Interpreting social science link analysis research: A theoretical framework

Link analysis in various forms is now an established technique in many different subjects, reflecting the perceived importance of links and of the Web. A critical but very difficult issue is how to interpret the results of social science link analyses. It is argued that the dynamic nature of the Web, its lack of quality control, and the online proliferation of copying and imitation mean that methodologies operating within a highly positivist, quantitative framework are ineffective. Conversely, the sheer variety of the Web makes application of qualitative methodologies and pure reason very problematic to large-scale studies. Methodology triangulation is consequently advocated, in combination with a warning that the Web is incapable of giving definitive answers to large-scale link analysis research questions concerning social factors underlying link creation. Finally, it is claimed that although theoretical frameworks are appropriate for guiding research, a Theory of Link Analysis is not possible. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Motivations for academic web site interlinking: evidence for the Web as a novel source of information on informal scholarly communication , 2003, J. Inf. Sci..

[2]  A. F. J. VAN RAAN,et al.  In matters of quantitative studies of science the fault of theorists is offering too little and asking too much , 1998, Scientometrics.

[3]  J. Ravetz.  Sociology of Science , 1972, Nature.

[4]  George A. Barnett,et al.  Hyperlink-affiliation network structure of top web sites: Examining affiliates with hyperlink in Korea , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[5]  Alfred J. Lotka,et al.  The frequency distribution of scientific productivity , 1926 .

[6]  John Law,et al.  Aircraft Stories: Decentering the Object in Technoscience , 2002 .

[7]  Ravi Kumar,et al.  On the Bursty Evolution of Blogspace , 2003, WWW '03.

[8]  Mike Thelwall.  The top 100 linked-to pages on UK university web sites: high inlink counts are not usually associated with quality scholarly content , 2002, J. Inf. Sci..

[9]  R. Rousseau.  Sitations: an exploratory study , 1997 .

[10]  Stefaan Walgrave,et al.  New media, new movements? The role of the internet in shaping the ‘anti‐globalization’ movement , 2002 .

[11]  Judit Bar-Ilan,et al.  Evolution, continuity, and disappearance of documents on a specific topic on the Web: A longitudinal study of informetrics , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[12]  Ramanathan V. Guha,et al.  Information diffusion through blogspace , 2004, SKDD.

[13]  Lennart Björneborn.  Small-world linkage and co-linkage , 2001, HYPERTEXT '01.

[14]  Peter Ingwersen,et al.  Informetric analyses on the world wide web: methodological approaches to 'webometrics' , 1997, J. Documentation.

[15]  Judit Bar-Ilan,et al.  Data collection methods on the Web for infometric purposes — A review and analysis , 2004, Scientometrics.

[16]  Paul Ogilvie,et al.  Acrophile: an automated acronym extractor and server , 2000, DL '00.

[17]  Monika Henzinger,et al.  Hyperlink Analysis for the Web , 2001, IEEE Internet Comput..

[18]  Charles Oppenheim,et al.  Highly cited old papers and the reasons why they continue to be cited , 1978, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[19]  Mark Levene,et al.  Web Dynamics , 2004, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[20]  Sriram Raghavan,et al.  Searching the Web , 2001, ACM Trans. Internet Techn..

[21]  Josep-Manuel Rodríguez-Gairín.  Valoración del impacto de la información en Internet: Altavista, el “Citation Index” de la red , 1997 .

[22]  Jon Kleinberg,et al.  Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment , 1999, SODA '98.

[23]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  Mapping university-industry-government relations on the Internet: The construction of indicators for a knowledge-based economy. , 2000 .

[24]  Kirsten A. Foot,et al.  Analyzing Linking Practices: Candidate Sites in the 2002 US Electoral Web Sphere , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[25]  Peter Ingwersen,et al.  Perspective of webometrics , 2004, Scientometrics.

[26]  Hak-Joon Kim.  Motivation for hyperlinking in scholarly electronic articles: a qualitative study , 2000 .

[27]  Christopher Abbott.  Some Young Male Web Site Owners: the technological aesthete, the community builder and the professional activist , 2001 .

[28]  Judit Bar-Ilan,et al.  A microscopic link analysis of academic institutions within a country — the case of Israel , 2004, Scientometrics.

[29]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[30]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Graph structure in three national academic Webs: Power laws with anomalies , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[31]  Chaomei Chen,et al.  How did university departments interweave the Web: A study of connectivity and underlying factors , 1998, Interact. Comput..

[32]  Ramanathan V. Guha,et al.  Information diffusion through blogspace , 2004, WWW '04.

[33]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  Daily time series of common single word searches in AltaVista and NorthernLight , 1998 .

[34]  Blaise Cronin,et al.  Bibliometrics and beyond: some thoughts on web-based citation analysis , 2001, J. Inf. Sci..

[35]  Norman Kaplan,et al.  The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations , 1974 .

[36]  Daryl E. Chubin,et al.  Content Analysis of References: Adjunct or Alternative to Citation Counting? , 1975 .

[37]  Sergey Brin,et al.  The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine , 1998, Comput. Networks.

[38]  P. David Marshall,et al.  Web Theory: An Introduction , 2002 .

[39]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Link Analysis: An Information Science Approach , 2004 .

[40]  Katherine W. McCain,et al.  Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview , 1990, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[41]  Michael H. MacRoberts,et al.  Problems of citation analysis , 1996, Scientometrics.

[42]  K. Hyland,et al.  Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing , 2001 .

[43]  Jonathan Furner,et al.  Scholarly communication and bibliometrics , 2005, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[44]  Peter Ingwersen,et al.  The calculation of web impact factors , 1998, J. Documentation.

[45]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Linked: The New Science of Networks , 2002 .

[46]  Ray R. Larson,et al.  Bibliometrics of the World Wide Web: An Exploratory Analysis of the Intellectual Structure of Cyberspace , 1996 .

[47]  Kimberly A. Neuendorf,et al.  The Content Analysis Guidebook , 2001 .

[48]  Marc Najork,et al.  A large‐scale study of the evolution of Web pages , 2003, WWW '03.

[49]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Hyperlinks as a data source for science mapping , 2004, J. Inf. Sci..

[50]  Alastair Smith,et al.  A Tale of Two Web Spaces: Comparing Sites Using Web Impact Factors. , 1999 .

[51]  Alexander C. Halavais,et al.  Mapping networks of support for the Zapatista movement: Applying social network analysis to study contemporary social movements: Online activism in theory and practice , 2003 .

[52]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Theories of Citation , 1998 .

[53]  M. Foucault.  The archaeology of knowledge , 1970 .

[54]  Samer Faraj,et al.  The Role of Intermediaries in the Development of Trust on the WWW: The Use and Prominence of Trusted Third Parties and Privacy Statements , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[55]  Ravi Kumar,et al.  Trawling the Web for Emerging Cyber-Communities , 1999, Comput. Networks.

[56]  Robert C. Vreeland.  Law Libraries in Hyperspace: A Citation Analysis of World Wide Web Sites , 2000 .

[57]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  What is this link doing here? Beginning a fine-grained process of identifying reasons for academic hyperlink creation , 2003, Inf. Res..

[58]  Angel A Hernández-Borges,et al.  Can Examination of WWW Usage Statistics and other Indirect Quality Indicators Help to Distinguish the Relative Quality of Medical websites? , 1999, Journal of medical Internet research.

[59]  Judit Bar-Ilan,et al.  Search engine results over time-a case study on search engine stability , 1998 .