Lower versus Higher Glycemic Criteria for Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes.

BACKGROUND Treatment of gestational diabetes improves maternal and infant health, although diagnostic criteria remain unclear. METHODS We randomly assigned women at 24 to 32 weeks' gestation in a 1:1 ratio to be evaluated for gestational diabetes with the use of lower or higher glycemic criteria for diagnosis. The lower glycemic criterion was a fasting plasma glucose level of at least 92 mg per deciliter (≥5.1 mmol per liter), a 1-hour level of at least 180 mg per deciliter (≥10.0 mmol per liter), or a 2-hour level of at least 153 mg per deciliter (≥8.5 mmol per liter). The higher glycemic criterion was a fasting plasma glucose level of at least 99 mg per deciliter (≥5.5 mmol per liter) or a 2-hour level of at least 162 mg per deciliter (≥9.0 mmol per liter). The primary outcome was the birth of an infant who was large for gestational age (defined as a birth weight above the 90th percentile according to Fenton-World Health Organization standards). Secondary outcomes were maternal and infant health. RESULTS A total of 4061 women underwent randomization. Gestational diabetes was diagnosed in 310 of 2022 women (15.3%) in the lower-glycemic-criteria group and in 124 of 2039 women (6.1%) in the higher-glycemic-criteria group. Among 2019 infants born to women in the lower-glycemic-criteria group, 178 (8.8%) were large for gestational age, and among 2031 infants born to women in the higher-glycemic-criteria group, 181 (8.9%) were large for gestational age (adjusted relative risk, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.80 to 1.19; P = 0.82). Induction of labor, use of health services, use of pharmacologic agents, and neonatal hypoglycemia were more common in the lower-glycemic-criteria group than in the higher-glycemic-criteria group. The results for the other secondary outcomes were similar in the two trial groups, and there were no substantial between-group differences in adverse events. Among the women in both groups who had glucose test results that fell between the lower and higher glycemic criteria, those who were treated for gestational diabetes (195 women), as compared with those who were not (178 women), had maternal and infant health benefits, including fewer large-for-gestational-age infants. CONCLUSIONS The use of lower glycemic criteria for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes did not result in a lower risk of a large-for-gestational-age infant than the use of higher glycemic criteria. (Funded by the Health Research Council of New Zealand and others; GEMS Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number, ACTRN12615000290594.).

[1]  M. Cabana,et al.  Screening for Gestational Diabetes: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. , 2021, JAMA.

[2]  R. Bilous,et al.  Resolving the Gestational Diabetes Diagnosis Conundrum: The Need for a Randomized Controlled Trial of Treatment , 2021, Diabetes Care.

[3]  D. Simmons,et al.  Increasing prevalence of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus when implementing the IADPSG criteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2020, Diabetes research and clinical practice.

[4]  K. Khunti,et al.  Progression to type 2 diabetes in women with a known history of gestational diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2020, BMJ.

[5]  R. Retnakaran,et al.  Gestational diabetes and the risk of cardiovascular disease in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2019, Diabetologia.

[6]  A. Dyer,et al.  Association of Gestational Diabetes With Maternal Disorders of Glucose Metabolism and Childhood Adiposity , 2018, JAMA.

[7]  J. Geoffrey Chase,et al.  Association of Neonatal Glycemia With Neurodevelopmental Outcomes at 4.5 Years , 2017, JAMA pediatrics.

[8]  A. Lin,et al.  Adopting the new World Health Organization diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes: How the prevalence changes in a high-risk region in Australia. , 2017, Diabetes research and clinical practice.

[9]  A. Dyer,et al.  Maternal and Neonatal Morbidity for Women Who Would Be Added to the Diagnosis of GDM Using IADPSG Criteria: A Secondary Analysis of the Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome Study , 2016, Diabetes Care.

[10]  Cuilin Zhang,et al.  Prevalence of Gestational Diabetes and Risk of Progression to Type 2 Diabetes: a Global Perspective , 2016, Current Diabetes Reports.

[11]  J. Kaiser,et al.  Association Between Transient Newborn Hypoglycemia and Fourth-Grade Achievement Test Proficiency: A Population-Based Study. , 2015, JAMA pediatrics.

[12]  T. Kenealy,et al.  Impact of using the international association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups criteria in South Auckland: prevalence, interventions and outcomes , 2015, The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology.

[13]  T. Fenton,et al.  A systematic review and meta-analysis to revise the Fenton growth chart for preterm infants , 2013, BMC Pediatrics.

[14]  D. Feig,et al.  Diabetes and pregnancy. , 2013, Canadian journal of diabetes.

[15]  R. Moses,et al.  The impact of potential new diagnostic criteria on the prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus in Australia , 2011, The Medical journal of Australia.

[16]  A. Dyer,et al.  International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Recommendations on the Diagnosis and Classification of Hyperglycemia in Pregnancy , 2010, Diabetes Care.

[17]  B. Vohr,et al.  Gestational diabetes: The forerunner for the development of maternal and childhood obesity and metabolic syndrome? , 2008, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[18]  J. Oats,et al.  Gestational diabetes mellitus ‐ management guidelines: The Australasian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society , 1998, The Medical journal of Australia.

[19]  H. Sarnat,et al.  Neonatal encephalopathy following fetal distress. A clinical and electroencephalographic study. , 1976, Archives of neurology.