Relaxations for Minimizing Metric Distortion and Elastic Energies for 3D Shape Matching

We present two methods for non-rigid shape matching. Both methods formulate shape matching as an energy minimization problem, where the energy measures distortion of the metric defined on the shapes in one case, or directly describes the physical deformation relating the two shapes in the other case. The first method considers a parametrized relaxation of the widely adopted quadratic assignment problem (QAP) formulation for minimum distortion correspondence between deformable shapes. In order to control the accuracy/sparsity trade-o a weighting parameter is introduced to combine two existing relaxations, namely spectral and game-theoretic. This leads to an approach for deformable shape matching with controllable sparsity. The second method focuses on computing a geometrically consistent and spatially dense matching between two 3D shapes. Rather than mapping points to points it matches infinitesimal surface patches while preserving the geometric structures. In this spirit, matchings are considered as dieomorphisms between the objects’ surfaces which are by definition geometrically consistent. Based on the observation that such dieomorphisms can be represented as closed and continuous surfaces in the product space of the two shapes, this leads to a minimal surface problem in this product space. The proposed discrete formulation describes the search space with linear constraints. Computationally, the approach results in a binary linear program whose relaxed version can be solved eciently in a globally optimal manner.

[1]  Facundo Mémoli,et al.  Gromov–Wasserstein Distances and the Metric Approach to Object Matching , 2011, Found. Comput. Math..

[2]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  A Theoretical and Computational Framework for Isometry Invariant Recognition of Point Cloud Data , 2005, Found. Comput. Math..

[3]  Leo Grady,et al.  Minimal Surfaces Extend Shortest Path Segmentation Methods to 3D , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[4]  Leonidas J. Guibas,et al.  A Condition Number for Non‐Rigid Shape Matching , 2011, Computer Graphics Forum.

[5]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  Geodesics in Shape Space via Variational Time Discretization , 2009, EMMCVPR.

[6]  Hemant D. Tagare,et al.  Shape-based nonrigid correspondence with application to heart motion analysis , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  Nikos Paragios,et al.  Dense non-rigid surface registration using high-order graph matching , 2010, 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[8]  Thomas A. Funkhouser,et al.  Möbius voting for surface correspondence , 2009, ACM Trans. Graph..

[9]  Alexander M. Bronstein,et al.  A game-theoretic approach to deformable shape matching , 2012, 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[10]  Yasuo Kuniyoshi,et al.  Efficient Shape Matching using Vector Extrapolation , 2013, BMVC.

[11]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[12]  Hervé Delingette,et al.  Triangular Springs for Modeling Nonlinear Membranes , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[13]  Martin Rumpf,et al.  An image processing approach to surface matching , 2005, SGP '05.

[14]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Convex Optimization , 2004, Algorithms and Theory of Computation Handbook.

[15]  Martial Hebert,et al.  A spectral technique for correspondence problems using pairwise constraints , 2005, Tenth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV'05) Volume 1.

[16]  Daniel Cremers,et al.  Curvature regularity for region-based image segmentation and inpainting: A linear programming relaxation , 2009, 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision.

[17]  Ron Kimmel,et al.  Generalized multidimensional scaling: A framework for isometry-invariant partial surface matching , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  I. Holopainen Riemannian Geometry , 1927, Nature.

[19]  Yasuo Kuniyoshi,et al.  Elastic Net Constraints for Shape Matching , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[20]  Anil N. Hirani,et al.  Discrete exterior calculus , 2005, math/0508341.

[21]  Daniel Cremers,et al.  Fast Matching of Planar Shapes in Sub-cubic Runtime , 2007, 2007 IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer Vision.

[22]  Radu Horaud,et al.  SHREC '11: Robust Feature Detection and Description Benchmark , 2011, 3DOR@Eurographics.

[23]  Leonidas J. Guibas,et al.  SHREC 2010: robust correspondence benchmark , 2010 .

[24]  Mark Meyer,et al.  Discrete Differential-Geometry Operators for Triangulated 2-Manifolds , 2002, VisMath.

[25]  Daniel Cremers,et al.  Geometrically consistent elastic matching of 3D shapes: A linear programming solution , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision.

[26]  Yoram Singer,et al.  Efficient Learning of Label Ranking by Soft Projections onto Polyhedra , 2006, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[27]  H. Zou,et al.  Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net , 2005 .

[28]  Abdel Nasser,et al.  A Survey of the Quadratic Assignment Problem , 2014 .

[29]  Wojciech Matusik,et al.  Articulated mesh animation from multi-view silhouettes , 2008, ACM Trans. Graph..

[30]  M. Giaquinta Cartesian currents in the calculus of variations , 1983 .

[31]  J. Sullivan A Crystalline Approximation Theorem for Hypersurfaces , 1990 .

[32]  P. G. Ciarlet,et al.  An Introduction to Differential Geometry with Applications to Elasticity , 2006 .

[33]  I. Daubechies,et al.  Surface Comparison with Mass Transportation , 2009, 0912.3488.