Measurement of Experience: Construct and Content Validity of the Experience Questionnaire

The Experience Questionnaire, a research instrument measuring experiential data, was derived from literature on peak performance and peak experience, with constructs extended to comprise negative extremes of performance and feeling. The efficacy of the Experience Questionnaire is tested by addressing accessibility and salience of experiential data and independence of construct events. Data on construct events (peak performance, peak experience, flow, average events, misery, and failure) were gathered from 123 adults. Since over-all event effects were significant on repeated-measures multivariate analysis of variance, discriminant analysis and analysis of variance with repeated measures were used. Construct independence and salience of experiential data are supported by correct classification of 97.7% of construct events and differences among construct events on factor and item scores that provide clear, differential descriptions. Peak performance is characterized by full focus and self in clear process. The role of other people is unimportant. Peak experience is noted for fulfillment, significance, spirituality, and the importance of other people. Play, other people, and outer structure, but not spirituality, are endorsed in flow. Average events have outer structure, but full focus is a negative correlate. Misery is characterized by spirituality and significance, but other people, playfulness, and self in clear process are denied. Failure is characterized by spirituality but lacks fulfillment.

[1]  G. Privette,et al.  Highest Happiness: An Analysis of Artists' Peak Experience , 1989 .

[2]  G. Privette,et al.  Reliability and Readability of Questionnaire: Peak Performance and Peak Experience , 1986 .

[3]  G. Privette Experience as a Component of Personality Theory: Phenomenological Support , 1985 .

[4]  G. Privette Experience as a Component of Personality Theory , 1985 .

[5]  G. Privette,et al.  Peak experience, peak performance, and flow: A comparative analysis of positive human experiences. , 1983 .

[6]  G. Privette,et al.  Factor Analysis of Peak Performance: The Full Use of Potential , 1983 .

[7]  G. Privette Experiential Correlates of Peak Intellectual Performance , 1982 .

[8]  G. Privette Dynamics of Peak Performance , 1981 .

[9]  V. Martens The "peak experience" as it relates to sport : a philosophic inquiry , 1981 .

[10]  K. Ravizza Peak Experiences in Sport , 1977 .

[11]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  Beyond Boredom and Anxiety: The Experience of Play in Work and Games. , 1977 .

[12]  M. Csíkszentmihályi Play and Intrinsic Rewards , 1975 .

[13]  J. Fagan,et al.  Religious Dogmatism and Peak Experiences: A Test of Maslow's Hypothesis , 1972 .

[14]  A. Maslow The Farther Reaches of Human Nature , 1971 .

[15]  H. B. Andrews,et al.  Some personality correlates of peak experiences--a study in self-actualization. , 1969, Journal of clinical psychology.

[16]  Marghanita Laski Ecstasy: A Study of Some Secular and Religious Experiences , 1968 .

[17]  A. Maslow Religions, Values, and Peak Experiences , 1965 .

[18]  A. Maslow Toward a Psychology of Being , 1962 .

[19]  R. Fisher The Advanced Theory of Statistics , 1943, Nature.