Resources and dual-task performance; resource allocation versus task integration.

This study aims at contributing to the explanation of dual-task performance in terms of either resource allocation or of task interference and integration. Twenty-four subjects carried out, single and in combination, a motor interval production task and a perceptual target detection task on the basis of combined memory and display search. The demands of the target detection task were varied by increasing or decreasing the presentation rate of successive search displays. Furthermore, the presentation rate was either constant or variable. The dual-task condition had a negative effect on interval production, the extent of which was unaffected by either rate or variability of display presentation. This means that there was no evidence for synchronizing interval production with display presentation, so that the major opportunity for task integration did not substantiate. It is suggested that the two tasks use different resource pools in addition to a common mechanism, the limited capacity of which causes a general interference in dual-task conditions.

[1]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[2]  E. Spelke,et al.  Dividing Attention Without Alternation or Automaticity , 1980 .

[3]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: 1. Detection, Search, and Attention. , 1977 .

[4]  Olin W. Smith,et al.  Relationship of rhythm discrimination to motor rhythm performance. , 1957 .

[5]  Andries F. Sanders,et al.  Some Remarks on Mental Load , 1979 .

[6]  P. McLeod.  A Dual Task Response Modality Effect: Support for Multiprocessor Models of Attention , 1977 .

[7]  M. Posner.  Chronometric explorations of mind : the third Paul M. Fitts lectures, delivered at the University of Michigan, September 1976 , 1978 .

[8]  S. Keele,et al.  Do perception and motor production share common timing mechanisms: a correctional analysis. , 1985, Acta psychologica.

[9]  Andries F. Sanders,et al.  Concurrence costs in double stimulation tasks , 1981 .

[10]  Andries F. Sanders,et al.  S-Oh-R: Oh Stages! Oh Resources! , 1984 .

[11]  E. Hunt,et al.  Individual Differences in Attention. , 1989 .

[12]  D. Broadbent.  Task combination and selective intake of information. , 1982, Acta psychologica.

[13]  John A. Michon,et al.  Timing in temporal tracking , 1967 .

[14]  K. Newell.  30 The Speed-Accuracy Paradox in Movement Control: Errors of Time and space , 1980 .

[15]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: I , 1977 .

[16]  David Navon,et al.  The Role of Outcome Conflict in Dual-Task Interference. ICS Report 8601. , 1986 .

[17]  O. Neumann.  Beyond capacity: A functional view of attention , 1987 .

[18]  S. T. Klapp,et al.  Doing two things at once: The role of temporal compatibility , 1979 .

[19]  E. Spelke,et al.  Skills of divided attention , 1976, Cognition.

[20]  Daniel Gopher,et al.  On the Economy of the Human Processing System: A Model of Multiple Capacity. , 1977 .

[21]  G. Logan.  Attention in character-classification tasks: Evidence for the automaticity of component stages. , 1978 .

[22]  N Moray,et al.  Where is capacity limited? A survey and a model. , 1967, Acta psychologica.