Evaluation of the Mediseus® Epidural Simulator

The demand for increased patient safety has led to greater use of simulation training of health professionals performing medical procedures. The study aim was to evaluate the usefulness of the Mediseus® Epidural Simulator in teaching basic epidural needle-handling skills. Three groups of 15 anaesthetists (Novice=zero to two year anaesthesia trainees; Intermediate=three- to five-year anaesthesia trainees; Expert=consultants and regional-specialist anaesthetists) from three different medical centres participated. Each participant performed 20 simulated epidural needle insertions and was scored on several parameters (e.g. time, success of the insertion, bone collisions). Following familiarisation with the simulator and the needle insertions, participants answered seven questions on the applicability of the simulator to the teaching of basic epidural needle-handling skills. There was a clear learning effect with regard to the simulation procedure time, this decreasing throughout the experiment (P=0.037). There was no significant influence of either group or experience with the simulator in the study on the number or type of errors made. The quality of the simulation was scored 2.3 out of 5.0 (for bone simulation) and 4.7 (for loss-of-resistance simulation). All groups considered that the simulator was best suited for training prospective anaesthetists. Each group rated the usefulness of the simulator for training novices at greater than 3.0 out of 5.0. The Mediseus® Epidural Simulator seems to be an appropriate training device for an introduction to epidural needle insertion. For medical professionals with procedural knowledge, the simulation is not realistic enough and the simulator did not distinguish between the groups based on the errors made.

[1]  R S Haluck,et al.  Computers and virtual reality for surgical education in the 21st century. , 2000, Archives of surgery.

[2]  A. Scherpbier,et al.  New training strategies for anaesthesia residents , 2011, Current opinion in anaesthesiology.

[3]  Jenny Dankelman,et al.  Surgical training and simulation , 2005, Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy.

[4]  Zaki-Udin Hassan,et al.  Using a mannequin-based simulator for anesthesia resident training in cardiac anesthesia. , 2006, Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare.

[5]  Christoph Konrad,et al.  Learning Manual Skills in Anesthesiology: Is There a Recommended Number of Cases for Anesthetic Procedures? , 1998, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[6]  D. Kopacz,et al.  The Regional Anesthesia “Learning Curve”: What Is the Minimum Number of Epidural and Spinal Blocks to Reach Consistency? , 1995, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[7]  R S Haluck,et al.  Simulation and virtual reality for surgical education. , 1999, Surgical technology international.

[8]  K. Moorthy,et al.  Laparoscopic skills training and assessment , 2004, The British journal of surgery.

[9]  R. Satava,et al.  Virtual reality as a metric for the assessment of laparoscopic psychomotor skills , 2002, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[10]  T. Horlocker,et al.  Neurologic Complications of Spinal and Epidural Anesthesia , 1999, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[11]  P M Kuduvalli,et al.  Unanticipated difficult airway management in anaesthetised patients: a prospective study of the effect of mannequin training on management strategies and skill retention , 2008, Anaesthesia.

[12]  G. Fried,et al.  Relationship between objective assessment of technical skills and subjective in-training evaluations in surgical residents. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[13]  J. Jakimowicz,et al.  Virtual reality surgical laparoscopic simulators , 2003, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[14]  H. Owen,et al.  Learning on a simulator does transfer to clinical practice. , 2009, Resuscitation.

[15]  J. Dankelman,et al.  Transfer validity of laparoscopic knot-tying training on a VR simulator to a realistic environment: A randomized controlled trial , 2008, Surgical Endoscopy.

[16]  P. Bromage.  Nerve Injury and Paralysis Related to Spinal and Epidural Anesthesia , 1993, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[17]  R. Haluck.  Computer-Based Surgical Simulation is Too Expensive. Or is it? , 2005, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[18]  J. Dankelman,et al.  Construct validity and assessment of the learning curve for the SIMENDO endoscopic simulator , 2007, Surgical Endoscopy.