Toward an Understanding of Gender Differences in Written Business Communications: A Suggested Perspective for Future Research

Empirical studies of gender-based language differences have provided con flicting, discreet conclusions that have little relevance for business- communications instruction. This paper presents informally collected obser vations of male and female students in undergraduate and graduate business- and technical-communication courses. Calling for future formal studies to verify its findings, this study concludes that people-intensive work experience modifies gender-based language differences in written business communica tions of undergraduate and graduate students. However, instruction in audi ence analysis, tone, content design, and style also modify these gender differences. If formally supported, these observations would help teachers argue for the value of business-communications instruction in helping stu dents develop varied and androgynous communication styles important for job-related communications.

[1]  G. Green.  How to get people to do things with words , 1975 .

[2]  R. G. Kent,et al.  Language: Its Nature, Development, and Origin , 1923 .

[3]  N. Henley,et al.  Body Politics: Power, Sex, and Nonverbal Communication , 1977 .

[4]  Patricia Hayes Bradley,et al.  The Folk-Linguistics of Women's Speech: An Empirical Examination. , 1981 .

[5]  Adelaide Haas,et al.  Male and female spoken language differences: Stereotypes and evidence. , 1979 .

[6]  A. Mulac,et al.  Effects of selected American regional dialects upon regional audience members , 1977 .

[7]  Kenneth E. Andersen,et al.  A summary of experimental research in ethos , 1963 .

[8]  Robin Tolmach Lakoff.  Women's Language , 1977 .

[9]  F. Schwartz,et al.  Management Women and the New Facts of Life , 1989 .

[10]  H. N. Mischel.  Sex Bias in the Evaluation of Professional Achievements. , 1974 .

[11]  S. Bem,et al.  Sex role adaptability: One consequence of psychological androgyny. , 1975 .

[12]  V. Richmond,et al.  The Relationship between Psychological Gender Orientation and Communicator Style , 1980 .

[13]  F. Johnson.  Political and Pedagogical Implications of Attitudes towards Women's Language. , 1983 .

[14]  J. Werbel,et al.  Gender Differences in Managerial Communication: Fact or Folk-linguistics? , 1986 .

[15]  Robert Rosenthal,et al.  Sex differences in nonverbal and verbal communication with bosses, peers, and subordinates. , 1985 .

[16]  Tamara Brown.  On a women's language , 1990 .

[17]  Philip Goldberg,et al.  Are women prejudiced against women? , 1968 .

[18]  Barbara Westbrook Eakins,et al.  Sex differences in human communication , 1978 .

[19]  Cynthia Berryman-Fink,et al.  A multivariate investigation of perceptual attributions concerning gender appropriateness in language , 1983 .

[20]  Mary Ritchie Key,et al.  Male/female language , 1975 .

[21]  C. Kramer,et al.  Women's speech: Separate but unequal? , 1974 .

[22]  G. Gleser,et al.  The relationship of sex and intelligence to choice of words: a normative study of verbal behavior. , 1959, Journal of clinical psychology.

[23]  An Empirical Test of the Gender-Linked Language Effect in a Public Speaking Setting , 1982 .

[24]  A. Mulac,et al.  Differences in perceptions created by syntactic‐semantic productions of male and female speakers , 1980 .

[25]  Karen A. Foss,et al.  THE STATUS OF RESEARCH ON WOMEN AND COMMUNICATION , 1983 .

[26]  J. Mccroskey.  A summary of experimental research on the effects of evidence in persuasive communication , 1969 .

[27]  The Use and Development of Sex-typed Language , 1984 .

[28]  Daniel N. Maltz,et al.  A Cultural Approach to Male-Female Miscommunication , 1983 .

[29]  The Relationship Between Gender and Writing Style in Business Communications , 1988 .