives of otolaryngology.

[17]  R. Bumsted,et al.  Auricular malignant neoplasms. Identification of high-risk lesions and selection of method of reconstruction. , 1982, Archives of otolaryngology.

[18]  D. Soutar,et al.  A critical assessment of the bilobed flap. , 1981, British journal of plastic surgery.

[19]  Morgan Bl,et al.  Advantages of the bilobed flap for closure of small defects of the face. , 1973 .

[20]  M. Tardy,et al.  The bilobed flap in nasal repair. , 1972, Archives of otolaryngology.

[21]  A. Zimany THE BI-LOBED FLAP , 1953, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.