Longitudinal analysis of large social networks: Estimating the effect of health traits on changes in friendship ties

We develop novel mixed effects models to examine the role of health traits on the status of peoples' close friendship nominations in the Framingham Heart Study. The health traits considered are both mutable (body mass index (BMI), smoking, blood pressure, body proportion, muscularity, and depression) and, for comparison, basically immutable (height, birth order, personality type, only child, and handedness); and the traits have varying degrees of observability. We test the hypotheses that existing ties (i.e. close friendship nominations) are more likely to dissolve between people with dissimilar (mutable and observable) health traits whereas new ties are more likely to form between those with similar (mutable and observable) traits while controlling for persons' age, gender, geographic separation, and education. The mixed effects models contain random effects for both the nominator (ego) and nominated (alter) persons in a tie to account for the fact that people were involved in multiple relationships and contributed observations at multiple exams. Results for BMI support the hypotheses that people of similar BMI are less likely to dissolve existing ties and more likely to form ties, while smoker to non-smoker ties were the least likely to dissolve and smoker to smoker ties were the most likely to form. We also validated previously known findings regarding homophily on age and gender, and found evidence that homophily also depends upon geographic separation. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[2]  C. Steglich,et al.  DYNAMIC NETWORKS AND BEHAVIOR: SEPARATING SELECTION FROM INFLUENCE: separating selection from influence , 2010 .

[3]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[4]  M. Duijn,et al.  Software for social network analysis , 2005 .

[5]  N. Christakis Social networks and collateral health effects , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  Seymour Sudman,et al.  Experiments in measuring neighbor and relative social networks , 1988 .

[7]  Peter V. Marsden,et al.  Interviewer effects in measuring network size using a single name generator , 2003, Soc. Networks.

[8]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Manual for SIENA version 2.1 , 2005 .

[9]  Yu Xie,et al.  A Preference‐Opportunity‐Choice Framework with Applications to Intergroup Friendship1 , 2008, American Journal of Sociology.

[10]  K. Campbell,et al.  Name generators in surveys of personal networks , 1991 .

[11]  A. James O’Malley,et al.  The analysis of social networks , 2008, Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology.

[12]  Peter D. Hoff,et al.  Latent Space Approaches to Social Network Analysis , 2002 .

[13]  C. Fischer,et al.  Networks and places: social relations in the urban setting , 1977 .

[14]  Mark Huisman,et al.  StOCNET: Software for the statistical analysis of social networks , 2003 .

[15]  M. Hammer,et al.  Explorations into the meaning of social network interview data , 1984 .

[16]  G. Madey,et al.  Uncovering individual and collective human dynamics from mobile phone records , 2007, 0710.2939.

[17]  N. Christakis,et al.  The Spread of Obesity in a Large Social Network Over 32 Years , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  Peter V. Marsden,et al.  Interpretation and interview context: examining the General Social Survey name generator using cognitive methods , 1999, Soc. Networks.

[19]  H. Richardson Community of Values as a Factor in Friendships of College and Adult Women , 1940 .

[20]  Gary L. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Direct-line distances--international edition , 1986 .

[21]  N. Christakis,et al.  SUPPLEMENTARY ONLINE MATERIAL FOR: The Collective Dynamics of Smoking in a Large Social Network , 2022 .

[22]  N. Christakis,et al.  Dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network: longitudinal analysis over 20 years in the Framingham Heart Study , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[23]  T. Snijders,et al.  p2: a random effects model with covariates for directed graphs , 2004 .

[24]  C. McCarty,et al.  COMPARING FOUR DIFFERENT METHODS FOR MEASURING PERSONAL SOCIAL NETWORKS , 1990 .

[25]  George C. Runger,et al.  Longitudinal analysis of friendship networks , 1979 .

[26]  Garry Robins,et al.  An introduction to exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks , 2007, Soc. Networks.

[27]  C. Loomis Political and occupational cleavages in a Hanoverian village, Germany : a sociometric study , 1946 .

[28]  M. Rosén On randomized controlled trials and lifestyle interventions. , 1989, International journal of epidemiology.

[29]  Eric P. Xing,et al.  Discrete Temporal Models of Social Networks , 2006, SNA@ICML.

[30]  N. Christakis,et al.  Quitting in Droves: Collective Dynamics of Smoking Behavior in a Large Social Network , 2010 .

[31]  D. Singh,et al.  Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: role of waist-to-hip ratio. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[32]  A. Moore,et al.  Dynamic social network analysis using latent space models , 2005, SKDD.

[33]  David Krackhardt,et al.  Heider vs Simmel: Emergent Features in Dynamic Structures , 2006, SNA@ICML.