Behaviour delay and robot expressiveness in child-robot interactions: A user study on interaction kinesics

This paper presents results of a novel study on interaction kinesics where 18 children interacted with a humanoid child-sized robot called KASPAR. Based on findings in psychology and social sciences we propose the temporal behaviour matching hypothesis which predicts that children will adapt to and match the robot's temporal behaviour. Each child took part in six experimental trials involving two games in which the dynamics of interactions played a key part: a body expression imitation game, where the robot imitated expressions demonstrated by the children, and a drumming game where the robot mirrored the children's drumming. In both games KASPAR responded either with or without a delay. Additionally, in the drumming game, KASPAR responded with or without exhibiting facial/gestural expressions. Individual case studies as well as statistical analysis of the complete sample are presented. Results show that a delay of the robot's drumming response lead to larger pauses (with and without robot nonverbal gestural expressions) and longer drumming durations (with nonverbal gestural expressions only). In the imitation game, the robot's delay lead to longer imitation eliciting behaviour with longer pauses for the children, but systematic individual differences are observed in regards to the effects on the children's pauses. Results are generally consistent with the temporal behaviour matching hypothesis, i.e. children adapted the timing of their behaviour, e.g. by mirroring to the robot's temporal behaviour.

[1]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Design spaces and niche spaces of believable social robots , 2002, Proceedings. 11th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[2]  C. Trevarthen Musicality and the intrinsic motive pulse: evidence from human psychobiology and infant communication , 1999 .

[3]  E. Hall,et al.  The Dance of Life: The Other Dimension of Time , 1984 .

[4]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Looking Good? Appearance Preferences and Robot Personality Inferences at Zero Acquaintance , 2007, AAAI Spring Symposium: Multidisciplinary Collaboration for Socially Assistive Robotics.

[5]  K. Dautenhahn,et al.  16. Living with Socially Intelligent Agents: A Cognitive Technology view , 2000 .

[6]  W. S. Condon,et al.  A segmentation of behavior , 1967 .

[7]  B. Shneiderman A nonanthropomorphic style guide: overcoming the humpty dumpty syndrome , 1989 .

[8]  R. W. Mitchell,et al.  The interpretation of animal psychology : Anthropomorphism or behavior reading ? , 1997 .

[9]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Interactional Structure Applied to the Identification and Generation of Visual Interactive Behavior: Robots that (Usually) Follow the Rules , 2001, Gesture Workshop.

[10]  Chrystopher L. Nehaniv,et al.  Sustaining interaction dynamics and engagement in dyadic child-robot interaction kinesics: lessons learnt from an exploratory study , 2005, ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005..

[11]  Anders Green,et al.  Involving users in the design of a mobile office robot , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[12]  Hiroyuki Iizuka,et al.  Adaptability and Diversity in Simulated Turn-taking Behavior , 2003, Artificial Life.

[13]  David Lee,et al.  Perception of Robot Smiles and Dimensions for Human-Robot Interaction Design , 2006, ROMAN 2006 - The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[14]  Yoshihiro Miyake,et al.  Co-creation in man-machine interaction , 2003, The 12th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2003. Proceedings. ROMAN 2003..

[15]  Frank J. Bernieri,et al.  Interpersonal coordination: Behavior matching and interactional synchrony. , 1991 .

[16]  Saul Greenberg,et al.  Prototyping an intelligent agent through Wizard of Oz , 1993, INTERCHI.

[17]  Yuichiro Yoshikawa,et al.  Responsive Robot Gaze to Interaction Partner , 2006, Robotics: Science and Systems.

[18]  Tomio Watanabe,et al.  Time lag effects of utterance to communicative actions on robot-human greeting interaction , 2003, The 12th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2003. Proceedings. ROMAN 2003..

[19]  Susan M. Wagner,et al.  How our hands help us learn , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  J. Nadel,et al.  The evolving nature of imitation as a format for communication. , 1999 .

[21]  A. Kendon Movement coordination in social interaction: some examples described. , 1970, Acta psychologica.

[22]  Tomio Watanabe E-COSMIC: embodied communication system for mind connection , 2004, RO-MAN 2004. 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (IEEE Catalog No.04TH8759).